Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DMG 132 бригада "Беркут"

Channel

DMG 132 бригада "Беркут"

@DonbassMediaGroup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

89,102subscribers

+745 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001497445838
TypeChannel
Username@DonbassMediaGroup
DescriptionСводка в ВК https://vk.com/donbass.media >> Предложить НОВОСТЬ << @DMG_Collector_bot -Оперативная сводка! - Интересные новости. -Во времена прилива вдохновения авторские статьи и картинки. № 6979899358
Created2 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DonbassMediaGroup

Growth

88,35789,10288,729.56 August 2026 — 88,357 subscribers7 August 2026 — 88,378 subscribers8 August 2026 — 88,386 subscribers9 August 2026 — 88,428 subscribers10 August 2026 — 88,463 subscribers11 August 2026 — 88,469 subscribers12 August 2026 — 88,500 subscribers13 August 2026 — 88,544 subscribers14 August 2026 — 88,948 subscribers15 August 2026 — 89,004 subscribers17 August 2026 — 89,102 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +745. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88,245–89,214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 10:1589,102+98
15 Aug 2026, 19:4489,004+56
14 Aug 2026, 12:2888,948+404
13 Aug 2026, 04:3588,544+44
12 Aug 2026, 06:1388,500+31
11 Aug 2026, 09:3588,469+6
10 Aug 2026, 09:3888,463+35
9 Aug 2026, 10:3188,428+42
8 Aug 2026, 08:0588,386+8
7 Aug 2026, 06:4588,378+21
6 Aug 2026, 09:5388,357first reading

Engagement

484 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.01%
avg views ÷ 89,102 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,030
484 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
484
of 484 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 482 of 484 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held484 (6 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total3,887,404
Reactions total21,324
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
51,600
Videos
19,000
Links
7,990

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 15s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

21,324 reactions across 481 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬10,97251.5%
🙏4,62821.7%
😱1,4016.57%
1,3616.38%
👍6803.19%
😢6322.96%
🤡6152.88%
🔥2110.989%
😁2000.938%
💯1450.68%
🤮1350.633%
🤨1050.492%
🕊670.314%
👎650.305%
👌330.155%
🤷‍♂300.141%
😈140.066%
😍110.052%
🫡100.047%
🎉90.042%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 482 of the 484 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,324reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 484 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 484 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DonbassMediaGroup. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 484 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈2,110 views22 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Летает во дворах

🤬16🙏4😱2

17 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈2,860 views17 reactionsread 17 August 2026

❗245 сообщают о дроне

🙏17

17 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈3,020 views38 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Аа, так вот как выглядит народная любовь? Краснодарские ресурсы кишат позитивными комментариями, ни одного негативного не нашел. И это просто бизнесмен, не имеющий никакого отношения к властям. Респект.

27👍6🔥5

17 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈3,290 views15 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Строитель бпла в сторону цгр ❗️

🙏112😱2

17 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈4,580 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🕵‍♂Пропала вещь или нашли чужую? 👇Здесь публикуем объявления о потерях и находках! Быть может, ваш предмет уже нашёлся 🎯

17 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈4,360 views121 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Есть, оказывается, такой Олигарх (именно с большой буквы) Сергей Галицкий... Говорят, краснодарцы от него без ума — это пример миллиардера-патриота, который построил и содержит за свой счёт один из самых красивых парков в мире. Его парк это произведение исскуства. Все таки один в поле - воин. Но очень грустно, что один...

🔥78👍2415💯2🤡2

17 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈5,740 views37 reactionsread 17 August 2026

❗Карло дрон в сторону семидорожек

🤬31🙏6

17 Aug 2026, 09:39 UTC≈6,130 views31 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Сообщают о бпла над Ждановкой ❗️

🤬25🙏41😱1

17 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈6,400 views29 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Сообщают о бпла на Семидорожках ❗️

🤬23🙏51

17 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC≈7,200 views36 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Никитовка фпв ❗

🤬29🙏41🎉1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 484 posts we hold for @DonbassMediaGroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 344,872 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Типичный Донецк
@itsdonetsk · 611,143
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Бої за Нью-Йорк (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…військ»[https://t.me/DonbassMediaGroup/23291 Допис «ДНР» про бої під Нью-Йорком] ([https://web.archive.org/web/20250707081511/https://t.me/DonbassMediaGroup/23291…”
read 16 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DMG 132 бригада "Беркут"” (@DonbassMediaGroup), 89,102 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DonbassMediaGroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.