Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 79 days, net -8,278. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Oct 2026, 05:10
2
-1
18 Oct 2026, 09:40
3
-8,733
12 Sept 2026, 19:40
8,736
+124
8 Sept 2026, 18:16
8,612
+38
3 Sept 2026, 06:46
8,574
+42
30 Aug 2026, 21:28
8,532
+90
27 Aug 2026, 16:44
8,442
+59
24 Aug 2026, 14:47
8,383
+21
20 Aug 2026, 20:55
8,362
+18
17 Aug 2026, 19:45
8,344
+23
14 Aug 2026, 14:54
8,321
+27
11 Aug 2026, 10:29
8,294
+14
8 Aug 2026, 02:26
8,280
no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:34
8,280
first reading
Engagement
54 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 54 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2,571 reactions across 54 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5866369239740320716
549
21.4%
custom 5832384984593206481
471
18.3%
custom 5900226303725933346
315
12.3%
custom 5460855452902367257
294
11.4%
custom 5237921335702724931
275
10.7%
custom 5886662779825294115
183
7.12%
custom 5861559868506247215
168
6.53%
custom 5877561499311934833
131
5.10%
custom 5208878706717636743
105
4.08%
custom 5832636231590087941
80
3.11%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 54 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,571 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
662
across the posts below
Posts paid on
54
of 54 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
164
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CryptoBetBoys. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 54 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
7.41%
4 of 54 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,190
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,290
over 50 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 54 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Ну что WELCOM
шорт биткоин 📉 берем
❤️Образовалось дивергенция на индекаторах
Сомнительная ситуация , могут дать сквиз на 83 ка максимум . Но вижу тут шорт все равно
торгуй со мной
лично — @BetPawson 😻
Лучшая биржа для торговли 🪙
Прочитал этих двух
сучек )) 👋
Забираем свое и можно ехать отдохнуть в ресторанчик
☕️ часть забрал и часть держу дальше мб до 200%
–: Как и сказал и она и биток пойдет вверх
Монетка IOTA выросла уже на 50% с перфоманса бтх 🚬
Даже сейчас на ней неплохой обьем
+ от своей поддержки мы отскочили
Беру в ЛОНГ , только когда увидишь прибыль не жадничай! И фиксируй сразу
Жми и торгуй со мной 🪙
🔥 Bitunix уже в ТОП-6 криптобирж по объёму торгов!
у меня вопрос почему ты
еще не там?
🟢Лучшие условия
🟢Лучший и понятный интерфейс
🟢Ниже всех комиссия
🟢Большие бонусы
Зачем я это перечисляю :) просто чтобы ты изменил выбор в сторону БИРЖИ , которая даст тебе заработать
Так что кто хочет стать моим рефом и регулярно получать вкусные бонусы за торговлю, обращайтесь в лс @BetPawson
➡️ https://www.bitunix.com/regi…
💸 Рекомендую подписаться, чел занимается алго трейдингом
делает софты для торговли с винрейтом 95%
Гений, плейбой, миллиардер, филантроп
Жми: https://t.me/ludos404
#реклама
Папа заходит на рынок 😎
Лонг по AAVE
❤️Есть хороший обьем , сейчас вижу поддержку от которой мы уверено ушли выше , сейчас снова пришли туда же , плюс упорство битка пойти выше , не даст ей упасть
Думаю все прекрасно 👍
Торгуй со мной Bitunix 🪙
Showing the 12 most recent of 54 posts we hold for @CryptoBetBoys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @CryptoBetBoys as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
19 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
24 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бизнес в деле @business_vdele · 20,396 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 September 2026
Двигатель миллионеров | Бизнес @millionairesengine · 61,192 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 22 August 2026
Мышление Миллионера @millionaire_thinks · 94,031 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 16 August 2026
Business people | Мотивация @motivator_inc · 62,301 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🍎 Переходник 🍏” (@CryptoBetBoys), 2 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoBetBoys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
