Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto🔝Karatist

Channel

Crypto🔝Karatist

@crypto_karatist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,027subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002481469303
TypeChannel
Username@crypto_karatist
Description🥋Озадовський Олексій 📊криптоінвестор 🎙журналіст, ведучий подкастів про крипту, бізнес, blockchain, технології 🎬YouTube 25т+ підписників співпраця @AlexKaratist ADMIN @CryptoKaratist
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 September 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/crypto_karatist

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 20:221,027first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.7%
avg views ÷ 1,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
510
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026
Posts held20 (21 September 2026 – 28 September 2026)
Views total10,200
Reactions total684
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,650
Videos
≈181
Links
≈838

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27m 12s
Average length
9m 04s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

684 reactions across 20 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤20830.4%
🔥14721.5%
👌659.50%
👍598.63%
💯497.16%
🤔324.68%
🥰253.65%
😎223.22%
😁213.07%
👏192.78%
🤩111.61%
🤝60.877%
🎉50.731%
🍓40.585%
🏆30.439%
⚡20.292%
🐳20.292%
🤣20.292%
❤‍🔥10.146%
🌚10.146%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 684 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @crypto_karatist. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 September 2026 to 28 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Sept 2026, 10:53 UTC482 views52 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😎22😁16👏8👍5❤1

28 Sept 2026, 10:49 UTC440 views28 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Шорт📉 чи ЛОНГ⬆️ ? Розібрали ринок з Артемом Дишелем у рубриці «кава з трейдером»

❤15👌12😁1

28 Sept 2026, 07:07 UTC501 views34 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Jumper сейл на Legion Обов’язково пробуємо взяти участь. Моє «обов’язково» — це не гарантія, що сейл точно буде успішним. Це сигнал діяти більшості з вас. Зараз ринок дуже непоганий, і зазвичай двіжуха по сейлах на таких ринках дає результат у вигляді профіту. Тим паче, якщо ви вже в крипті і розумієте, що в цій ніші треба ризикувати — зараз саме час.⚠️ Сейл токенів проходить на платформі Legion. Особисто я вже бра…

👍19❤11🤝4

27 Sept 2026, 17:44 UTC366 views29 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Друзі, зареєструйтеся в Trustee У Trustee є 2 продукти: гаманець і карта. Гаманець реєструється (реєстрація) взагалі за 3 хвилини (за 5 — з верифікацією) і постійно у вас у телефоні. Є основні мережі. З картою все трохи складніше. Карта класна, я нею користуюсь. Але наразі через ліцензію MiCA українці не можуть офіційно зареєструватися. Це можна обійти реєстрацією на європейські документи, але не в кожного вони є.…

👍19💯5❤4🌚1

27 Sept 2026, 10:14 UTC489 views39 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤27🔥9💯3

27 Sept 2026, 09:27 UTC559 views23 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏11🤔7🤩5

27 Sept 2026, 08:13 UTC499 views29 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

І так, поправте мене якщо я помиляюся. Велика кількість учасників… але мені здається, що найближчим був Самурай @Dmytrovich2005

👌18❤6🎉5

26 Sept 2026, 08:34 UTC719 views109 reactionsread 28 September 2026

🎁 РОЗІГРАШ 10 USDT 💸 💰 Вгадай ціну #Bitcoin яка буде завтра 27.09.2026 в 11:00📈по coinmarketcap.com Буде цікаво спостерігати за вашими прогнозами. І головне питання: «Чи обіграєте ви Crypto Karatist?» 😈 👉 Робіть прогноз ціни #BTC сьогодні(26.09.2026) протягом доби. -прогноз(коментар) залишайте під цим постом ❗️⏰Останній прогноз приймається сьогодні о 23:59(прогноз після 23:59 зарахований не буде) 🗓 Завтра (27.0…

❤66🔥33👌6🍓4

26 Sept 2026, 07:42 UTC620 views41 reactionsread 28 September 2026

Розіграш ? Обов’язково! 🛍 💲 💸 💰 ❤️

🥰25❤10🤩6

25 Sept 2026, 13:01 UTC564 views35 reactionsread 28 September 2026
Photo

Абсолютно всі сьогоднішні ваші кумири колись були ніким — звичайними, невідомими людьми. Всі вони починали з мрії, як і мільйони-мільярди інших людей! Але завдяки власним зусиллям, дисципліні, наполегливості та незламності вони стали тими, на кого рівняються мільйони. В тому числі й ви! Відомий актор вперше знявся у фільмі (але до цього мив посуд та підлогу десь під Голлівудом). Відомий письменник колись вперше на…

💯23❤8🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crypto_karatist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto🔝Karatist” (@crypto_karatist), 1,027 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_karatist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.