Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ENGLISH FESS

@EnglishFess

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54,045subscribers

-293 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001461711014
TypeChannel
Username@EnglishFess
DescriptionTurning over a new leaf and addressing it warmly, we are created to accompany! 🎏 E-mail your menfess to: UNAVAILABLE Rules: @EngFessRules PP: @EnglishFessPP TXT: @TXTEngFess Reports: Unavailable Partnership: Unavailable
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/EnglishFess

Growth

54,04554,33854,191.56 August 2026 — 54,338 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,321 subscribers8 August 2026 — 54,255 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,197 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,151 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,087 subscribers12 August 2026 — 54,045 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54,001–54,382 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:1754,045-42
11 Aug 2026, 16:5754,087-64
10 Aug 2026, 16:3854,151-46
9 Aug 2026, 15:1354,197-58
8 Aug 2026, 16:2254,255-66
7 Aug 2026, 13:4154,321-17
6 Aug 2026, 18:0454,338first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
85,500
Videos
8,710
Links
25,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2026, 03:05 UTC≈22,500 viewsread 13 August 2026
File

English Fess’ earnings have never been used for the personal benefit of any admin. Every payment received has either been reinvested into improving and maintaining English Fess or remained in our funds for future operational needs. As a final use, we have decided to donate all remaining funds to those in need. To everyone who has supported our paid service, thank you for your trust and generosity. Your support has p

17 May 2026, 13:05 UTC≈25,500 viewsread 13 August 2026

‎ENGLISH FESS MAINTAINANCE NOTICE ‎ ‎Good evening, Enggies. We greatly appreciate all of the feedback that you have given to us. It has played a huge role in helping us resolve @disappointedenggieslmfao and clear up some misunderstandings. We also want to thank you for being kind enough to voice your opinions along the way. ‎ ‎We have personally apologized to the individuals whose names were mentioned, we regret that

16 May 2026, 05:10 UTC≈20,500 viewsread 13 August 2026

We have read the comments and the feedbacks given by you through the discussions group and we are discussing all of them. We also understand that we have made unforgivable mistakes and currently discussing what our next step will be. Since the discussion has gotten out of hand and actual feedbacks are drowned by other comments, we decided to close the comment section. If you have further constructive feedbacks for u

15 May 2026, 16:06 UTC≈19,500 viewsread 13 August 2026

We are opening up a space for Enggies who want to share feedback with English Fess. We will use all feedback, criticisms, and messages to reevaluate all aspects of our performance and work. We will review your feedback carefully one by one before taking further steps. Thank you, Enggies.

15 May 2026, 16:03 UTC≈19,500 viewsread 13 August 2026

‎SOLUTIONS ‎ ‎• We are revoking our previous policy announcement: https://t.me/EnglishFess/561878. Frustration and disappointment is understandable when the intention is genuine concern. ‎ ‎• Our admins’ group will no longer have bots other than @EnglishFessBot to avoid misunderstandings caused by auto-replies system by the bots. • Our official working hours are from 10 AM to 10 PM. If your report to @EnglishFessBot

15 May 2026, 15:58 UTC≈14,600 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ADMINS PENALTIES We understand that our admins are also accountable. Therefore, we are officially applying the following penalties: • Stardust: Stepping down as both owner and admin of English Fess as part of their accountability and responsibility regarding this issue. • Rebel: Dismissed from duty for 3 months and will not be involved in any interactions on @EnglishFess and @TXTEngFess during that period.

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @EnglishFess. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 11,082 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ENGLISH FESS” (@EnglishFess), 54,045 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EnglishFess.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.