4 measurements spanning 17 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 193–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 01:27
194
-2
16 Aug 2026, 21:52
196
-2
9 Aug 2026, 01:31
198
no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:50
198
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
79 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
30
38.0%
🔥
28
35.4%
💯
12
15.2%
🥰
6
7.59%
custom 5267224209641190744
3
3.80%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 79 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
КАКИЕ ОНИ?
….ваши ожидания?🧐
В кадре: https://t.me/ulyappilkina
Вы записались к фотографу.
И понимаете, что через пару дней вам предстоит смотреть в объектив!🎬
___________________
Так ЧТО вы на самом деле ЖДЁТЕ от своей фотографии, в частности от своего портрета?
📍ДЕЛИТЕСЬ вашими ожиданиями!
Выберите свой вариант или дополните в комментариях:
1️⃣ Просто красивую картинку — чтобы можно было поставить на ават…
ВОПРОС НА КОТОРЫЙ НЕТ ОТВЕТА!
• Цветная фотография, как реальность или ЧБ, как настроение?
________________
✔️ Для меня ЧБ — это как снять с фотографии лишнее.
Раздеть её. Убрать шум.
Чтобы осталась только суть.
Свет, тень, эмоции.
Когда нет цвета, мы перестаем оценивать «красивость» картинки и начинаем видеть чуть глубже.
✔️ Когда же я смотрю на цветной кадр, мой взгляд бежит за оттенками)
Это прекрасно, но иног…
ПРЕЗЕНТ, КОТОРЫЙ ЖДУТ!
Напоминаю: у меня есть подарочные сертификаты на фотосессию! 📸
Два формата:
🌸 Физический — в красивом конверте, для личного вручения!
🌸 Виртуальный — PDF файл для мгновенной отправки!
ВЫБЕРИТЕ наполнение САМИ:
— количество часов съёмки
— фиксированный номинал в рублях
❣️Срок действия — 6 месяцев❣️
____________________________
ПОЧЕМУ сертификат на фотосессию ценный подарок?
Америки не открою…
ЗА КАДРОМ БОЛЬШОГО СОБЫТИЯ📹
В этот раз моя камера работала в праздничной атмосфере — на выпускном школы моделей «Шёлк» @club122911117 (Шёлк | Модельная студия Алёны Стрельниковой) Это проект для женщин, уже моделей), и он разрушил все стереотипы о том, как должна выглядеть «идеальная картинка».
На площадке шоу-рума @club217817352 (ШОУРУМ ТАТЬЯНЫ АНУФРИЕВОЙ СПБ | ОДЕЖДА ОБУВЬ) блистали разные возрасты, разные типы…
ЛЕТО НА ПАУЗЕ … ИЛИ ЧТО Я БЕРУ С СОБОЙ В ОТПУСК!
Через три недели я уеду в отпуск на месяц.
Я не выключаю телефон и не прячу камеру!
Напротив!
Там, за городом, далеко в 🏔️Саянах🏔️ меня ждет совсем иной контент. Природный, без постановок, все как есть, тихо, сочно, контрастно. Это будет легкий и душевный визуальный дневник❤️
Я расскажу как дышит лето в глубинке!
Оставайтесь со мной и вы все увидите своими глазами!😉
_…
❤7🔥6🥰6
Signed Алла┃Фотограф СПб
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @DAFOTO_DrozdovaAlla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@DAFOTO_DrozdovaAlla named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@club122911117 named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@club217817352 named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association — we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ДА_ФОТО!” (@DAFOTO_DrozdovaAlla), 194 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DAFOTO_DrozdovaAlla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
