8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,715–6,872 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Aug 2026, 14:27
6,775
-79
24 Aug 2026, 00:07
6,854
+79
20 Aug 2026, 06:47
6,775
+38
16 Aug 2026, 20:19
6,737
+4
13 Aug 2026, 12:16
6,733
-3
10 Aug 2026, 10:42
6,736
+1
7 Aug 2026, 17:35
6,735
-3
7 Aug 2026, 02:00
6,738
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 6,775 subscribers
Avg views / post
877
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
18 (6 April 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
5,263
Reactions total
86
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 05:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 14s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
264 reactions across 17 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
20.5%
🤬
33
12.5%
👍
26
9.85%
🤡
21
7.95%
🤩
20
7.58%
😨
14
5.30%
🥴
14
5.30%
💯
12
4.55%
🌚
9
3.41%
👏
8
3.03%
🤨
7
2.65%
🤷♀
7
2.65%
😢
5
1.89%
🤪
5
1.89%
🔥
4
1.52%
👀
3
1.14%
✍
2
0.758%
🎉
2
0.758%
🗿
2
0.758%
😴
2
0.758%
11 further kinds
14
5.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 264reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @trickymarketing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Louis Vuitton made a €2.5M Porsche. 🚗💰
Leather, wood, custom luggage, a helmet, surfboard — even titanium skis. 🏄♂️🎿
Because apparently owning a normal Porsche is just too embarrassing now. 🙄
Only one of each exists. ✨
At this point, it’s less “car” and more a luxury starter pack for people who ran out of things to buy 😭
Would you drive it — or is this just rich people cosplay? 🎭
@trickymarketing
Barbie now has type 1 diabetes — complete with a glucose monitor, insulin pump and a cute medical bag.
Honestly? This is sweet. Kids deserve dolls that look like their real lives.
But which Barbie comes next: ADHD Barbie with 37 unfinished hobbies, or Burnout Barbie who hasn’t replied to a message in six business days? 😭
Which one are you buying?
@trickymarketing❤️
Netflix locked a man inside a billboard in Hollywood. 🎬🏙
They built a real room inside the billboard, gave him food for three days, and even a board so he could communicate with people walking by. 🍕📢
All of this is to promote their new film The Last House, where a family gets trapped inside their own home. 🏠🔒 Honestly, marketers are getting too powerful. 💼📈
At what point does marketing become a psychological exper…
Scientists say Earth needs fewer people 🌍📉
A new study says the world population should slowly fall from 8.3 billion to 4 billion by 2200. 📉
Don’t panic — nobody is proposing Thanos. 🚫🦸♂️ The idea is simply fewer births over time. 👶📉
Good for the planet? Probably. 🌱✨
Good for pensions, hospitals and the job market? Hmm… awkward. 🏥💰🤔
Would 4 billion people make Earth better — or just turn the whole planet into one …
🚨 Fashion Has Officially Lost It
If you like baguettes... good news.
A Paris designer made a baguette holder so you never have to carry your bread like a peasant again. 🥖
It costs around €320.
And if that's still too affordable...
Balenciaga has this jacket that literally looks like human intestines.
Yours for only $27,540.
Imagine explaining that purchase:
"Yeah... I paid twenty-seven grand to look like my digest…
Philips made a fake window for people tired of grey skies ☁️💡
Philips Skylight mimics real sunlight and even changes brightness and tone throughout the day. 🌞
The premium version also includes UV-B light to support vitamin D production. 🧴
Price: around €500. 💸
So basically, when the sun refuses to show up, Philips sells you a replacement. ☀️
Would you buy this for winter — or is €500 too much for artificial sunshine?…
When burnout becomes content 🎥
A Japanese worker filmed his 18-hour day: wake up, 1.5h commute, work till 8 PM, edit videos till 1 AM, repeat. Millions watched. 📈
Marketing twist: exhaustion sold as ambition.
No sleep? Discipline. 😴❌
No free time? Hustle. ⚡️
Nervous breakdown? Personal growth. 🧠
Algorithms thrive: one suffers, millions watch, brands sell productivity apps. 📱💸
Capitalism’s best campaign: burnout = per…
Can changing a logo destroy a company’s relationship with its customers?
Cracker Barrel tried to modernize its old-fashioned American image.
The restaurant redesigned its interiors and removed the traditional “Uncle Herschel” character from its logo. From a design perspective, the new version was cleaner and easier to use online.
But customers did not see a cleaner logo.
They saw a company rejecting its own history.
…
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Native advertising has officially entered books 😭
Now the main character in a romance novel isn’t just crying near the window…
she’s casually buying a $5.99 Hallmark Channel subscription to “relax after a long day.”
And the weirdest part?
It’s not even written like an ad.
It’s blended into the story so naturally like:
“she made tea…
thought about her ex…
and renewed her subscription.”
Honestly this is probably th…
In 2008, Zoo York released live cockroaches with their logo printed on them across NYC.
The campaign was called “Spread the Word.”
Disgusting?
Yes.
Unforgettable marketing?
Also yes 😄
@trickymarketing
🤬12❤3🗿2🙉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @trickymarketing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ask Me @askmenow · 69,698 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Groww Digest @growwdigest · 51,781 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Curiosity Tea ☕️ @Curiosity_Tea · 77,074 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Tricky Marketing” (@trickymarketing), 6,775 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trickymarketing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.