Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Efix VPN | کانفیگ | پروکسی

@EfixVPN

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

496,976subscribers

-8,752 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003797747867
TypeChannel
Username@EfixVPN
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EfixVPN

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

496,976505,728501,3526 August 2026 — 505,728 subscribers6 August 2026 — 505,728 subscribers6 August 2026 — 504,941 subscribers7 August 2026 — 503,796 subscribers8 August 2026 — 502,761 subscribers9 August 2026 — 501,866 subscribers10 August 2026 — 500,462 subscribers12 August 2026 — 498,087 subscribers12 August 2026 — 496,976 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -8,752. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 495,663–507,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:06496,976-1,111
12 Aug 2026, 00:32498,087-2,375
10 Aug 2026, 21:21500,462-1,404
9 Aug 2026, 19:31501,866-895
8 Aug 2026, 22:10502,761-1,035
7 Aug 2026, 23:32503,796-1,145
6 Aug 2026, 20:30504,941-787
6 Aug 2026, 01:30505,728no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:21505,728first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.95%
avg views ÷ 496,976 subscribers
Avg views / post
19,600
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held46 (25 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total902,540
Reactions total15,622
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 23s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15,622 reactions across 46 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔6,96444.6%
🤣5,39934.6%
1,67010.7%
👍8075.17%
🤬4733.03%
👎3091.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,622reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 46 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @EfixVPN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC≈2,410 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

حرفی نمیمونه @EfixVPN

🤣441🤬1

12 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈3,090 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ایران اینا با ایران ما خیلی فرق داره @EfixVPN

💔54🤬13🤣21👎1

12 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC≈3,060 views80 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

تعجب نکنید اینجا خارج نیست اینجا تهران خودمونه و ایناهم آقازاده هایی هستن که پول یه شب تفریحشون برابری میکنه با حقوق دو ماه یک کارگر این پیج مخصوص آقا زاده هاست و آخر هر هفته عکسای دورهمی هاشون رو میزاره @EfixVPN

🤬60💔15🤣3👍1👎1

12 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈4,470 views154 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

کامنت رونالدو زیر پست مسی برای مرگ پدرش لئو، یک آغوش بزرگ برای تو و خانواده‌ات در این روزهای سخت می‌‌فرستم. امیدوارم قدرت و صبر داشته باشید. @EfixVPN

154

12 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC≈6,860 views235 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔴 طبق معمول یه نفر پیدا شده که آبرومون رو در سطح جهانی برده و اتحاد مردم برای جمع کردن این موضوع: @EfixVPN

🤣207👎253

12 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC≈8,310 views226 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔴 متاسفانه ایرج خواننده معروف، در 94 سالگی درگذشت. آثار معروفش که هممون شنیدیم: پیرهن صورتی دل منو بردی. اومدم از هند اومدم. دیشب با دلم خلوتی داشتم. لم بده برام رو صندلی. @EfixVPN

💔21111👍4

12 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC≈10,100 views194 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

پست کاملا منطقی یه دختر با کپشن: «یادت باشه اولین چیزی که توی استایلت باید بدرخشه، موهاته🍑» @EfixVPN

🤣176🤬125👎1

12 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈9,890 views574 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔴کیارش عزیزی و ارشیا عزیزی، دوتا از بازمانده‌های کلاس ششمی مدرسه میناب، تو آزمون ورودی مدارس تیزهوشان قبول شدن. @EfixVPN

💔397129🤣42👍6

11 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC≈16,300 views756 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔴 ساعاتی پیش ساناز مهرابی دشتکی ۱۵ ساله اهل مرودشت استان فارس به دلیل اینکه گفت با پسری که دوسش دارم میخوام ازدواج کنم توسط داییش با سلاح شکاری به قتل رسید. @EfixVPN

💔657🤬72👍9🤣95👎4

11 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC≈15,500 views149 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴طبق گفته کاربران، تو بعضی مناطق تهران صدای جنگنده شنیده میشه؛ ولی هنوز معلوم نیست جنگنده‌های خودی‌ان یا جنگنده‌های آمریکایی که دارن خبر موفقیت مذاکرات رو میارن. @EfixVPN

🤣114👍15👎10💔64

11 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTC≈15,300 views197 reactionsread 12 August 2026

راجب فرزند های کریس و جورجینا ۲تا بچه های اخری بله جورجینا بدنیا اورده بلا و الانا ۲تا دیگه هم یعنی اوا و متئو رحم اجاره ای هستن به این معنا نیست که مادر بچه جورجینا نیست توی این روش تخمک و اسپرم پدر مادر وارد بدن یک زن دیگه میشه و بچه ای ک بدنیا میاد از لحاظ ژنتیکی و دی ان ای و همه چیش مال پدر مادره فقط اون زن بچه رو حمل میکنه همین و اون فرزند فرزند بیولوژیکی کریس و جورجینا حساب میشه مثل بچه ای ک بدنیا اوردن پس اوا

👍123🤣4521👎7🤬1

11 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC≈14,400 views147 reactionsread 12 August 2026

در مورد بچه‌های رونالدو؛ از ۵ بچه کلا دوتاش مال جورجیناس. ۳ تا بچه دیگه‌اش از رحم اجاره‌ای هستن و هویت مادرشون معلوم نیست ۲ تا بچه ام سال ۲۰۲۲ جورجینا از رونالدو حامله بود که سقط شدن و مُردن.

💔103👎18🤬13👍83🤣2

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @EfixVPN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 890,062 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Efix VPN | کانفیگ | پروکسی” (@EfixVPN), 496,976 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EfixVPN.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.