Channel
@EmirKrco
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
526subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001312690584 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EmirKrco |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EmirKrco |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 526 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 524 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:30 | 527 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 527 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (28 July 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,236 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 08:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
118 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 81 | 68.6% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 31.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
PROPIS ČINJENJA ŠIRKA ILI KUFRA ZBOG NUŽDE ILI KORISTI Kaže uvaženi šejh Ali el-Hudajr, fekkellahu esrahu: "Pitanje: Da li nužda ili korist dozvoljavaju širk ili kufr? Odgovor je: Ne. Ovo je savremeno pitanje, a ono glasi da ni nužda niti korist ne dozvoljavaju širk ili kufr. Ne možeš, naprimjer, otići i parničiti se pred sekularnim sudom, pa reći da si bio prinuđen. To nije dozvoljeno. Ne možeš ući u parlament rad…
❤4
Dozvoljeni ustupci u vremenu slabosti (2/2) 6. Postoje i stvari povezane s vjerom čije izostavljanje ne predstavlja štetu po vjeru Primjer za to jeste izostavljanje određenih izraza i opisa prilikom sklapanja sporazuma na Hudejbiji. Bitno je razumjeti razliku između izostavljanja određenog izraza i negiranja onoga što taj izraz označava. Ako se izostavljanjem ne negira istina niti se prihvata neistina, ono može biti…
❤6
O dozvoljenim ustupcima u vremenu slabosti (1/2) 📌 Pred vama je sažetak jednog dijela knjige „El-Usuluš-šer’ijje“ šejha Nasira el-Fehda. U ovom dijelu, koji se u originalu sastoji od nekoliko stranica, autor govori o pitanju koje je posebno važno u okolnostima slabosti muslimana: šta je dozvoljeno ustupiti nevjernicima radi otklanjanja štete, a šta nije dopušteno ustupati ni u stanju slabosti. Ovo pitanje nije mog…
❤4👍1
👆Da li je ovo Allahov šerijat i sunnet Poslanika, sallallahu alejhi ve sellem, ili nije? A ako nije, šta je onda?
Direktor Uprave za odgovornost i kažnjavanje pri Nacionalnoj komisiji za tranzicijsku pravdu, advokat Radif Mustafa, za El-Ihbarijju je izjavio: 📌 Sud je u osudi Ahmeda Hassouna (muftija u Asadovom režimu) primijenio teoriju pomaganja, podsticanja i pružanja moralne podrške. 📌 Sud se prilikom pravne kvalifikacije krivičnog djela oslonio na međunarodno humanitarno pravo i međunarodno krivično pravo. 📌 Sud je pri od…
👍5❤3
Odgovor na šubhu: "Povijest Salahuddina Ejjubija kao dokaz za politička pitanja" (2/2) Tvrdnja da je Salahuddin, rahimehullah, „tri godine bio vezir, slušao hutbe kufra i širka, gledao kako se to širi kroz državne institucije i nije ništa poduzimao“ predstavlja ozbiljno iskrivljavanje historijskih činjenica. Prije svega, nije tačno da Salahuddin tokom svog vezirata „nije ništa mijenjao“. Naprotiv, historijski izvor…
❤6👍1
Eš-Šatibi, rahimehullah, upravo govori o tome da se izuzetak zbog nužde veže za stvarnu nuždu i njenu mjeru, a ne da nužda postane trajno opravdanje za određeni politički metod. Također, argument: „Ako se ova vlada ne podrži, doći će još gora vlast“ sam po sebi nije dovoljan šerijatski argument niti automatski mijenja propis određenog postupka. Šejhul-islam Ibn Tejmijje, rahimehullah, u svom govoru o Tatarima uprav…
❤5
Odgovor na šubhu: "Povijest Salahuddina Ejjubija kao dokaz za politička pitanja" (1/2) Historijski postupak pojedinca nije dokaz za ispravnost savremenog političkog metoda Ovdje je osnovni problem upravo u načinu dokazivanja. Historija Salahuddina, rahimehullah, nije dokaz koji se može staviti ispred Kur’ana, Sunneta i konsenzusa učenjaka. Postupak nekog čovjeka, ma koliko on bio velik i zaslužan, sam po sebi nije…
Tada ćemo možda početi slušati različita opravdanja: Jedan će uzeti kamatni kredit kako bi, navodno, izgradio školu Kur’ana. Drugi će kratiti bradu, spuštati nogavice i mijenjati svoj islamski izgled kako bi došao do što većeg broja ljudi i pozvao ih u islam. Treći će prijateljevati i sarađivati s pripadnicima raznih sekti, te činiti razne novotarije kako bi ih, navodno, vratio Sunnetu i time "ojačao" jedinstvo musli…
❤7
Šta možemo očekivati ako ne budemo govorili o novoj sirijskoj vladi? Najprije želim naglasiti da mi, kada pišemo o nekoj novonastaloj meseli, bilo da je riječ o sirijskom pitanju ili nekom drugom pitanju, to ne činimo zato što nemamo čime drugim da se bavimo, zato što imamo viška vremena, zato što nam je dosadno, zato što želimo biti u centru pažnje ili zato što želimo da nekom prkosimo. Allahu se utječemo od ovakvi…
Zašto je potrebno govoriti o novoj sirijskoj vladi? Kao odgovor na ovo pitanje odabrali smo govor dvojice velikih i priznatih učenjaka. Jedan od njih pripada ranijim generacijama, dok je drugi od učenjaka kasnijeg vremena. Razlog tome jeste želja da se odgovor ne veže za naše lično mišljenje, niti da se eventualni prigovor usmjeri prema nama, već da po ovom pitanju čujemo izravno stavove dvojice učenjaka čiji je aut…
❤3👍2
Nūruddīn Zenkī nije argument za opravdavanje savremenog demokratskog političkog projekta Ovakva komparacija između vremena Nūruddīna Zenkija i današnje sirijske vlasti nema čvrstu historijsku ni šerijatsku osnovu. Nūruddīn Zenkī, rahimehullah, djelovao je u vremenu u kojem su muslimanske zemlje bile pod vlašću tadašnjih islamskih dinastija, a pitanje oslobađanja Kudsa bilo je pitanje borbe između muslimanskih držav…
👍9
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @EmirKrco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Emir Krčo” (@EmirKrco), 526 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EmirKrco.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.