Channel
@Double_D_CG
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
154subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002139398526 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Double_D_CG |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Double_D_CG |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 154 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 155 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 156 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 156 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 2 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 44 | 64.7% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 16.2% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 5.88% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤑 Дорогие друзья! 🤑 Этот год выдался очень плодотворным на проекты, на работу. К сожалению, многое нельзя пока показывать. Я выдернул по скрину из проекта (идея свежа и оригинальна, я точно ее не заимствовал у браза фром аза маза) 1-6 изображения - это была очень плодотворная работа вместе с невероятной командой в составе: Креативного продюсера - Владимира Асланиди. Исполнительного продюсера - Макса "Шнейне" Малая…
❤6🔥6🎉3
А где лето? Друзья, давно тут не было постов. Лето было очень плодотворным в плане работы. Проекты сейчас начинают выходить в свет. А это значит, что мне есть, что вам показать. Вчера на презентации нового сезона ИРИ был анонсирован аудиосериал «Гоголь. Страшные сказки». Исполнительный продюсер проекта — мой дорогой друг МАКС МАЛАЙ. Крутой проект. Советую послушать, когда выйдет. И обязательно в наушниках: так можн…
🔥5❤3👏3👍2🎉1
Супер беглый обзор генератора видео от Midjourney Маловероятно, что для кого-то новость, но самый популярный генератор изображений теперь может генерировать видео! В целом, революции не случилось. Реакция скорее: «Ну хорошо, но в целом пофиг» На видео примерах все есть, можете посмотреть. Там те же видео, что и в посте выше про Kling. Невооруженным взглядом видно, что качество генераций проигрывает нынешним генерат…
🔥5👍3
Как и обещал, пост про Kling. А точнее покажу все новые модели и кратко опишу ощущения от других конкурентов. Сейчас в интернете хайпует VEO-3. Так как я люто щелкаю инструменты маркетинга, пост будет не про него. Но в конце скажу пару слов про титана от Google. У Kling сейчас есть следующие модели: 2.1, 2.1 Master, 2.0 Master, 1.6, 1.5 В видео примерах не будет 2.0 Master и 1.5. Старого Мастера рассматривать смыс…
🔥9❤2
Red Bull Недавно генерировал картинки для задачи. В одной из генераций выпало POV изображение. Меня натолкнуло это на мысль проверить, как работают генерации картинок и видео с «такой точки зрения». Картинку получить оказалась задача со звездочкой. Очень часто выходили скорее селфи. Пришлось помимо POV View of … (я знаю что это слово уже содержится в аббревиатуре, поверьте, так выходит лучше). А затем я описывал, ч…
🔥12👏1
"Ты где был?!" "Генерировал" "Странно, но футболка сухая и совсем не пахнет..." Друзья, давненько с вами тут не виделись. Нужно было много разных штук сделать. Многое еще остается в статусе нужно сделать, все постепенно. Некоторое время назад сделал проект для Яндекс Образование, а именно - тизер для их манги. Было 3 выпуска, из которых нужно было сделать некий «динамичный тизер-анонс». Это все, что было. Прочитал…
🔥7
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @Double_D_CG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 100,903 of 1,584,733entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Движение-дизайн (Niklukas)” (@Double_D_CG), 154 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Double_D_CG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.