Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Emergency medicine updates

Channel

Emergency medicine updates

@Emergency_medicine_Updates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,690subscribers

+293 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001220391312
TypeChannel
Username@Emergency_medicine_Updates
Created27 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Emergency_medicine_Updates

Growth

17,39717,69017,543.520 August 2026 — 17,397 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,418 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,435 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,467 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,475 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,478 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,501 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,517 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,544 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,573 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,585 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,596 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,612 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,630 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,654 subscribers10 September 2026 — 17,690 subscribers20 August 202610 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 20 days, net +293. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,353–17,734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:5917,690+36
6 Sept 2026, 22:4017,654+24
4 Sept 2026, 11:1917,630+18
3 Sept 2026, 01:3817,612+16
1 Sept 2026, 20:1617,596+11
31 Aug 2026, 20:2717,585+12
30 Aug 2026, 20:3617,573+29
29 Aug 2026, 19:1117,544+27
28 Aug 2026, 17:1617,517+16
27 Aug 2026, 19:2717,501+23
26 Aug 2026, 18:4417,478+3
25 Aug 2026, 19:3717,475+8
24 Aug 2026, 18:1317,467+32
22 Aug 2026, 23:5417,435+17
21 Aug 2026, 15:0517,418+21
20 Aug 2026, 23:4517,397first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 11 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.62%
avg views ÷ 17,690 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,170
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.114%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held35 (11 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total40,968
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1292.3%
👏17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC434 viewsread 3 September 2026

Impact of Transitioning From Application‐Specific to Global Point‐of‐Care Ultrasound Privileging on Utilization and Emergency Department Length of Stay https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acem.70404?af=R Academic Emergency Medicine, Volume 33, Issue 9, September 2026.

2 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC438 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026

A National Study of Tetanus Vaccine Knowledge, Receipt and Acceptance Among Emergency Department Patients https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acem.70401?af=R Academic Emergency Medicine, Volume 33, Issue 9, September 2026.

2 Sept 2026, 08:46 UTC438 viewsread 3 September 2026

Trends in Thrombolysis in Stroke (2015–2024) https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acem.70407?af=R Academic Emergency Medicine, Volume 33, Issue 9, September 2026.

31 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC480 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Updates_in_MedicinePhoto

https://www.instagram.com/updates_in_medicine?igsi=eWJ2N3p2MmxvNXJ0&utm_source=qr

29 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC971 viewsread 3 September 2026

Issue Information https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acem.70335?af=R Academic Emergency Medicine, Volume 33, Issue 9, September 2026.

29 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 3 September 2026

Clinical outcomes of “massive” acetaminophen overdose treated with standard vs. augmented dose acetylcysteine https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2026.2709730?af=R

29 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC834 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Medication errors in home care settings: a 13-year retrospective cohort study in the Ramathibodi Poison Center https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2026.2712465?af=R

28 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC887 viewsread 3 September 2026

Cyanide toxicity following an amygdalin and coffee “parasite cleanse” https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2026.2722075?af=R

28 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC825 viewsread 3 September 2026

Clinical suspicion versus toxicological findings in psychoactive substance poisonings: evidence from emergency cases in Brazil (2023–2024) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2026.2714934?af=R

27 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 3 September 2026

Organophosphate pesticide poisoning: benefits and limitations of oxime therapy https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2026.2707976?af=R

26 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 3 September 2026

Transient hepatic portal venous gas and gastric emphysema following ingestion of hydrogen peroxide and peroxyacetic acid https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2026.2718880?af=R

26 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 3 September 2026

Acute iron toxicity following therapeutic intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in chronic liver dysfunction https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15563650.2026.2695234?af=R

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Emergency_medicine_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

THE WHITE ARMY
@whitearmyofmedicos · 102,166
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
Clinical Practice guidelines
@ClinicalPharmGuideline · 60,386
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Hakimed: Medical Resources
@HakimApps_Guideline · 31,668
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Internal Medicine Videos & books
@medicinevideoss · 103,117
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
UPDATES IN MEDICINE
@Updates_in_Medicine · 47,523
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
Medical Guidelines 2025_2026
@Mmmmmm221234 · 35,735
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
Medical Books
@MedicalBooksStoreA · 41,993
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 29 August 2026
Polite Doctor🩺
@skills_first · 42,326
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 29 August 2026
Internal Medicine
@inter_first · 29,591
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
Internal Medicine - Medicina Interna
@loacro01 · 30,650
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
Medical Mnemonics
@medical_mnemonics · 61,589
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 26 August 2026
Medicina Interna & Medicina Crítica & Emergencias.Artículos actualizados.
@medicinaIntern · 41,051
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 August 2026
Boards and Beyond 2024
@Boards_Beyond_videos · 40,740
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
internal medicine
@easymedicine7 · 29,380
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
MBBS Materials by Dr MediRobot
@mbbsmaterials · 67,505
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
Artículos médicos Twitter
@articulosmedicosdelMedtwitter · 51,794
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
PDFology
@PDFology · 66,838
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Medinternafacil 🤓🩺
@medinternafacil · 61,892
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
Artículos Médicos - Luis, el intensivista
@luiselintensivista · 74,130
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Clinical Notes
@Clinical_Notes · 39,386
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Emergency medicine updates” (@Emergency_medicine_Updates), 17,690 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Emergency_medicine_Updates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.