Channel
@Cricket_capture
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
1,032subscribers
+36 since we began measuring on 25 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001937644900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cricket_capture |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 25 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cricket_capture |
Sports β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:56 | 1,032 | +3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:30 | 1,029 | -1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 1,030 | -3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 1,033 | -14 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 03:02 | 1,047 | -15 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 1,062 | +93 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 969 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 972 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 983 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 996 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 996 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
127 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 75 | 59.1% | |
| π₯ | 40 | 31.5% | |
| β€ | 9 | 7.09% | |
| π | 3 | 2.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 127 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 8 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Fastest to 500 IPL Boundaries β 87 inns: Chris Gayle β 101 inns: Jos Buttler β 105 inns: David Warner β 105 inns: KL Rahul β 117 inns: Shubman Gill β 120 inns: Faf du Plessis
β€9π₯5π4
Nissanka making his IPL debut Miller & Ngidi making their DC debuts
π₯4π3
Guy's please do join our meme channel! β https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz JOINNNN NOWWWW! π¨π¨
π₯1
Scene tonight @cricket_memz
π3
β’ Fifty in his first game! β’ Stays unbeaten in a tricky chase! β’ Hits the winning runs for Punjab! Connolly, welcome to the IPL
π6π₯2
Most Top Scores for the team in IPL this decade! (innings) β 32: Shubman Gill (92) β 27: Virat Kohli (91) β 25: KL Rahul (78) β 23: Faf du Plessis (83) β 22: Ruturaj Gaikwad (71) β 21: Shikhar Dhawan (63) β 21: Jos Buttler (75) β 21: Suryakumar (81)
π5π₯2
Sai Sudharsan fails Marco Jansen gets the breakthrough Buttler time
π3π₯3
Toss Update! π¨ PBKS won the toss and opted to bowl first..
π4π₯2
Guy's please do join our meme channel! β https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz https://t.me/cricket_memz JOINNNN NOWWWW! π¨π¨
π₯1
No batter had more sixes than Vaibhav after 8 IPL innings. β 29: Vaibhav Suryavanshi β 28: Jake Fraser-McGurk β 21: Glenn Maxwell β 20: Kyle Mayers β 20: Nitish Kumar Reddy
π2π₯2
Most Losses after 20 games as IPL Captain! (Indians) β 12: Ruturaj Gaikwad β 12: Ajinkya Rahane β 12: KL Rahul β 12: Rahul Dravid β 12: Shikhar Dhawan β 12: Zaheer Khan
π4π₯1
T20 Sixes at Age 15! β 67: Vaibhav Suryavanshi β 24: All others combined
π5π₯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Cricket_capture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ₯πππππ§ πππ£π§π¨π₯πβ (@Cricket_capture), 1,032 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cricket_capture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.