Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Neurology Updates

Channel

Neurology Updates

@Neurology_Updates

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,061subscribers

+197 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001499239475
TypeChannel
Username@Neurology_Updates
DescriptionAll the atest articles, research and news from worlds leading Neurology Journals. Discussion group https://t.me/Professional_Medical_Discussion
CreatedBetween 1 November 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Neurology_Updates

Growth

15,86416,06115,962.56 August 2026 — 15,864 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,864 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,875 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,882 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,890 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,902 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,908 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,934 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,953 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,968 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,982 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,992 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,002 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,022 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,037 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,061 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +197. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,834–16,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 22:2616,061+24
21 Aug 2026, 09:2316,037+15
20 Aug 2026, 09:2716,022+20
19 Aug 2026, 11:5616,002+10
18 Aug 2026, 13:4515,992+10
17 Aug 2026, 12:2515,982+14
16 Aug 2026, 01:5615,968+15
14 Aug 2026, 09:2715,953+19
12 Aug 2026, 22:1715,934+26
11 Aug 2026, 23:0515,908+6
10 Aug 2026, 20:1315,902+12
9 Aug 2026, 21:2115,890+8
9 Aug 2026, 00:5315,882+7
8 Aug 2026, 01:3115,875+11
7 Aug 2026, 00:0015,864no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:5615,864first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.33%
avg views ÷ 16,061 subscribers
Avg views / post
857
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.117%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held37 (30 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total31,691
Reactions total10
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
53
Videos
2
Links
8,840

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC729 viewsread 22 August 2026

Strong and localized recurrence controls the dimensionality of neural activity across brain areas https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02395-w

19 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTC693 viewsread 22 August 2026

Cortical thickness changes precede high levels of amyloid by at least 7 years https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02363-4

17 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC865 viewsread 22 August 2026

Anti-CD320 Autoantibodies and CNS Vitamin B 12 Deficiency in Idiopathic Myelopathy https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2853049

17 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC817 viewsread 22 August 2026

A Call for Benzodiazepines in Airline Emergency Medical Kits https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2853048

17 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC684 viewsread 22 August 2026

Safety of Antiseizure Medication During DOAC Therapy in Epilepsy https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2853050

17 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC728 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Microglia activation by derepression of endogenous retroviruses drives inflammation and cellular senescence https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02404-y

1

17 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC689 viewsread 22 August 2026

Reusable modular architecture enables flexible cognitive operations in the mouse brain and artificial recurrent networks https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02410-0

13 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 22 August 2026

Dendritic translation and neuroproteasome-mediated degradation of endogenous tau revealed by STARFISH https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02398-7

12 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC≈1,150 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Error in Title https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2852959

1

12 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 22 August 2026

Cross-region neuron co-firing mediated by ripple oscillations supports distributed working memory representations https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02403-z

11 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 22 August 2026

Modeling maternal immune activation in 3D ex vivo human fetal brain cerebroids reveals IL-17A-driven disruption of cortical development https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02400-2

11 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 22 August 2026

Susumu Tonegawa (1939–2026) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-026-02416-8

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @Neurology_Updates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Clinical Practice guidelines
@ClinicalPharmGuideline · 59,739
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026
Artículos Médicos - Luis, el intensivista
@luiselintensivista · 72,952
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Medinternafacil 🤓🩺
@medinternafacil · 61,823
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Neurology Updates” (@Neurology_Updates), 16,061 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Neurology_Updates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.