Кому обещал ключи за тесты пишите в лс

Channel
404
@ludos404
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,722subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002368791065 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ludos404 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ludos404 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 2,722 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 2,721 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 2,724 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 50.6%
- avg views ÷ 2,722 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,380
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.716%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 26,172 |
| Reactions total | 169 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
169 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 50.3% | |
| 😁 | 78 | 46.2% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.78% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.592% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 7
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ludos404. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Этот день настал. Сегодня запуск скринера Print 404 Я вложил силы, время и главное душу в этот инструмент и сделал его реально крутым. Вы можете сделать свой алертник или приватку, доступ к апи в тарифе creator, лучшие скорости, приятный визуал Кроме того чат, френд система, тех поддержка и только полезные инструменты Я буду развивать этот проект и в скором времени добавлю бирж, функций, еще разных прикольных шту…
😁5❤4
07.08 газ
❤6😁2🦄1
Сегодня и завтра последние дни фри теста, кто хотел посмотреть скринер - последний шанс После этого мне нужно будет еще 2-3 дня чтобы сделать релиз версию и добавить все что написали, спасибо каждому за фидбек В топ тарифе за 99$ кроме того что вы можете сделать свою приватку за 10 минут будет также апи. Вы сможете максимально быстро получать все ответы от всех бирж без ограничений и делать что захотите.
❤5😁5
Парни кто тестил тг алерты дайте фидбека плс @Ludoman404
Если вы ввели пароль в бота и забыли его /password и снова пароль новым сообщением
❤7
Надеюсь нет проблем со входом и ниче не лежит а то я тг бота забыл обновить он уебищный но вроде работает
❤3🤯2😁2
@Print404_bot https://print404.pro/ Регаетесь в боте, заходите на сайт, нажимаете купить подписку и выбираете тестовый тариф Буду очень рад фидбеку, что можно улучшить или баги
❤5🔥2😁2
Возможно для новичков будет сложный интерфейс но потыкайте хотя бы 15 минут, все кнопки кликабельны, все настройки индивидуальны под каждый веб парсер и тг парсер, алерты, графики в реальном времени, все данные со всех бирж(пока всего 9 дальше будет больше) Сделал специально так чтобы лишняя инфа не мешала глазам. Алерты в тг и возможность создать свои приватки получилось круто. 5 дней теста, за это время добавлю пр…
😁4
чето у меня у самого писюн встает на то, что я придумал главное теперь правильно это реализовать😁
😁9❤2
Если сегодня успею сделать то, что хочу - запущу скринер с бесплатным тарифом для всех на 5 дней, за это время потестите все функции, надеюсь будут предложения для улучшения и после тестового периода релиз
😁15❤4
А что если дать вам возможность создавать свои приватки для друзей или на продажу используя мой бекенд? Создали бота, создали тг чат с ветками, 10 минут настроили и у вас есть личный топовый парсер который можете калибровать как только хотите
😁14❤5🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ludos404. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вайбкодеры, какая модель по-вашему опыту пизже всех?
- фейбл 538%
- опус 524%
- гпт 5.6 сол38%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 60,183 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@binance_2p_1m · 20120 postsBinance P/D 30% 3h
@binance_30p_3h · 22220 postsBinance P/D 50% 24h
@binance_50p_24h · 24520 postsBinance P/D 5% 10m
@binance_5p_10m · 20920 postsByBit P/D 10% 30m
@bybit_10p_30m · 22820 postsByBit P/D 30% 3h
@bybit_30p_3h · 24320 postsByBit P/D 50% 24h
@bybit_50p_24h · 24520 postsByBit P/D 5% 10m
@bybit_5p_10m · 20620 postsGate P/D 10% 5m
@gate_10p_5m · 22420 postsGate P/D 30% 90m
@gate_30p_90m · 25720 postsMexc P/D 10% 5m
@mexc_10p_5m · 25420 postsMexc P/D 30% 90m
@mexc_30p_90m · 31820 postsctrl.α
@ctrl_alpha · 5551 postfree arty private by RND
@freeartybyrnd · 3791 postMirrors 888
@jst_rmbr8888 · 1,3001 postMiron vinosit 6figs
@Mironvinosit · 2,1371 postMIRRORS by RND
@mirrorsbyrnd · 1,4931 postUZZI
@uzzi_crypto · 181 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“404” (@ludos404), 2,722 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ludos404.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.