Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dermatology Updates

Channel

Dermatology Updates

@Dermatology_Updates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,618subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001439684711
TypeChannel
Username@Dermatology_Updates
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dermatology_Updates

Growth

9,5869,6189,60222 August 2026 — 9,586 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,586 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,589 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,593 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,601 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,606 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,618 subscribers22 August 20265 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 14 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,581–9,623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 14:429,618+12
1 Sept 2026, 17:259,606+5
29 Aug 2026, 16:569,601+8
26 Aug 2026, 14:579,593+4
23 Aug 2026, 13:049,589+3
22 Aug 2026, 14:459,586no change
22 Aug 2026, 14:309,586first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 18 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.69%
avg views ÷ 9,618 subscribers
Avg views / post
258
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.199%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held43 (18 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total11,115
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC148 viewsread 29 August 2026

Health is more than avoiding skin cancer https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.70680?af=R

28 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC184 viewsread 29 August 2026

Subscription Information https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(26)02711-9/fulltext?rss=yes

28 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC175 viewsread 29 August 2026

Editorial Board https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(26)02710-7/fulltext?rss=yes

28 Aug 2026, 04:29 UTC170 viewsread 29 August 2026

Table of Contents https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(26)02712-0/fulltext?rss=yes

28 Aug 2026, 04:28 UTC167 viewsread 29 August 2026

Editors’ Picks https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(26)02605-9/fulltext?rss=yes

28 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC143 viewsread 29 August 2026

Clinical Snippets https://www.jidonline.org/article/S0022-202X(26)01308-4/fulltext?rss=yes

26 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC246 viewsread 29 August 2026

Contextualizing the Global Dermatology Workforce https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/2853083

26 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC231 viewsread 29 August 2026

Error in the Figure https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/2853084

26 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC221 viewsread 29 August 2026

Annular and Erosive Plaques on the Back of a Male Patient https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamadermatology/fullarticle/2853085

26 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC248 viewsread 29 August 2026

The promise of oral IL‐23 blockade: One‐year control of high‐impact site psoriasis https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.70593?af=R

26 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC232 viewsread 29 August 2026

Editor’s Picks September 2026 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.70607?af=R

26 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC206 viewsread 29 August 2026

Less is more? Dose reduction of biologics in psoriasis https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.70482?af=R

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Dermatology_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPDATES IN MEDICINE
@Updates_in_Medicine · 47,416
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
Clinical Practice guidelines
@ClinicalPharmGuideline · 60,222
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dermatology Updates” (@Dermatology_Updates), 9,618 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dermatology_Updates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.