Channel
@DRS0nline
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004424914631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DRS0nline |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 1 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DRS0nline |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 52 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:54 | 54 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 57 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 53 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 54 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 51 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 51 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
53 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 24 | 45.3% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 22.6% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.77% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
العمر فرصة واحدة.. لا تتكرر! ⏳ من المرعب حقًا أن تدرك أن كل هذه الحياة، بكل ما فيها، إنما نعيشها لمرة واحدة فقط.. بلا رجعة ولا إعادة! فتحنا أعيننا فجأة على هذا العالم، وسنغمضها يومًا ما فجأة دون أي موعد مسبق. وفي كل صباح نستيقظ فيه، نكون على موعد محتمل مع نهاية الرحلة.. فكل شيء في هذه الحياة قابل للتعديل والتراجع، إلا الموت! لذا، عليك أن تختار مسارك بذكاء، فهذه تجريبتك الوحيدة. أفكر أحيانًا: ماذا لو كان للإنسان أ…
🌙 Davomi… Nega Shayx ar-Rais Ibn Sino ko’p tunlarni bedor o’tkazar edi? Shayx Husam Ramazon hafizahulloh bu haqda qiziqarli bir voqeani zikr qiladilar. «وَالشَّيْخُ الرَّئِيسُ رَحِمَهُ اللَّهُ كَانَ يَحْتَاجُ إِلَى السَّهَرِ كَثِيرًا؛ لِأَنَّ الْأَوْقَاتَ لَا تَكْفِي.» “Shayx ar-Rais ko’p bedor bo’lishga muhtoj edi. Chunki shuncha ilmni o'rganishga vaqt yetmas edi.” Bu so’z ilm ahlining vaqtga qanday munosabatd…
🔥3
“Shayx Husam Ramazon hafizahulloh aytadilar:” ☕ Nega ulamolar qahvani qadrlashgan? Ilm ahli orasida qahva oddiy ichimlik emas, balki ilm va ibodat yo’lida yordamchi vositalardan biri sifatida e’tirof etilgan. Shuning uchun ba’zi ulamolar shunday deganlar: «عَلَيْكَ بِشُرْبِ الْقَهْوَةِ، فَفِيهَا خَمْسُ فَوَائِدَ: نَشَاطٌ، وَإِهْضَامٌ، وَقَطْعُ بَلْغَمٍ، وَنُورُ إِبْصَارٍ، وَعَوْنٌ لِعَابِدٍ.» “Qahva ich. Unda b…
❤2
📌 Xatoni unuting, saboqni esda saqlang Hayotimiz xatolar, omadsizliklar va qiyinchiliklarga to'la. Lekin bizga hech kim og'riqlar va tushkunlikni unutmang deb o'rgatmagan. 🎓 Har bir og'riq — bu saboq: Qadimda bir faylasuf 30 yil asirlikda yashab: "Bu men uchun fojia emas, balki dunyoqarshimni o'zgartirgan va menga ko'p narsa o'rgatgan eng katta imkoniyat bo'ldi", degan ekan. ✨ Qum ichidagi oltin: Oltin izlovc…
👍1
Taqdir sirini bila olmaysan... Sabrning boshlanishi esa — Taslim boʻlishdir.» Nega hayotimiz chigallashib ketadi? Chunki biz narsalarni boricha qabul qilmay, hammasi faqat oʻz xohishimizcha boʻlishini istaymiz. Aslida esa hammasi ancha sodda: 1. Qalbingni natijaga bogʻlab qoʻyma! Muvaffaqiyat, uylanish, boylik yoki salomatlik — harakatingni qil, lekin boʻlmasa, fojia qilma. Barchasi oʻtib ketadi va hal…
❤2👍1🔥1
Ilmning siri faqatgina — iste'dod emas, sobitqadamlik ««العلم لا يحتاج منك إلا عزيمة صارمة، واستمرارا لا ينقطع، وصدقا وجِدًّا في الطلب...»» Ko'pchilik ilm yo'liga endigina kirar ekan, o'ziga shunday hukm chiqaradi: "Menda iste'dod yo'q, demak, katta olim bo'la olmayman." Aslida esa bu eng katta xatolardan biridir. Shayxul Azhar Abdul Halim Mahmud rahimahulloh o'z xotiralarida bolaligini g'ayrioddiy qilib tasvi…
👍2👏1
📚 Nabaviy siyratni o‘rganish uchun eng muhim manbalar: Rasululloh ﷺning muborak hayotlarini chuqur o‘rganishni istagan har bir musulmon quyidagi manbalarga murojaat qilishi lozim: 🌿 1. القرآن الكريم Qur'oni karim – Nabaviy siyratning eng ulug‘, eng sahih va eng ishonchli manbai. 🌿 2. كتب السنة النبوية Hadis kitoblari – Rasululloh ﷺning so‘zlari, amallari va taqrirlarini jamlagan manbalar. 🌿 3. كتب السيرة والم…
👍2❤1
Sahobalardan o‘rganamiz: Va'da va rag‘bat Abdulloh ibn Umar roziyallohu anhumo molidan yoqtirgan narsasini Alloh yo‘lida sadaqa qilar edilar. Xizmatkorlari buni bilib, ibodatga va masjidga qatnashni ko‘paytirishardi. Shunda u zot ularni ozod qilardilar. Bir kuni: — Ular sizni aldayapti, — deyishganda, u zot: > "Kim bizni Alloh nomi bilan aldasa, biz unga aldangandek muomala qilamiz", — dedilar. Bu voqea tarb…
👍2🔥2❤1
Kufaliklarning "zoʻriqishi" va Basraliklarning sodda yondashishi. Arab tili grammatikasida (Nahvda) ikki buyuk maktab bor: Basra va Kufa. Ularning har bir masalaga yondashuvi goʻyoki ikki xil dunyoqarash. Keling, bugun darsliklarimizda tez-tez uchraydigan "وفِي هَذَا مِنَ التَّكَلُّفِ مَا لَيْسَ يَخْفَى" (Bunda yashirib boʻlmas zoʻriqish bor) degan iboraning ortidagi qiziqarli ilmiy bahsni koʻrib chiqamiz. Mavz…
❤1👍1
Sobitlik — mardlarning ziynati إذا همَّ بالأعداء لم تثنِ همَّهُ غزالٌ عليها نظمُ دُرٍّ يزينها نهته فلما لم ترَ النهيَ عاقَهُ بكت فبكى مما شجاها قطينها ولم يثنه إيماضها وابتسامها ولا حين جادت بالدموع شؤونها ولكن مضى ذا مِرَّةٍ متشبثًا بسنةِ حقٍّ واضحٍ يستبينها. ✍ كُثيِّر عزّة Mazmuni: Shoir shunday bir insonni tasvirlaydiki, u haq yo'lida qat'iy qaror qilgan. Uni na go'zal ma'shuqaning husni, na tabassumi, na ko'z…
👍1
Ibn Malik metodikasi Alfiyani oʻqir ekansiz, Imom Ibn Malikning dars berish uslubidagi mantiqiy goʻzallikka qoyil qolasiz. U zot kitob sarlavhasida birinchi boʻlib sharafli va asl qoida boʻlgani uchun Mo'rab ismlarni zikr qiladi (المعرب والمبني من الأسماء). Biroq, bitta-bitta ta’riflashga kelganda, mo'rabni qoʻyib, birinchi boʻlib Mabniy ismlarni mukammal tushuntiradi. Nega bilasizmi? Chunki mabniy ismlar…
❤1👍1
Nahvdagi shartlar fiqh ilmidagi sabab hisoblanadi. Bu nozik va qimmatli qoidani Shihab al-Din al-Qarafi, va boshqa ulamolar zikr qilganlar. Qoidaning mazmuni shuki: Fiqh va usul al-fiqh istilohida "shart" (الشرط) — bir narsaning mavjud bo‘lishi unga bog‘liq bo‘lgan, ammo o‘zi o‘sha narsaning tarkibiy qismi bo‘lmagan bo‘lmagan narsadir. Masalan, tahorat namozning shartidir. Namozning to‘g‘ri bo‘lishi tahoratg…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DRS0nline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Muhammad Ma'sum” (@DRS0nline), 52 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DRS0nline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.