6 Sept 2022, 13:04 UTCviews —
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 9 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
Channel
Daru al-Uloom
@DarulalUloom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
324subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001098878279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DarulalUloom |
| Created | 19 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DarulalUloom |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 324 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 325 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 324 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 324 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 323 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 December 2018 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 September 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
16 Aug 2022, 07:30 UTCviews —
The account of the user that owns this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If it remains inactive in the next 30 days, that account will self-destruct and this channel may no longer have an owner.
6 Mar 2021, 16:31 UTC≈3,140 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @RiddaKufr
Ридда | "те кто впал Ридду, то он не оправдан"! Сказал аль-Коды Ияд: وهذا كله فى الأحكام الشرعية وما لا يتعلق بأصل وقاعدة من أصول التوحيد وقواعد التوحيد ، مما مبناه على قواطع الأدلة القطعية ، فإن الخطأ فى هذا غير موضوع ، والحق فيها فى طرف واحد بإجماع من أرباب الأصول ...Ведь истинно, ошибка в этом не прощается, и истина в этой категории вопросов - в одном, по единогласному мнению специалистов по усулю! См......: "…
26 Jan 2021, 06:01 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 6 August 2026
Сказал Хафиз Ибн Касир «Приверженцу нововведений трудно жить в том месте, где много Ханбалитов». См.....: "Аль-Бидая ва ан-Нихая" Канал на телеграмм, https://t.me/Abu_Nuaym_Al_Khupri
10 Nov 2019, 11:09 UTC≈3,380 viewsread 6 August 2026
✅ Таклид за учёными 📝 Что делать простолюдину, если ученые разногласят? 🔵 Сказал имам Абу Абдуллах аз-Зубейри аш- Шафи'и: •Если кто-то скажет: "Что вы скажете о том кто просит фетву из простолюдинов, если ему дали фетву двое муфтиев и их фетвы противоречат друг другу? Делать ли ему таклид? Будет сказано: это инша Аллах делится на два варианта Первый: если простолюдин из тех, у кого широкий разум, и его понимание …
16 Jun 2019, 10:04 UTC≈2,720 viewsread 6 August 2026
✅ Дуа бывает двух видов 🔵 Сказал имам Хафиз Ибн Таймия Аль-Ханбали приведя 55 и 56 аяты суры «Возвышенности», он пишет: هاتان الآيتان مشتملتان على آداب نوعي الدعاء دعاء العبادة ودعاء المسألة فإن الدعاء في القرآن يراد به هذا تارة وهذا تارة ، ويراد به مجموعهما «Эти два Аята содержат в себе указание на два вида дуа — Дуа как поклонение (дуа-ибадат) и дуа как просьба (дуа-масаля). И когда в Коране говорится о дуа, то …
2 Feb 2019, 13:14 UTC≈2,440 viewsread 6 August 2026
Новые канали на телеграмм 1. «Маратиб аль-Иджма'». https://t.me/Maratib_al_ijma 2. «Захиритский Фикх» (с доводами) https://t.me/Zakharetskyi_fiqh 3. «Ихтиляф аимати Уляма» https://t.me/Ikhtilaf_al_Ulama Стан ключём к добру поделиться с друзьями.
29 Jan 2019, 11:22 UTC≈2,070 viewsread 6 August 2026
✅ ан-Навави - что мнение захиритов не берётся в расчёт! 🔵 Сказал имам аш-Шаукани: «Непринятия в расчёт разногласия с Даудом, несмотря на его знание, набожность и то, что большие имамы следовали его мазхабу – это из числа фанатизма, не имеющего основы, кроме страсти и слепой приверженности»! 📚 Источник: [Найлюль-Аутар, 1/103] © Канал «Даруль Улюм» на телеграм, https://telegram.me/DarulalUloom
29 Jan 2019, 11:15 UTC≈1,910 viewsread 6 August 2026
✅ Касательно принятия в расчёт мазхаба Захиритов Игнорировали его в основном поздние представители некоторых мазхабов, тогда как ранние имамы из числа представителей всех мазхабов считались с основателем мазхаба захиритов – Даудом ибн ‘Али аз-Захири. Упоминая о том, что некоторые имамы не брали в расчёт мнения захиритов, как Дауда и Ибн Хазма. 🔵 Сказал Хафиз аз-Захаби аш-Шафии: «Мы не видели, чтобы они (саляфы) во…
29 Jan 2019, 10:33 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 6 August 2026
✅ Разногласие в определении достоверности хадисов 🔵 Сказал Хафиз ас-Суюти аш-Шафии: وقد يختلفون في صحة بعض الأحاديث ، لاختلافهم في وجود هذه الأوصاف فيه ، أو لاختلافهم في اشتراط بعضها وهو ما اتصل سنده بالعدول الضابطين من غير شذوذ ولا علة حد الخطابي الصحيح بأنه : ما اتصل سنده وعدلت نقلته ، قال العراقي : فلم يشترط ضبط الراوي ولا السلامة من الشذوذ والعلة ، «Причина, из-за которой правоведы не соглашаются друг с друго…
27 Jan 2019, 10:58 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 6 August 2026
Уважаемые братья и сестры мусульмане. Мы ин ша Аллах приняли решение переводить книгу имама Ибн Хазма аль-Андалуси ум. 456 г.х. под названием «Маратиб аль-Иджма'». Нажмите здесь ➡️ https://t.me/Maratib_al_ijma ⬅️
1 Jan 2019, 13:18 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 6 August 2026
✅ Имам Хафиз Ибн Хазм – Высказывания ученых о нем: 🔵 Сказал имам Хафиз ас-Суюты аш Шафии: وقال جلال الدين السيوطي: كان صاحب فنون وورع وزهد وإليه المنتهى في الذكاء والحفظ وسعة الدائرة في العلوم أجمع أهل الأندلس قاطبة لعلوم الإسلام وأوسعهم مع توسعه في علوم اللسان والبلاغة والشعر والسير والأخبار. ( انظر : طبقات الحفاظ، ص435 ،436) «Он был обладателем Наук, богобоязненности, Аскетизма который достиг предела в остроум…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DarulalUloom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 676,972 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@DarulalUloom named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@abu_nuaym_al_khupri
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daru al-Uloom” (@DarulalUloom), 324 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DarulalUloom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.