• تيقن أن سؤال “شنو يعني فهرست ؟” راح يبقى سؤال أزلي وجودي، لا يقل عمقًا عن سؤال “ما معنى الحياة؟”
• البوت للابلاغ عن خلل او مشكلة : @klawatx_links_bot
• تم عمل الفهرست بايدي طلابية من قنوات التدحرج
• اللهم صلِ على محمد وآل محمد وعجل فرجهم
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
54 measurements spanning 88 days, net -1,498. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,765–12,019 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 54
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 07:38
10,025
-10
4 Nov 2026, 09:19
10,035
-11
2 Nov 2026, 14:25
10,046
-13
1 Nov 2026, 14:39
10,059
-8
31 Oct 2026, 12:37
10,067
-7
29 Oct 2026, 11:50
10,074
-10
28 Oct 2026, 07:27
10,084
-5
27 Oct 2026, 05:57
10,089
-11
26 Oct 2026, 06:27
10,100
-14
25 Oct 2026, 04:55
10,114
-27
24 Oct 2026, 04:25
10,141
-5
23 Oct 2026, 01:29
10,146
-18
21 Oct 2026, 23:07
10,164
-25
20 Oct 2026, 18:47
10,189
-8
19 Oct 2026, 20:27
10,197
-14
18 Oct 2026, 21:28
10,211
-6
17 Oct 2026, 22:19
10,217
-29
16 Oct 2026, 19:37
10,246
-7
15 Oct 2026, 20:56
10,253
-9
14 Oct 2026, 20:16
10,262
first reading
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 10,025 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,120
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held
25 (24 April 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total
2,120
Reactions total
39
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 20:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
34
Videos
3
Links
52
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,349 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😭
1,932
36.1%
❤🔥
1,745
32.6%
🔥
900
16.8%
🤯
516
9.65%
🫡
127
2.37%
🙏
59
1.10%
🥰
46
0.86%
😍
24
0.449%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,349 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
4 شخصيات ذكاء اصطناعي.. مقهى سج تنافسي.. إنضمام الثالث متوسط والمتميزين والادبي.. متجر ملازم وقرطاسية.. وزاريات وادوات انتاجية ذكية
شغل طويل وتغييرات جذرية صارت على بنية التطبيق باحدث مستوى حتى تشوفون تجربة تليق بيكم لدرجة حتى الاسم اخذ شكل جديد
اهم نقطة بهذا التحديث هي رجعة ميزات الذكاء الاصطناعي بعد شهرين من الشغل والتطوير المستمر حتى نواكب احدث ما وصل له العالم
سوينا اربع شخصيات تفاعلية تفهم طالب السادس بكل تفاص…
⭐ فهرست الفهرست :
🔍شنو هو الفهرست؟ : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الاسلامية : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الفرنسي : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست القواعد : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الادب : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الانكليزي : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الاحياء : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الرياضيات : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الكيمياء : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الفيزياء : دوس هنا
🔍 فهرست الاختبارات : دوس هنا
🔎 الملازم الوزارية : دوس هنا
تزامناً مع ختام امتحانات دفعة 26 ، تم اطلاق التحديث الأخير لتطبيق دحرجة لهاي الدفعة.. إضافات ضخمة وميزات قوية كهدية بسيطة نختتم بيها هذا الموسم الدراسي.
أبرز الإضافات بالتحديث الجديد:
- استوديو الذكاء الاصطناعي: أدوات ذكية لتوليد الامتحانات، الخرائط الذهنية، بطاقات المراجعة، وتلخيص المواضيع، مع اضافة شخصية "فضفضة" الي راح يكون رفيق دراسي ومرشد تستيشره باي شي يخص دراستك وجداولك والخ.
- قسم الوزاريات: إضافة وزاريات …
بعد مرور أسبوعين، وصل عدد مستخدمي تطبيق دحرجة قرابة الـ 20 الف مستخدم، كل هذا واحنا بعدنا ما اطلقنا نسخة الـ iOS (اللي قريباً راح تكون مليئة بالمفاجئات 🤫)
بهالمناسبة، تم نشر هالفيديو اللي سولفنا بي عن قصة دحرجة وهدفها بدقيقتين
https://youtu.be/jXuCciYFPtA?si=1PDvSJhW9EQltheV
وفعلنا بوت الدعم : @Dahrja_bot
السلام عليكم
جهود مباركة في اخراج تطبيق دحرجة تطبيق اقل ما يقال عنه انه كامل من كل النواحي وخاصة الذكاء الاصطناعي والاجابة يلي ينطيها جربت كل شيء فيه وما اكول غير بالعافية علينا وعلى الدفعات القادمة وجود هذا التطبيق ووجود هذه الشخصيات يلي اخرجت لنا هذا التطبيق شكرا جزيلا فريق دحرجة وجزاكم الله خير الجزاء
(بس يضل الفهرست الاول )
سقط جسر الفهرست، كل الملاحظات مال فهرست صارت بالتطبيق
🔥181🤯25🥰9😍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @KLAWATX_LINKS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دحرجة @Dahrja · 19,304 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 30 September 2026
🖤 فِكر إيجابي @fikregaby65 · 63,135 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فهرست التدحرج” (@KLAWATX_LINKS), 10,025 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KLAWATX_LINKS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.