Channel
@Kriminal_Kavkaz
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,107subscribers
+93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001344084288 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Kriminal_Kavkaz |
| Description | Присаживайтесь поближе, что-то расскажу ... |
| Created | 24 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Kriminal_Kavkaz |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
7,820 average views per post against 8,107 subscribers — an engagement rate of 96.4%. Across the 39,511 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,163–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.96% and 25.5%, with a median of 13.7%.
| Window | 30 days (19 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 85,980 |
| Mature posts only | 96.4% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 8,107 measured 16 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:rus · 39,511 channels · p10 3.40% · p25 6.96% · p50 13.7% · p75 25.5% · p90 42.0% |
| Position in cohort | 99.026th percentile · 7.0× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.05% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 8,107 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 8,115 | +114 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 8,001 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 8,012 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 8,014 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (1 July 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 79,520 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Житель Санкт-Петербурга арестован на Ставрополье по подозрению в подготовке теракта По заданию кураторов злоумышленник прибыл в Ставрополь и осуществлял наблюдение за транспортными и промышленными объектами, а также планировал поджог железнодорожных цистерн с горюче-смазочными материалами. Лицо задержано сотрудниками УФСБ России по Ставропольскому краю. Подозреваемый в июне 2026 году вступил в ряды запрещенной в РФ…
ФСБ сообщила о задержании и аресте жителя Крыма за передачу СБУ сведений о системе ПВО полуострова, а также подготовке терактов на объектах железнодорожной инфраструктуры. По данным спецслужбы, 55-летний житель Бахчисарайского района Республики Крым установил контакт с представителем Службы безопасности Украины и передавал ему сведения о дислокации воинских частей, военной техники, расположении средств ПВО. Кроме т…
ФСБ сообщила о задержании и аресте мужчины, который по заданию украинских спецслужб планировал подрыв автомобиля сотрудника военного комиссариата в Краснодарском крае. "Федеральной службой безопасности Российской Федерации в Краснодарском крае предотвращен террористический акт, планировавшийся по заданию украинских спецслужб путем убийства офицера министерства обороны Российской Федерации", - сообщил в среду Центр о…
Южный окружной военный суд в Ростове-на-Дону признал жителя Карачаево-Черкессии Алексея Каплунова виновным в передаче террористам информации о сотрудниках колонии в Ставропольском крае и заключенных, отправленных на СВО, сообщили в пресс-службе суда. Установлено, что, отбывая наказание в исправительном учреждении в Ставропольском крае, Каплунов в июне 2024 года вступил в переписку с представителем запрещенной в РФ т…
📢📢📢 В Малгобеке завершено расследование уголовного дела о публичном оправдании терроризма Следственным отделом по городу Малгобек следственного управления Следственного комитета Российской Федерации по Республике Ингушетия завершено расследование уголовного дела в отношении 19-летнего жителя города Малгобек, он обвиняется в совершении преступления, предусмотренного ч. 2 ст. 205.2 УК РФ (публичное оправдание террориз…
25-летний парень планировал подорвать здание прокуратуры в Пятигорске Выходец из Центральной Азии действовал по указке кураторов из Сирии, провел разведку и купил взрывчатку. Далее злоумышленник планировал выехать в соседнее государство и вступить в ряды запрещенной на территории РФ террористической организации. Однако довести задуманное до логического завершения у него не получилось: теракт предотвратили силовики. …
Севастопольский городской суд вынес приговор 66-летнему местному жителю, обвиняемому в государственной измене и хранении взрывного устройства Подсудимый приговорен к 18 годам лишения свободы в исправительной колонии строгого режима со штрафом в размере 400 тыс. рублей и с последующим ограничением свободы сроком на 1 год. Суд установил, что обвиняемого в декабре 2022 года, когда тот находился на Украине, завербовал …
«Благодарю всех военных моряков за службу и вклад в укрепление морской мощи нашей страны. С праздником вас!» Президент отметил, что навыки морпехов, их стойкость, смелость и дерзость во многом определяют ход СВО. @rabotaembrat
В Санкт-Петербурге задержан администратор экстремистского канала «Джамаат Дагестана» Длительное время уроженца Избербаша не могли поймать. В деструктивном телеграм-канале он распространял материалы, которые оправдывали и пропагандировали терроризм, в том числе в интересах Украины. Канал имел более 5 тыс. подписчиков. Возбуждено уголовное дело по статье 205.2 (публичные призывы к осуществлению терроризма) УК РФ, а т…
Федеральной службой безопасности РФ в Ставропольском крае пресечена попытка теракта в отношении участника специальной военной операции. "При попытке реализации преступного плана задержан гражданин России, 1977 г.р., причастный к подготовке теракта на участника СВО", - сообщили в Центре общественных связей ФСБ РФ. По данным спецслужбы, задержанный дает признательные показания. По данным ФСБ, установлено, что подозр…
Вопрос дня от читателей «Блокнота»: где губернатор? Подписчики заметили, что Владимира Владимирова не видели на месте ЧП, а его доклады в соцсетях — не во всем соответствуют ситуации. На территориях происшествий работают службы и главы муниципалитетов, по данным журналистов, самого первого лица региона там нет, а работу курирует один из его замов. — Ему некогда. Какие БПЛА, такая мелочь. Он наверное поехал места по…
15-летнего подростка задержали в Курске за попытку присоединиться к террористам. Как сообщил СК, школьник в мае вступил в переписку с неизвестным, который представился членом запрещенной террористической организации. Ему подросток заявил, что хочет вступить в группировку и готов помогать ей. На юношу завели дело по статье о приготовлении к участию в деятельности террористической организации, решается вопрос об арес…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Kriminal_Kavkaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 636,546 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Kriminal_Kavkaz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Криминальный КаVкаZ” (@Kriminal_Kavkaz), 8,107 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Kriminal_Kavkaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.