Video message, posted without a caption
❤4👍3🔥3👏1🕊1🤩1🥰1

Channel
@MuhammadAli_Muhiddin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
568subscribers
+65 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003823611377 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MuhammadAli_Muhiddin |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 21 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MuhammadAli_Muhiddin |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 568 | -18 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:42 | 586 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 607 | +120 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 487 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 486 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 503 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 503 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
350 reactions across 17 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 115 | 32.9% | |
| 🔥 | 90 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 43 | 12.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 20 | 5.71% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 4.29% | |
| 🤩 | 13 | 3.71% | |
| 😍 | 12 | 3.43% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 3.14% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 2.86% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.71% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.857% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.857% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.857% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 0.571% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.571% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.571% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4👍3🔥3👏1🕊1🤩1🥰1
Masjid imomi juma namozidan so‘ng «Kahf» surasini jamoatga tajvid bilan o‘qishni o‘rgatmoqda... 📌«Amr ibn Os» masjidi, Qohira.
❤3🔥3🥰2🌚1🤩1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥4🕊2🌚1👍1🥰1😍1
O‘z fikringizni nafaqat to‘g‘ri, balki ta’sirchan va go‘zal ifoda etishni xohlaysizmi? 🫵 U holda bu imkoniyat aynan siz uchun! Biz sizni Sobiq Azhar Universiteti rektori, buyuk alloma Doktor Ibrohim Hudhud (hafizahulloh) qalamiga mansub arab bo‘lmaganlar uchun «Yengillashtirilgan balog‘at» kitobi asosidagi noyob intensiv kursga taklif etamiz. ⚠️Nima uchun aynan ushbu kurs? ✅ Yengillashtirilgan yondashuv: Balog…
❤7😍6🔥5😢1
👍👍👍 👍👍👍 🆕 Sizlar uchun ajoyib yangilik. 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 50ta reaksiya bilan e'lon qilamiz. 🤔 Yangi kursimiz nima haqida deb o'ylaysiz, kommentariyada o'z fikringizni qoldiring? @MuhammadAli_Muhiddin
🔥25❤9👍9🥰1
☕ Nega ulamolar qahvani qadrlashgan? Shayx Husam Ramazon hafizahulloh aytadilar: Ilm ahli orasida qahva oddiy ichimlik emas, balki ilm va ibodat yo’lida yordamchi vositalardan biri sifatida e’tirof etilgan. Shuning uchun ba’zi ulamolar shunday deganlar: «عَلَيْكَ بِشُرْبِ الْقَهْوَةِ، فَفِيهَا خَمْسُ فَوَائِدَ: نَشَاطٌ، وَإِهْضَامٌ، وَقَطْعُ بَلْغَمٍ، وَنُورُ إِبْصَارٍ، وَعَوْنٌ لِعَابِدٍ» «Qahva ich. Unda besh …
❤10👍6🔥4💯3🤗3
Ulamolar aytishadi: «Ikki oqsoq kishi bo‘lmaganida Qur‘onning balog‘ati zoe bo‘lardi». P.s Bu yerdagi ikki oqsoq kishidan murod imom Zamaxshariy va imom Sakkokiy nazarda tutilgan. Ikkala imom ham Qur‘ondagi balog‘atni o‘z kitoblarida amaliy tarzda ochib berganlar va balog‘at faniga tamal toshlarni qo‘yganlar. Eng e‘tiborlisi esa ikkalalari ham asli arab bo‘lmaganlar. Bu albatta Allohning fazli, Alloh taolo esa fazli…
❤🔥7❤3🔥3
E’LON! 📢 ❓Tolibi ilm qanday qilib buyuk darajalarga yetadi, buni o'rganmoqchimisiz? Unda bu e'lon siz uchun! ❗️"Ta'limul Muta'allim" kitobidan kursni e'lon qilamiz❗️ 🎓Bu kursda "Ta'limul Muta'allim" kitobi ONLINE VIDEO CHATDA to'liq o'qib o'rgatilinadi. 💻👨🏫 Kursga qo'shilish sharti: Arab tilida o'qib tushuna olish malakasi bo'lish.📖 💡 Kurs Tafsilotlari: Kurs davomiyligi: ±2 oy. ⏳ Darslar soni: ±24 ta jonli dar…
❤4
Allohning qo‘shnisi alloma imom Zamaxshariy kim edi? Imom Zamaxshariy boshqa arab tili olimlaridan ajrab turadigan fazli u zot arab tilining barcha ilmlarida imomlik* darajasiga yetgan olim bo‘lgan: 1) Nahv ilmida imom, 2) Sarf ilmida imom, 3) Lug‘at ilmida imom, 4) She‘riyat ilmida imom 5) Aruz (Vazn va qofiya) ilmida imom, 6) Ishtiqoq ilmida imom, 7) Bayon ilmida imom, 8) Ma‘oniy ilmida imom, 9) Badi‘ ilmida imom…
🔥9❤7❤🔥2🤯1
#Allohning_chegarasi Tasavvur qil yo'lda ketyapsan to‘satdan qarshingda: «Oldinga yurish taqiqlanadi, minalashtirilgan hudud», degan peshtaxta chiqdi. Shu payt sen ana shu ogohlantiruvchi belgini o‘rnatganga tashakkurlar ayta boshlaysan. U meni ozodligimni cheklayapti, degan o‘y hayolingni bir chetiga ham kelmaydi, balki u seni omonliging garovi bo‘lganini e‘tirof etasan. Huddi shunday, Alloh taoloning qo‘ygan chega…
❤10👍4😢3❤🔥2👌1🔥1
Nahv fani arabcha kalimalarni gap tarkibiga kirgan paytda o‘zgarish bo‘lishi (mo‘rob) va o‘zgarish bo'lmasligi (mabniy)lik jihatlarini o‘rganadi. Arabcha kalimalar esa ma‘nosi e‘tiboridan 3turga boʻlinadi. Bular: 1) Ism; 2) Fe’l; 3) Harf. Bular ichidan harfning barchasi mabniy hisoblanadi. Nahv fanida esa harflarni ikki jihati oʻrganiladi. Bular: 1) Qanday harakatga mabniy ekani; 2) Qanday ma’nolarga qo’yilgani. Mis…
👍7❤5👏5🔥5❤🔥1
#ilm_fazli Imom Abdulloh ibn Muborak (rohimahulloh) aytadilar: Payg‘ambarlik maqomidan keyin ilm tarqatishdan afzalroq maqomni bilmayman. @Muhammadali_Muhiddin
💯7❤🔥6❤5🔥3👍2🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @MuhammadAli_Muhiddin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@MuhammadAli_Muhiddin named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MuhammadAli Muhiddin” (@MuhammadAli_Muhiddin), 568 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MuhammadAli_Muhiddin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.