Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jóvenes Cristianos de todo el mundo

Channel

Jóvenes Cristianos de todo el mundo

@CanalDeJovenesCristianos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,025subscribers

+43 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001776661596
TypeChannel
Username@CanalDeJovenesCristianos
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CanalDeJovenesCristianos

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9821,0251,003.58 August 2026 — 982 subscribers8 August 2026 — 982 subscribers9 August 2026 — 986 subscribers16 August 2026 — 990 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,000 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,011 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,015 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,013 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,014 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,016 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,020 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,025 subscribers8 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 976–1,031 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:401,025+5
14 Sept 2026, 18:211,020+4
11 Sept 2026, 14:001,016+2
6 Sept 2026, 21:571,014+1
2 Sept 2026, 09:221,013-2
30 Aug 2026, 01:281,015+4
27 Aug 2026, 07:571,011+11
24 Aug 2026, 08:261,000+10
16 Aug 2026, 14:53990+4
9 Aug 2026, 20:31986+4
8 Aug 2026, 21:15982no change
8 Aug 2026, 21:02982first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2659.1%
🙏1022.7%
👍818.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC57 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

7 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC78 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ

❤3

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

6 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC93 viewsread 8 August 2026

Si un ladrón entra a la casa de un cristiano ¿qué debería hacer? ¿Orar, o defender a su familia con alguna arma? 🤔👇

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

6 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC118 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Cinco segundos de ira pueden costarte un televisor. Cinco minutos, una amistad. Un día de enojo sin control, un matrimonio. Una vida sin dominio propio deja, al final, una lista larga de arrepentimientos. El problema no es que sintamos emociones fuertes, sino quién las decide por nosotros. La Biblia no promete que nunca sentirás enojo; nos advierte que no dejemos que la ira nos lleve a pecar. Tener dominio propio no…

👍4

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

5 Aug 2026, 21:42 UTC108 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtube.com/shorts/6HrwF71Sxkg?is=JJCzQKtX4nlLdQUN

❤2

Signed Juan Cruz

5 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC106 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ

❤1

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

4 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC126 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ

🙏3❤1

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

2 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC157 viewsread 8 August 2026

Abrimos debate: ¿Qué práctica “cristiana” actual crees que no es bíblica? 🤔 Te leo en los comentarios 👇

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

2 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC158 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ

🙏3

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

1 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC168 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Leer la Biblia no consiste simplemente en acumular conocimiento, porque hasta el mismo enemigo conoce las Escrituras y aun así permanece en rebelión contra Dios. La verdadera evidencia de que la Palabra está obrando en nosotros no es cuánto sabemos de ella, sino cuánto nos transforma, cuánto nos lleva a amar a Cristo, a abandonar el pecado y a vivir en obediencia. Necesitamos acercarnos a la Biblia con un corazón hum…

👍2🙏2❤1

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

29 Jul 2026, 23:25 UTC199 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♡ ㅤ ❍ㅤ ⎙ㅤ ⌲ ˡᶦᵏᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵉⁿᵗ ˢᵃᵛᵉ ˢʰᵃʳᵉ

❤1

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

28 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC204 viewsread 8 August 2026

¿Qué consejo le darías a un cristiano que critica constantemente la iglesia donde se congrega? 🤔 Te leo en los comentarios 👇

Signed ƦᗅՏƖᗴし

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CanalDeJovenesCristianos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTCAnonymous Poll22 voters

¿A qué se refiere Pablo en el verso 10 con la frase: "la mujer debe cubrirse por causa de los ángeles"? 👼❓

  1. 👁️ Los ángeles observan el culto y exigen que se respete el orden de Dios32%
  2. 🛡️ Como protección espiritual contra ángeles caídos14%
  3. 👤 "Ángeles" aquí se refiere humanamente a los pastores o mensajeros de la iglesia27%
  4. 🏳️ Me rindo, no tengo la menor idea23%
  5. 😎Tengo otra respuesta14%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

¿Destruye 1 Corintios 11 la idea moderna de que los roles de género son solo un "invento social"? 💥🧐

  1. 🎯 Sí, demuestra que la diferencia de roles fue diseñada por Dios desde el Génesis37%
  2. 🙅‍♂️ No, el pasaje está condicionado por la mentalidad patriarcal de la época10%
  3. ⚖️ No destruye la igualdad de valor, pero sí confirma que tenemos funciones distintas47%
  4. 👀 Yo vine a leerlos pues no sé que responder7%
  5. 😎Tengo otra respuesta y se la comento en breve0%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Jul 2026, 02:21 UTCAnonymous Poll35 voters

¿Cómo se debe aplicar hoy el pasaje de 1 Corintios 11 sobre el velo/cobertura de la mujer? 🧐📖

  1. 🎭 Es 100% cultural, el principio de respeto sigue, pero el velo ya no aplica hoy40%
  2. 📜 Es un mandato eterno, las mujeres deberían seguir usándolo en el culto actual14%
  3. 💇‍♀️ El velo de la época equivale al cabello largo de la mujer hoy en día29%
  4. 🤷‍♂️ No tengo idea, ese pasaje siempre me ha parecido un enigma14%
  5. 😎Tengo otra respuesta. Se las comento en breve3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jul 2026, 22:38 UTCAnonymous Poll36 voters

¿Qué creen que significaba realmente "entregar a Satanás para destrucción de la carne" (1 Cor 5:5)? 🤔👇

  1. 🚪❌ Excomunión formal: Expulsarlo de la iglesia y dejarlo sin protección espiritual42%
  2. 🤒💥 Sufrimiento físico: Que el diablo lo atacara con enfermedades para que reaccionara11%
  3. 🛑💀 Destrucción del ego: Romper su orgullo y su naturaleza pecaminosa (la "carne")17%
  4. 🔄❤️ Una hipérbole: Una expresión exagerada de Pablo para asustar y corregir al pecador6%
  5. 🤷‍♂️📚 Un misterio: El contexto cultural de la época hace imposible saberlo con certeza11%
  6. 🤔❓ ​No sé8%
  7. ✍​💬 ¡Dejo mi teoría en los comentarios!6%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jóvenes Cristianos de todo el mundo” (@CanalDeJovenesCristianos), 1,025 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CanalDeJovenesCristianos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.