Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto Todey| کریپتو | دوج | شیبا

Channel

Crypto Todey| کریپتو | دوج | شیبا

@CryptoTodey

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,286subscribers

-4,018 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001716699339
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoTodey
Description🔸گروه @Crypto_Todey 🔸تحلیل و اخبار حوزه رمزارزها 🔸پشتیبانی : @Shayan114 🔸ربات تحلیلگر : @TahlilTodeyBot
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoTodey

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@future_arkacoin/101297 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC@CryptoTodey/57534 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC1.0029 minutes
@future_arkacoin/1016112 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC@CryptoTodey/57749 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC1.0013 hours
@future_arkacoin/1017214 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC@CryptoTodey/57804 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC1.008.0 hours
@future_arkacoin/1018418 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC@CryptoTodey/57920 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC1.0034 minutes
@future_arkacoin/101379 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC@CryptoTodey/57620 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC0.989.7 hours
@future_arkacoin/1016513 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC@CryptoTodey/57764 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC0.9755 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@future_arkacoin33 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9734 minutes@future_arkacoin (33–0)
@alirezamehrabi_com32 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.932.2 hours@alirezamehrabi_com (32–0)
@irmemecoin24 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9442 minutes@irmemecoin (24–0)
@moneyxco22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.988.2 hoursthis entry (21–1)
@YKCRYPTOchanle13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.951.7 hours@YKCRYPTOchanle (8–5)
@arz_jo12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9688 minutes@arz_jo (12–0)
@Bitpin_Academy11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.984.4 hours@Bitpin_Academy (11–0)
@newscryptocurency6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9562 minuteseven
@memecoink76 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9636 minutes@memecoink7 (4–2)
@fire_crypto20226 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.952.3 hoursthis entry (5–1)
@CryptouPlus5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9555 minutesthis entry (4–1)
@crypto_cooki5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.948.3 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 134 of the 134 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 805 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,28620,30418,2957 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 97 days, net -4,018. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,683–20,907 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 09:1916,286-42
10 Nov 2026, 07:5516,328-51
8 Nov 2026, 19:5616,379-14
7 Nov 2026, 15:5716,393-63
6 Nov 2026, 18:4016,456-99
5 Nov 2026, 19:4016,555-58
4 Nov 2026, 22:4516,613-444
3 Nov 2026, 20:4717,057-294
2 Nov 2026, 19:5817,351-22
1 Nov 2026, 21:5617,373-36
31 Oct 2026, 22:2817,409-18
30 Oct 2026, 23:1017,427-25
30 Oct 2026, 01:3717,452-29
29 Oct 2026, 02:2917,481-39
27 Oct 2026, 21:5817,520-53
26 Oct 2026, 20:4517,573-10
25 Oct 2026, 19:0917,583-43
24 Oct 2026, 17:0517,626-13
23 Oct 2026, 18:0617,639-69
22 Oct 2026, 19:3817,708first reading

Engagement

1,001 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.37%
avg views ÷ 16,286 subscribers
Avg views / post
549
250 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.968%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
250
of 1,001 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 237 of 250 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held1,001 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total137,221
Reactions total1,313
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 18:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈51,300
Videos
≈1,530
Links
≈16,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 11m
Average length
3m 15s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,283 reactions across 837 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,94159.1%
🔥70921.6%
👍2969.02%
🤔1283.90%
🙏1093.32%
🤬401.22%
👏150.457%
😁130.396%
🤣130.396%
💯70.213%
👀60.183%
💔20.061%
🎉10.03%
😢10.03%
😱10.03%
🤝10.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 840 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,283 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 250 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC94 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

@Crypto_Todey منبع: ارزدیجیتال

👍3🔥1🤔1

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC92 views7 reactionsread 14 November 2026

فکت: اگر ۵ سال پیش ۱۰‌هزار دلار اتریوم می‌خریدید، امروز ۴۳۶۰ دلار سرمایه داشتید! منبع: ارزدیجیتال

🤣5🤔2

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 15:34 UTC88 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

رویاهای زیادی که طی پنج سال خاکستر شد! منبع: ارزدیجیتال

🔥4🤔2

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC94 views8 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⭕️ ریپل روی لبه تیغ؛ خطر ریزش ۲۰ درصدی تا کجا جدیه؟ ⚠️ قیمت ریپل بعد از افت ۱۵ درصدی دوباره به مرز حساس یک دلار رسیده و هر لغزش جدیدی می‌تونه ضربه سنگینی به خریدارها بزنه. 📊 تحلیل‌های تکنیکال نشون میده که اگه سطح حمایتی ۰.۹۹ دلار از دست بره، قیمت ریپل مستعد سقوط تا محدوده ۰.۸۰ دلار میشه. منبع: ارزدیجیتال

🔥4🤔2🙏2

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⁉️لئو کوگوان، میلیاردر معروف که حدود ۱.۳ میلیارد دلار سهام انویدیا رو داره، گفته دیگه این سهام رو نمیخرم چون مدیرعامل قبلی رفته! اعتماد خیلی از سرمایه‌گذارهای بزرگ Nvidia از دست رفته! 🆔@CryptoTodey منبع: علیرضا محرابی

🔥4🤔2

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC87 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

وینترموت دوباره شورت‌هاش رو بزرگ‌تر کرد❗️ توی پست قبل گفتیم شرکت وینترمیوت با 126 میلیون دلار شورت توی هایپرلیکوئید باز کرده بود و توی سود بود حالا آپدیت جدید👇🏻 وینترموت بعد از سیو سودی که کرده حالا 18 میلیون دلار به شورت‌هاش اضافه کرده و حجم کل شورتش از 72 میلیون دلار به 90 میلیون دلار رسیده بزرگ‌ترین پوزیشن ها: اتریوم: 18M$ سولانا: 15.3M$ هایپرلیکویید: 5M$ در حال حاضر پوزیشن های بازش حدود 2 میلیون دلار توی سودن…

👍3🔥2

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC73 views7 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📊 آلت‌کوین‌ها هنوز از بیت‌کوین عقبن! فقط ۳۱ رمزارز تونستن طی ۹۰ روز گذشته عملکرد بهتری از بیت‌کوین داشته باشن، شاخص آلت‌سیزن هم روی عدد ۳۸ قرار گرفته که نشون می‌ده هنوز بازار بیشتر به نفع بیت‌کوینه تا آلت‌کوین‌ها 🔹 آلت‌هایی که بهترین عملکرد داشتن: ▪️ بیت وی (BTW): رشد ۲۱۹٪ ▪️ کوانت (QNT): رشد ۱۸۴٪ ▪️ نایت (NIGHT): رشد ۱۷۱٪ ▪️ رِی (RAY): رشد ۱۵۱٪ این آمار نشون می‌ده هنوز پول به‌صورت گسترده وارد بازار آلت‌کوین‌ها ن…

👍5🔥2

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

📉 بیت‌کوین هنوز خریدار جدی نداره! تقاضای سرمایه‌گذاران خرد به‌شدت افت کرده و به منفی ۱۰٪ رسیده؛ از طرف دیگه ماینرها هم بیت‌کوین بیشتری به صرافی‌ها منتقل می‌کنن که می‌تونه نشونه افزایش فشار فروش باشه ❗️بخش زیادی از پوزیشن‌های اهرم‌دار از بازار خارج شدن، اما هنوز خریدارهای واقعی با سرمایه نقدی کافی وارد نشدن 🔍 وقتی سرمایه‌گذاران خرد عقب‌نشینی می‌کنن و تقاضای اسپات هم ضعیفه، برگشت قیمت به‌تنهایی نمی‌تونه نشونه شروع ر…

👍3🤔2🔥1

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC73 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

با سقوط قیمت بیت‌کوین، زیان تحقق‌نیافته شرکت استراتژی از ۷ میلیارد دلار گذشت شرکت استراتژی (Strategy)، بزرگ‌ترین دارنده شرکتی بیت‌کوین، با افت قیمت این رمزارز به زیر ۶۷ هزار دلار، شاهد افزایش زیان تحقق‌نیافته ذخایر خود به حدود ۷.۲ میلیارد دلار شد. ارزش این ذخایر در قیمت مبنای گزارش، حدود ۵۶.۹ میلیارد دلار برآورد شده؛ درحالی‌که بهای تمام‌شده خرید آن‌ها ۶۴.۱۶ میلیارد دلار است. 🔘منبع 🔸@CryptoTodey

👍4🔥1

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC72 views5 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

فروش هدایای کلکسیونی تلگرام به ۴۴.۸ میلیون دلار رسید معاملات هدایای کلکسیونی تلگرام در ۳۰ روز منتهی به ۱۳ نوامبر به ۴۰.۸ میلیون TON، معادل حدود ۴۴.۸ میلیون دلار، رسید. این حجم در نزدیک به ۱.۹۱ میلیون معامله ثبت شد و دو بازار MRKT و Portals در مجموع ۷۸.۲ درصد از گردش معاملات را در اختیار داشتند. 🔘منبع 🔸@CryptoTodey

👍3❤1🔥1

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

فروش ۵ هزار ETH در پنج روز؛ آیا ۱۰ هزار اتریوم باقی‌مانده هم فروخته می‌شود؟ یک کیف پول مرتبط با بنیاد اتریوم طی پنج روز ۵ هزار ETH فروخت و ارزش اتریوم هم‌زمان برای نخستین بار در این دوره به زیر ۲ هزار دلار رسید. این فروش‌ها از ۱۰ تا ۱۴ نوامبر انجام شد و ارزش آنها حدود ۹.۹۲ میلیون دلار، با میانگین قیمت ۱٬۹۸۳.۵ دلار برای هر ETH، بود. 🔘منبع 🔸@CryptoTodey

🔥2

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

14 Nov 2026, 12:34 UTC72 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026

📊اتریوم ETH بعد از 12 هفته دوباره به زیر 2 هزار دلار سقوط کرده ⚠️در صورتی تثبیت طی هفته های آینده زیر این ناحیه می‌تونه تا 1680 دلار مجدد ریزش داشته باشه . @CryptoTodey

🔥1

Signed 🔸CryptoTodey🔸

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,001 posts we hold for @CryptoTodey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دهگردی
@dehgardicom · 41,030
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 29 August 2026
Djsonami دیجی سونامی
@djsonami · 156,797
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 28 August 2026
مشاوره کنکور رندو | سروش جباری
@randoteam · 461,431
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto Todey| کریپتو | دوج | شیبا” (@CryptoTodey), 16,286 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoTodey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.