Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

محمد الوردي (قناة علمية)

@Dr_m_wrd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,747subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001399440264
TypeChannel
Username@Dr_m_wrd
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dr_m_wrd

Growth

1,7471,7491,7486 August 2026 — 1,749 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,749 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,748 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,747 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,747–1,749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:241,747-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:151,748-1
6 Aug 2026, 07:031,749no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:351,749first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.50%
avg views ÷ 1,747 subscribers
Avg views / post
131
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (2 May 20266 August 2026)
Views total131
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

79 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7594.9%
🤔22.53%
👍11.27%
🔥11.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTC131 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

رسالة_في_عدم_جواز_رفع_اليدين_للبابرتي.pdf

9 Jun 2026, 16:58 UTC639 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

منير خلوفي:، أزعم أنني قضيت سنين من عمري في فحص المقالات والمذاهب، وخلاصة خبرتي المتواضعة أن أقول: ★ كُلٌّ يُؤخَذ من قوله ويُرَدّ، والحقيقة المطلقة أوسع وأرقى وأسمى من أن يطالها أحدٌ، إلا إذا كان مؤيَّدا بوحيٍ إلهي. ★ جميعُ المذاهب أو الشخصيات التي خاضت في مضايق علم المعقول وعلم الكلام والفلسفة = ترِدُ عليها إشكالاتٌ قوية في بعض مقرَّراتها الأصلية أو الفرعية، وبعض تلك الإشكالات نقلي؛ وبعضها عقلي، وكثيرٌ من الأجوبة

2

9 Jun 2026, 11:09 UTC489 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

تنزيه الله عن المكان والحدود والجهات هو أصل اجتمع عليه أهل السنة من المذاهب الأربعة وفارقوا به الكرامية والسالمية والحلولية. وهذه نصوص الحنابلة: قال القاضي أبو يعلى في مختصر المعتمد (ص/56) : ولا يجوز وصفه بأنه في كل مكان ولا في مكان ويجوز أن يقال إنه تعالى في السماء على العرش. قال الشيخ عبد القادر في الغنية :" ولا يجوز عليه الحدود ولا النهاية ولا القبل ولا البعد ولا تحت ولا قدام ولا خلف ولا كيف ؛ لأن جميع ذلك ما ورد

6👍1🔥1

3 Jun 2026, 21:33 UTC428 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naseemalriadPhoto

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/14ffvRgCkCL/

4

3 Jun 2026, 11:03 UTC500 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

قال ابن المبارك رضي الله عنه: سأل أبو عصمة أبا حنيفة رضي الله عنه: ممن تأمرني أن أسمعَ الآثار؟ قال: (-من كل عدلٍ في هواه إلا الشِّيعة، فإنَّ أصل عَقْدهم تضليلُ أصحاب محمدٍ -صلى الله عليه وسلم- -ومن أتى السلطان طائعًا ، أما إنّي لا أقول إنهم يكذِّبونهم أو يأمرونهم بما لا ينبغي، ولكن وَطّأوا لهم، حتى انقادتْ العامةُ بهم ، فهذان لا ينبغي أن يكونا من أئمة المسلمين .) انتهى الكفاية في علم الرواية للخطيب. مفتاح الجنة للسيو

7

26 May 2026, 14:34 UTC903 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

دعاء عرفة - الإمام الغزالي.pdf

5

25 May 2026, 20:50 UTC544 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#عرفة شيخ الإسلام الحافظ أبو جعفر محمد بن منصور الطوسي، ثم البغدادي، العابد: قال أبو حفص بن شاهين: حدثنا أحمد بن محمد المؤذن، سمعت محمد بن منصور الطوسي، وحواليه قوم، فقالوا: يا أبا جعفر، أيش اليوم عندك، قد شك الناس فيه؟ أيوم عرفة هو أو غيره؟ فقال: اصبروا. فدخل البيت، ثم خرج، فقال: هو يوم عرفة. فاستحيوا أن يقولوا له: من أين ذلك؟ فعدوا الأيام، فكان كما قال. فسمعت أبا بكر بن سلام الوراق يقول له: من أين علمت؟ قال: دخلت،

5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Dr_m_wrd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 258,932 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“محمد الوردي (قناة علمية)” (@Dr_m_wrd), 1,747 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dr_m_wrd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.