Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 44 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 907–924 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:37
909
-1
10 Sept 2026, 07:58
910
-3
1 Sept 2026, 21:58
913
-5
26 Aug 2026, 04:02
918
-1
18 Aug 2026, 08:22
919
-1
12 Aug 2026, 08:24
920
-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:04
922
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:36
922
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
¿A qué se refiere Pablo en el verso 10 con la frase: "la mujer debe cubrirse por causa de los ángeles"? 👼❓
👁️ Los ángeles observan el culto y exigen que se respete el orden de Dios32%
🛡️ Como protección espiritual contra ángeles caídos16%
👤 "Ángeles" aquí se refiere humanamente a los pastores o mensajeros de la iglesia21%
🏳️ Me rindo, no tengo la menor idea26%
😎Tengo otra respuesta16%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
El final del rey Salomón es uno de los temas más fascinantes y discutidos de la teología bíblica. Un hombre que lo tuvo todo: sabiduría divina, riqueza y la autoría de libros inspirados, pero que terminó sus días rodeado de idolatría y altares paganos.
🟢 Sí fue salvo (Por el pacto con David y el arrepentimiento en Eclesiastés)33%
🔴 No fue salvo (Murió en apostasía activa y sin registro de arrepentimiento)4%
🟡 No se puede saber (La Biblia no lo dice y el juicio es solo de Dios)58%
🟤 No sé4%
⚪️Tengo otra respuesta0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Al analizar la historia de Judas Iscariote, ¿cuál es tu perspectiva teológica?
📜 Cumplimiento profético: Todo estaba predestinado para que así sucediera37%
🛑 Libre albedrío total: Él eligió consciente y libremente la traición20%
🔀 Una mezcla misteriosa entre la soberanía divina y la responsabilidad humana43%
🤷♂ No sé3%
😎 Tengo otra respuesta0%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
¿Cuál es la interpretación más acertada de las palabras de Jesús en Mateo 16:28 ("algunos de los que están aquí no gustarán la muerte hasta que vean al Hijo del Hombre viniendo en su reino" )? 🤔👇
🏔️ Apuntaba a la Transfiguración: Ocurrió días después ante Pedro, Jacobo y Juan3%
🌅 Apuntaba a la Resurrección / Ascensión: Su triunfo sobre la muerte y entronización celestial21%
🔥 Apuntaba al día de Pentecostés: La venida del Reino con poder a través del Espíritu Santo13%
🏛️ La caída de Jerusalén: Manifestación de su juicio histórico y fin de la era del Templo13%
🌍 La expansión de la Iglesia: El avance del evangelio por el mundo romano en el siglo I5%
🎺 La Segunda Venida: Una expectativa escatológica literal para esa misma generación, pero falló8%
👁️ Interpretación Espiritual: Ver el Reino internamente por la fe y el nuevo nacimiento13%
😔No sé8%
💬 Tengo otra postura (explico mi argumento en los comentarios)16%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
¿Qué opinas de las acciones y declaraciones del Pastor Tony Spell?
🛡️ Actuó bien; un hombre debe defender a su familia a toda costa21%
❌ La defensa es válida, pero usar la Biblia para jactarse de la agresión está mal32%
🕊️ Debió actuar con mansedumbre, ser pacifista y dejar el caso a la policía26%
🤔 No opino hasta que la justicia aclare si las amenazas del vecino eran reales42%
🤔No tengo idea de que decir5%
🥸Tengo otra opinión. La dejo en los comentarios 👇0%
The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed ✝️Jimmy Freeman🟦🟥
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EncuestasCristianas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿A qué se refiere Pablo en el verso 10 con la frase: "la mujer debe cubrirse por causa de los ángeles"? 👼❓
👁️ Los ángeles observan el culto y exigen que se respete el orden de Dios32%
🛡️ Como protección espiritual contra ángeles caídos16%
👤 "Ángeles" aquí se refiere humanamente a los pastores o mensajeros de la iglesia21%
🏳️ Me rindo, no tengo la menor idea26%
😎Tengo otra respuesta16%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
El final del rey Salomón es uno de los temas más fascinantes y discutidos de la teología bíblica. Un hombre que lo tuvo todo: sabiduría divina, riqueza y la autoría de libros inspirados, pero que terminó sus días rodeado de idolatría y altares paganos.
🟢 Sí fue salvo (Por el pacto con David y el arrepentimiento en Eclesiastés)33%
🔴 No fue salvo (Murió en apostasía activa y sin registro de arrepentimiento)4%
🟡 No se puede saber (La Biblia no lo dice y el juicio es solo de Dios)58%
🟤 No sé4%
⚪️Tengo otra respuesta0%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Encuestas Cristianas” (@EncuestasCristianas), 909 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EncuestasCristianas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
