Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for War Thunder | ЧСВ

Channel

War Thunder | ЧСВ

@telega4itera

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,461subscribers

+95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001706204855
TypeChannel
Username@telega4itera
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/telega4itera

Growth

12,36612,46112,413.57 August 2026 — 12,366 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,371 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,380 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,382 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,381 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,378 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,383 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,393 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,405 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,402 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,404 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,405 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,404 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,406 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,397 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,424 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,435 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,461 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
18 measurements spanning 20 days, net +95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,352–12,475 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 10:2312,461+26
26 Aug 2026, 08:2612,435+11
25 Aug 2026, 09:1212,424+27
24 Aug 2026, 10:1112,397-9
22 Aug 2026, 16:3212,406+2
20 Aug 2026, 10:2812,404-1
19 Aug 2026, 11:0712,405+1
18 Aug 2026, 11:3312,404+2
17 Aug 2026, 14:5612,402-3
16 Aug 2026, 06:2312,405+12
14 Aug 2026, 15:1812,393+10
13 Aug 2026, 05:5712,383+5
12 Aug 2026, 04:0212,378-3
11 Aug 2026, 06:2112,381-1
10 Aug 2026, 05:2812,382+2
9 Aug 2026, 07:1212,380+9
8 Aug 2026, 09:3412,371+5
7 Aug 2026, 14:1912,366first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.0%
avg views ÷ 12,461 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,240
79 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held80 (31 July 202626 August 2026)
Views total413,740
Reactions total8,367
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 04:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,367 reactions across 79 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,33727.9%
😁1,61519.3%
👍90210.8%
🤡5796.92%
😭5336.37%
🤣5076.06%
🥰4835.77%
👏2362.82%
2012.40%
❤‍🔥1742.08%
🔥1481.77%
🤔1141.36%
🙏1121.34%
🫡1041.24%
💯590.705%
🤩450.538%
😨360.43%
😱350.418%
🌭220.263%
🥱200.239%
22 further kinds1051.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 79 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @telega4itera. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC≈2,610 views146 reactions4 Starsread 27 August 2026
Photo

КЕЙСЫ ЗАВТРА! Как я и говорил - четверг

👍113🥰118😱7😴4🤡3

26 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈3,090 views31 reactions1 Starread 27 August 2026

Все привет! Вот вам совет по прокачке хорни, а то забыл в видео сказать. А еще стартует стрим, залетайте https://youtube.com/shorts/9k7LBmWgr_U ТВИТЧ СМОТРЕТЬ СТРИМ АГА https://www.twitch.tv/4cb_yt

24🌚3🤡2❤‍🔥1👍1

25 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈3,630 views38 reactionsread 27 August 2026

КОМАНДНАЯ ИГРА КСТАТИ! НЕ ЗАБЫВАЕМ ПРО ЭТО https://youtube.com/shorts/xaZukT8Qp64

27🤡6😈3👌1💯1

25 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈3,720 views64 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

ЖДЁМ КЕЙСЫ В ПРЯМОМ ЭФИРЕ ЗДЕСЬ https://www.twitch.tv/4cb_yt

🤣488🤡6❤‍🔥1😈1

25 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈3,870 views94 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

А это симуляторные бои - там бога нет... Вот что бывает, если убрать вилку бра и выпустить штурмовичков в начале боя против танкистов. Единственный режим где совки реально догнали праймовых амеров из трб по винке и силе.

❤‍🔥68😱17🤔52🤡1😈1

25 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈3,830 views94 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Вот так на данный момент выглядит винрейт за июль. Топы СССР вернулись на свое место(причина ввод новых обем и ажиотажа среди хороших игроков их прокачать+нерф фугасного воздействия лемура). США на топах цветет и пахнет - но это пока хайп не спадет. Так же видна причина вывода хорни, хотя там добавила турбулентности еще и л39. Красным крутят чы не? Специально обученные люди прояснят за это в комментариях.

75😁10👍6❤‍🔥1🤡1😈1

24 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈3,910 views63 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Соскучились? Заходите на стрим! https://www.twitch.tv/4cb_yt

56🤡5👎1😈1

24 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈4,000 views46 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Новое видео дорогие подписчики для вас принес, да это не кейсы но лучше чем ничего да? https://youtu.be/3u2sv_TOGN8?si=26cK2ONLXb7A_3bf

36🔥5👍3🤡1😈1

24 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC≈4,040 views198 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Истерия по кейсам нашего СНГ-аниме-танкового комьюнити продолжается🤡. Слыш БВВД где кейсы!? 🫵🏿

😭145😁34🤡142👍2🔥1

24 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈4,090 views176 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

А худшую карту игры превратят в очередные поля Донбасса(что не сделает её хорошей)

145🤡22👍5😭3🤣1

24 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC≈3,990 views131 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Шото плохие предчувствия по поводу новой карты, а у вас?

94💯27🤡6🌚3😡1

23 Aug 2026, 19:22 UTC≈4,380 views236 reactions3 Starsread 27 August 2026
Video

РПУ желает вам спокойной ночи и ждет вас завтра в игре вар тандер!

168😁45🤣7❤‍🔥5🤬5🥰4🤡2

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @telega4itera. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTCAnonymous Poll1,270 voters approx.

СМОТРИМ КОЛОБКА НА ТВИТЧЕ?🌚

  1. ДА30%
  2. НЕ33%
  3. ЧЕЛОВЕК ПАУК УМРЕТ на 2:05:0755%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

War Thunder | RU
@warthunderru · 84,092
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
KorbenDallas
@korbenlive · 68,688
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“War Thunder | ЧСВ” (@telega4itera), 12,461 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/telega4itera.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.