Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

M.info

@EmDeEllMedia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

212subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001474787388
TypeChannel
Username@EmDeEllMedia
DescriptionHier mein Kanal mit Meldungen und Kommentaren https://t.me/EmDeEllMedia Kurzversion https://t.me/EmDeEllMediaXtra Eigene Beiträge | Em Ell https://t.me/EmDeEllChannel HINWEIS https://t.me/EmDeEllMediaXtra/2226 https://t.me/EmDeEllMedia/33550
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/EmDeEllMedia

Growth

2127 Aug 2026, 12:34 — 212 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 11:00 — 212 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:348 Aug 2026, 11:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 211–213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 11:00212no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:34212first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.64%
avg views ÷ 212 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.2
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total324
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
133
Videos
91
Links
245

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3h 23m
Average length
33m 53s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 07:17 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschPhoto

MdEP Pürner weiter: „Bei den Masken genau dieselbe Masche. Plötzlich war jeder drittklassige Politiker und dessen Schwager „Logistikexperte“. Millionen an Provisionen für Masken, die keinen Wert für die Gesellschaft hatten, und die direkt oder nach Ablauf im Müll gelandet sind. Keinen hat das interessiert, waren ja Steuergelder. Und die Corona-Hilfen? Ein offenes Scheunentor für jeden der bescheissen wollte. Formul

8 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC11 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschPhoto

Diese Reflexe von Leuten, die allein von Berufs wegen skeptisch sein müssten, sind nicht hilfreich und das in mehrfacher Hinsicht. Ich bin sehr kritisch, was die illegale Masseneinwanderung, gerade im gezeigten Ausmaß, angeht, das dürfte bekannt sein. Deswegen darf ich aber nicht alles, was gerade passt nur einseitig betrachten. Ich kann nur immer wieder darauf hinweisen und betonen, dass deutsche Behörden durch za

8 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschVideo

Homburg zur Busfahrer-Story: „Zufällig vorbeikommender Busfahrer erlegt Semtex-Drohne per Fußtritt! Sämtliche Leitmedien finden das glaubhaft. Aber auch NIUS und Apollo fallen auf den absurdesten Nonsens herein, seit Chinesen die Straßen von Viren reinigten. Hintergrund: Einige fürchten, Berlin wolle den Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfall ausrufen, mit noch krasseren Lockdowns. Das ist unplausibel, denn Kriegsvorber

7 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC16 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @thedurancomVideo

West Kiev Panic As Patriots Run Out, Russia Hammers Odessa, Dobropiliya Breakthrough; Merz In Crisis

7 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC15 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschPhoto

„„Es liegt auf der Hand, dass es sich um eine hastig zusammengezimmerte Provokation handelt, die nur den Interessen des Kiewer Regimes und des militaristischen Flügels des europäischen Polit-Establishments dient.“ Die größte Gefahr, der sich Deutschland heute ausgesetzt sieht, besteht nicht in angeblichen ‚hybriden Attacken‘ aus Moskau, die es nicht gibt“, schreibt die Botschaft weiter. Die Gefahr bestehe vielmehr „

7 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026

Pepe Escobar : Iran Has No Fear of Trump - YouTube https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7ryENzD2NDw

7 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @thedurancomVideo

Russia Rearms, West Disarms. Zelensky Wants US to Strike Russian Missile Launchers

7 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC18 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @drjonastoegelVideo

Gute Beiträge bei der Tagesschau muss man oft lange suchen. Das hier ist so ein guter Beitrag: er setzt sich kritisch mit der geplanten Änderung des "Informationsfreiheitsgesetzes" auseinander, das vorsieht, dass es künftig kaum noch möglich sein wird, Dokumente des Staates (wie beispielsweise die RKI-Protokolle) freizuklagen. "Das ist kein Bürokratieabbau, das ist Demokratieabbau", sagt Arne Semsrott vom Portal "Fr

7 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC12 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @PROpaganda_GlobalePolitikVideo

Wie uns im modernen Informationsfeld die liberale Agenda als "Links", "Sozialismus" und "Kommunismus" verkauft wird. Wer sich häufig in sozialen Netzwerken aufhält, wird um ein Phänomen der sogenannten "Rechten" oder "Konservativen" nur schwer herumkommen: Die gesamte liberale Agenda ist links und überhaupt ist einfach alles Sozialismus und Kommunismus. So halten sich die Verfechter dieses oben genannten Phänomens

7 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC17 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @rosenbuschPhoto

Lanz vs. Correctiv. Correctiv vs. Lanz. LTO vs Correctiv. Mag ich. Einfach zusehen und🍿. https://www.lto.de/recht/feuilleton/f/abschied-vom-faktenbasierten-diskurs t.me/Rosenbusch

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @EmDeEllMedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 392,372 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“M.info” (@EmDeEllMedia), 212 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EmDeEllMedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.