Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗖π—₯π—œπ—–π—ž π—œπ—§

Channel

𝗖π—₯π—œπ—–π—ž π—œπ—§

@Cricket_it

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

424subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002013452381
TypeChannel
Username@Cricket_it
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 September 2026
Last confirmed live20 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cricket_it

Topic

Sports β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4244444343 September 2026 β€” 444 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 444 subscribers12 September 2026 β€” 439 subscribers25 September 2026 β€” 435 subscribers6 October 2026 β€” 430 subscribers14 October 2026 β€” 427 subscribers20 October 2026 β€” 424 subscribers3 September 202620 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 47 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 421–447 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Oct 2026, 12:40424-3
14 Oct 2026, 06:35427-3
6 Oct 2026, 18:21430-5
25 Sept 2026, 00:38435-4
12 Sept 2026, 03:16439-5
3 Sept 2026, 21:22444no change
3 Sept 2026, 20:47444first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘1943.2%
πŸ”₯1738.6%
❀818.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 44 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Apr 2026, 14:53 UTC361 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Fastest to 500 IPL Boundaries β—Ž 87 inns: Chris Gayle β—Ž 101 inns: Jos Buttler β—Ž 105 inns: David Warner β—Ž 105 inns: KL Rahul β—‰ 117 inns: Shubman Gill β—Ž 120 inns: Faf du Plessis

πŸ”₯1

3 Apr 2026, 13:40 UTC361 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Guy's please do join our meme channel! βœ… https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz JOINNNN NOWWWW! 🚨🚨

πŸ”₯1

1 Apr 2026, 13:33 UTC283 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Nissanka making his IPL debut Miller & Ngidi making their DC debuts

πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

1 Apr 2026, 06:04 UTC263 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Guy's please do join our meme channel! βœ… https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz JOINNNN NOWWWW! 🚨🚨

πŸ”₯1

31 Mar 2026, 17:56 UTC129 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

β€’ Fifty in his first game! β€’ Stays unbeaten in a tricky chase! β€’ Hits the winning runs for Punjab! Connolly, welcome to the IPL

❀1πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

31 Mar 2026, 16:45 UTC93 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Most Top Scores for the team in IPL this decade! (innings) β—‰ 32: Shubman Gill (92) β—Ž 27: Virat Kohli (91) β—Ž 25: KL Rahul (78) β—Ž 23: Faf du Plessis (83) β—Ž 22: Ruturaj Gaikwad (71) β—Ž 21: Shikhar Dhawan (63) β—Ž 21: Jos Buttler (75) β—Ž 21: Suryakumar (81)

πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

31 Mar 2026, 14:20 UTC80 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Sai Sudharsan fails Marco Jansen gets the breakthrough Buttler time

πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

31 Mar 2026, 13:32 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Toss Update! 🚨 PBKS won the toss and opted to bowl first..

πŸ”₯2πŸ‘1

31 Mar 2026, 09:40 UTC76 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Guy's please do join our meme channel! βœ… https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz JOINNNN NOWWWW! 🚨🚨

πŸ”₯1

31 Mar 2026, 09:23 UTC54 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

No batter had more sixes than Vaibhav after 8 IPL innings. β—‰ 29: Vaibhav Suryavanshi β—Ž 28: Jake Fraser-McGurk β—Ž 21: Glenn Maxwell β—Ž 20: Kyle Mayers β—Ž 20: Nitish Kumar Reddy

πŸ”₯2πŸ‘1

31 Mar 2026, 05:04 UTC42 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Most Losses after 20 games as IPL Captain! (Indians) β—‰ 12: Ruturaj Gaikwad β—Ž 12: Ajinkya Rahane β—Ž 12: KL Rahul β—Ž 12: Rahul Dravid β—Ž 12: Shikhar Dhawan β—Ž 12: Zaheer Khan

πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

30 Mar 2026, 17:03 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

T20 Sixes at Age 15! β—‰ 67: Vaibhav Suryavanshi β—Ž 24: All others combined

πŸ‘2πŸ”₯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cricket_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Cricket Raash️
@cricket_raash Β· 23,500
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 48 here β€” alongside 47 others β€” read 16 September 2026
Success Tree
@successtree Β· 44,815
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 64 here β€” alongside 63 others β€” read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ—–π—₯π—œπ—–π—ž π—œπ—§β€ (@Cricket_it), 424 subscribers as measured 20 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cricket_it.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.