Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fatawa Boxes( صندوق الفتاوى)

Channel

Fatawa Boxes( صندوق الفتاوى)

@EngFatawaboxes_9_9_9_Bot

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

863subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002619205236
TypeChannel
Username@EngFatawaboxes_9_9_9_Bot
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/EngFatawaboxes_9_9_9_Bot

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8528668596 August 2026 — 853 subscribers7 August 2026 — 853 subscribers13 August 2026 — 852 subscribers20 August 2026 — 857 subscribers27 August 2026 — 861 subscribers4 September 2026 — 866 subscribers11 September 2026 — 863 subscribers8636 August 202611 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 850–868 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 23:21863-3
4 Sept 2026, 11:59866+5
27 Aug 2026, 17:19861+4
20 Aug 2026, 23:06857+5
13 Aug 2026, 13:48852-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:13853no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:48853first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
535.7%
🔥428.6%
💯321.4%
👍214.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC181 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🆕 Fatāwā Boxes Official English channel Presents ⬇️ 🔊Valuable Excerpt🔊 The Difference Between Ahlu-Sunnah And Shi'ah? 🎙️ Ash-Shaykh Abūl Yaman Adnan Al- Masqaree ((حفظه الله)) https://t.me/EngFatawaboxes_9_9_9_Bot/505 https://t.me/BOT_9_9_1/36325

2

3 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC207 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

What Shaykh Should we direct the question to?

  1. Ash-Shaykh Rashaad Ad-Dhalee'e22%
  2. Ash-Shaykh Abdul-Ghani Al-Omaree25%
  3. Ash-Shaykh Radman Al-Hubayshee6%
  4. Ash-Shaykh Adnan Al-Masqaree17%
  5. Ash-Shaykh Fatḥ Al-Qadasi10%
  6. Ash-Shaykh Bassām Al-Gharaasi6%
  7. Ash-Shaykh Hassan Qasim Al-Raymee6%
  8. Ash-Shaykh Faysal Al-Hashidee22%
  9. Ash-Shaykh Abdulhameed Al-Zoukory41%

The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC201 viewsread 6 August 2026

Are Earthquakes, Calamities, and Natural Disasters a Consequence of Oppression or a Divine Warning? 📩Question📩 ♦️Question for the Shaykh:♦️ Assalāmu ʿAlaykum wa Raḥmatullāhi wa Barakātuh, Shaykh. May Allah preserve you. We recently heard that an earthquake measuring approximately 5.5 on the Richter scale occurred in Cairo, Egypt. Our question is: What are the reasons that Allah, the Exalted, sends earthquake

31 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC495 viewsread 6 August 2026

Exposing Family and Marital Affairs Online 📩Question:📩 The Questioner asks: ⤵️ What is your advice for people who publicize their private lives, marital problems, or matters related to marriage and divorce on social media? 📨Answered by:📨 🎙Ash-Shaykh Abee Abdillaah Muhammad Ba Jamal ((حفظه الله)) "This is a foolish person!!! Such a person should be restrained and prevented from doing this. It is a Ca

31 Jul 2026, 06:52 UTC455 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/EngFatawaboxes_9_9_9_Bot https://t.me/BOT_9_9_1

25 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC478 viewsread 6 August 2026

The Criteria for A Minor's Participation in The Prayer Row 📩Question📩 He says :⤵️ "What is the ruling on a young boy (i.e., a minor who has not yet reached the age of puberty) praying in the row (ṣaff), and what is the criterion for determining whether he is discerning (mumayyiz)? Does a discerning child interrupt the row?" 📨Answered by📨 🎙Ash-Shaykh Abee Billal Al-Hadramee The discerning child (muma

24 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC199 viewsread 6 August 2026
Voice message

Fatāwā Boxes Official English Ash-Shaykh Abee Hudayfah Abdul-Ghani Al-Omaree

24 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC393 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The Disease of Picture-Making بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم و بركاتة السلام عليكم ورحمة و بركاتة A Brother from America asks:⤵️ This is a question that requires a clear answer due to its importance and the great need for clarification, because of the confusion and ambiguity that has become widespread regarding this issue. The Brother says:⤵️ "I have remained in a state of uncertainty and doubt concerning this mat

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EngFatawaboxes_9_9_9_Bot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTCAnonymous Poll69 voters

What Shaykh Should we direct the question to?

  1. Ash-Shaykh Rashaad Ad-Dhalee'e22%
  2. Ash-Shaykh Abdul-Ghani Al-Omaree25%
  3. Ash-Shaykh Radman Al-Hubayshee6%
  4. Ash-Shaykh Adnan Al-Masqaree17%
  5. Ash-Shaykh Fatḥ Al-Qadasi10%
  6. Ash-Shaykh Bassām Al-Gharaasi6%
  7. Ash-Shaykh Hassan Qasim Al-Raymee6%
  8. Ash-Shaykh Faysal Al-Hashidee22%
  9. Ash-Shaykh Abdulhameed Al-Zoukory41%

The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fatawa Boxes( صندوق الفتاوى)” (@EngFatawaboxes_9_9_9_Bot), 863 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EngFatawaboxes_9_9_9_Bot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.