Channel
@DyadyaVadya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003486442690 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DyadyaVadya |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DyadyaVadya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 36 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 37 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 36 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
51 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 26 | 51.0% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 35.3% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 7.84% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.92% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.96% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏁В прошлое воскресенье прошёл 5‑й этап кольцевых гонок.🏁 Ехало 13 человек. В целом всё прошло хорошо, с огоньком!🔥 Как и всегда, всё состояло из двух сегментов квалификации и трёх гонок. Отквалился я на 4‑е место. Поехал 1 гонку и на первом круге меня развернули - в итоге приехал 9‑м😢 На вторую гонку выехал с 1‑го места, финишировал 1‑м.🥳 В третьей гонке стартовал с 5‑й позиции, но практически перед финишем, мен…
🔥4❤2
🏁Прошел 4 этап Iron racer🏁 🤩Ехал я на красной Ford fiesta mk5 в зачёте street 100, где собралось 9 участников, где каждый хотел забрать подиум😬 Формат - тайм‑аттак: две попытки, чтобы выжать лучший круг 1 попытка не задалась, сбил стопку, дали 10 сек к времени круга😢 2 попытку, чисто, аккуратно, не спеша, выкатил на 3 место🥳 Но кто то в 1 попытке показал время лучше, что в абсолюте откинуло меня на 4 место😔 Ну …
👍5❤2🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
🔥4👍3
Сегодня готовился с завтрашнему iron racer, будет time attack😎
🔥3👍2👏1
🏁В воскресенье прошёл 4‑й этап кольцевых гонок🏁 Признаюсь честно: перед этапом я слёг с болезнью, так что с 3‑го этапа вообще не тренировался. Казалось, шансы на хороший результат стремятся к нулю… Но трасса не прощает слабостей - и я решил выжать из ситуации максимум! 😎 Формат этапа - как всегда: 5 этапов: ✅ разминка, ✅ квалификация, ✅ три гонки (со своими хитростями в расстановке на старте). И вот что получилось:…
👍6🔥3👏1
🏎Дядя Вадя🏎 pinned a photo
Даже на отдыхе найду, на чем погоняться😄😁
🔥5👍1
Волонтёрили с ребятами на марафоне Белые Ночи от Бегового сообщества @runc_run Всех финишеров накормили бананами и апельсинами🍊 и дали традиционную пятюню 🙌 Спасибо нашему тим-лидеру Юле @Volna_1503 за классную организацию нашей работы! Мы справились, всех дождались и встретили последних марафонцев в традиционном финишном коридоре!
🔥5👍1🥰1
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @DyadyaVadya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🏎Дядя Вадя🏎” (@DyadyaVadya), 36 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DyadyaVadya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.