Channel
@Duny_a0
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
359subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001196157150 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Duny_a0 |
| Description | أنطَفئُ كلّما غبتَ عنّي، كأنّي قندِيل، كأنّك ضيائي♥️. 2019/𝑨𝒖𝒈𝒖𝒔𝒕/17الـبـدايـة✨ . |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Duny_a0 |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @pekaninm/1262218 Sept 2024, 22:24 UTC | @Duny_a0/30812 · this entry18 Sept 2024, 22:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Duny_a0/30817 · this entry4 Sept 2025, 12:42 UTC | @pekaninm/126274 Sept 2025, 12:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Qadaaaar/3526418 Sept 2024, 22:24 UTC | @Duny_a0/30812 · this entry18 Sept 2024, 22:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Qadaaaar/352734 Sept 2025, 12:42 UTC | @Duny_a0/30817 · this entry4 Sept 2025, 12:42 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @pekaninm | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (6–0) |
| @Qadaaaar | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 7 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 August 2024 to 14 September 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Duny_a0 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 359 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:41 | 359 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
لە بیستەکانی تەمەنم بیست هەزار جار نوقووم بووم لەناو کێشەو ئاڵۆزیەکانم هەرچی دەمویست ببێت نەبوو هەرچی دەمویست وانەبێ وابوو زۆر سەختی و بەرزی و نزمیم بینی تێناگەم ئەم دنیایە ژانە بۆچی هاتمە ناوی دەبووایە کۆمەڵە ئاواتەکەم بهێنمە دی بەڵام نەمکرد دەبوایە خۆم کۆبکەمەوە نەبوو دەبوایە هەزاروو یەک وشەی شکست خواردوو قووت بدەمەوە کە کەس لێی تێناگات شەکەتی بیستەکانی تەمەن و ئازارەکانی ئەوەندەیە بەدەستم بووایە قەت پێم نە ئەخستە …
Signed 𝓓𝓾𝓷𝓪 ྀི
لە بیستەکانی تەمەنم بیست هەزار جار نوقووم بووم لەناو کێشەو ئاڵۆزیەکانم هەرچی دەمویست ببێت نەبوو هەرچی دەمویست وانەبێ وابوو زۆر سەختی و بەرزی و نزمیم بینی تێناگەم ئەم دنیایە ژانە بۆچی هاتمە ناوی دەبووایە کۆمەڵە ئاواتەکەم بهێنمە دی بەڵام نەمکرد دەبوایە خۆم کۆبکەمەوە نەبوو دەبوایە هەزاروو یەک وشەی شکست خواردوو قووت بدەمەوە کە کەس لێی تێناگات شەکەتی بیستەکانی تەمەن و ئازارەکانی ئەوەندەیە بەدەستم بووایە قەت پێم نە ئەخستە …
Signed 𝓓𝓾𝓷𝓪 ྀི
سەلام ئەزیزان چەند چەناڵێک هەیە بۆ فرۆشتن کێ ویستی مەسج بکات🩶. 11k 4k 3k 1k 2k 200 members 400 members 700 members✨. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 @dunaa3x @dunaa3x
Signed 𝓓𝓾𝓷𝓪 ྀི
ئەم زیندوو مانەوەیە، مانەوەیەکی بکوژە🖤» ⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/mergasat https://t.me/mergasat
Signed • ᴅᴜɴᴀ𓆦!
هۆگر بوونیش سەیرە مرۆڤ کەم ئەندام ئەکات لەنرخی مرۆڤ کەم ئەکاتەوە بەڕای من هۆگر بوون لە تەرازویەکی پڕ فێل ئەچێت چونکە کێشی خۆیان ئەنووسێ هۆگر بوونیش ئاوایە مرۆڤێک پڕ هەڵەیە لەگەڵتا بەڵام هۆگریت هەڵەکانی وون ئەکات و بە قورستر لەسەر میزانی خۆشەویستی ئەیکێشت🍓
Signed 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘢.
کاتێک هەموو هیوات دەبێتە شتێک ژیانت وێران دەبێت
Signed 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘢.
دەم ویست هەموو شتێک تەواو بێت بەڵام نەمدەویست تۆ تەواو بیت نەم دەویست هەموو شتێک لەخاڵێکدا بمێنێتەوە من پەشۆکاوم کەچیتر کەسە کۆنەکەم نابینم پەشۆکاوم دەتوانم هەموو دێڕە غەمگینەکان بنووسم دەتوانم هەموو گۆرانیە خەمناکەکان هەڵکەم بەڵام هیچیان ناتوانن بۆتۆی ڕوون بکەنەوە کە لەژیاندا من چیم دەوێت ! دەزانن بێهیوا بوون چیە ؟ پڕبەدڵ شتێک ئەنجام بدەی شەو ڕۆژی بۆ بخەیە سەر یەک بەڵام پێچەوانەکەی وەرگریت🌚🌚.
Signed 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘢.
. 💎کەناڵی سەرەکی https://t.me/barhamMovies 🔥کەناڵی تایبەت بە (دراماکان) https://t.me/barhamMovies2 💀 کەناڵی تایبەت بە فیلمە قێزە و ترسناکەکان https://t.me/+DOAQifLxoJE2YWIy 😞کەناڵی تایبەت بە ئەنیمی (وەن پیس) https://t.me/barham_movies 🖕کەناڵی تایبەت بە ئەنیمی (ناڕۆتۆ) https://t.me/naruto_kurdi 💜کەناڵی تایبەت بە درامای (ئەشقی یەکەم) https://t.me/barhammovies1 🫣کەن…
Signed 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘢.
عەیبە تا ئێستا جۆین ماڵەکەمت نەکردووە بەجدی نابێت فەرموون🦋 https://t.me/mergasat
Signed 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘢.
سڵاو لە هەموو ئازیزان چەناڵێکم بۆ هێناون تایبەت بە فیلم و زنجیرە چەناڵێکی زۆر زۆر تایبەتە💀 🤬 https://t.me/cinemastar11
Signed 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘢.
گەرچی من بڵاوی ناکەمەوە زۆربەی شێعرەکانم بەڵام ئەسەف تاڵن زۆربەی ڕۆژەکانم'
Signed 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘢.
دوو چەناڵ هەیە بۆ فرۆشتن و ئەکتیڤن شەش کەی و پێنج کەی بۆ نرخ چات بکە❤️ 6.6k 5k 👇 @duna2910
Signed 𝘋𝘶𝘯𝘢.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Duny_a0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
دەتانەوێ چیتان بۆ پۆست بکەم♥️؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2024 to 14 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Duny_a0 named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بـلا حـد 🦋.” (@Duny_a0), 359 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Duny_a0.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.