Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for πŸ…²πŸ…ΎπŸ…»πŸ…»πŸ…΄πŸ…²πŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ†…πŸ…΄ πŸ†πŸ…ΈπŸ†‚πŸ…ΈπŸ…½πŸ…Ά Kathara Bio-regenisisπŸ”₯πŸ’₯✨

Channel

πŸ…²πŸ…ΎπŸ…»πŸ…»πŸ…΄πŸ…²πŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ†…πŸ…΄ πŸ†πŸ…ΈπŸ†‚πŸ…ΈπŸ…½πŸ…Ά Kathara Bio-regenisisπŸ”₯πŸ’₯✨

@CollectiveRising

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry

791subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001534852038
TypeChannel
Username@CollectiveRising
Created23 June 2021 β€” measured β€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CollectiveRising

Growth

7917957937 August 2026 β€” 793 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 793 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 795 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 791 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 790–796 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 07:36791-4
15 Aug 2026, 10:05795+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:45793no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:48793first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
25.2%
avg views Γ· 791 subscribers
Avg views / post
199
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.62%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (26 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total996
Reactions total46
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

206 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀10048.5%
πŸ”₯2713.1%
πŸ‘2411.7%
πŸ’―2311.2%
πŸ₯°73.40%
πŸ‘62.91%
😒41.94%
❀‍πŸ”₯31.46%
🀨31.46%
πŸ™20.971%
πŸ¦„20.971%
πŸ’”10.485%
πŸ•Š10.485%
😨10.485%
😭10.485%
πŸ™ˆ10.485%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC88 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

8:8:8 𝗩𝗒π—₯π—§π—˜π—« See the π™£π™šπ™¬ π™–π™œπ™š 𝙩𝙧𝙖π™₯ for what it is, a soft pull (artificial light vortex) that feels soothing & promising π’·π“Šπ“‰ drifts you out of your own centre and into someone else’s narrative... What is true alignment? Its Your Monadic Alignment to the true Cosmic Clock & Aligning your 144 letter codes β€’ The Gregorian calendar is not a cosmic calendar. It does not follow the tilt, the wobble or the slow turning of Ea…

❀8πŸ‘1πŸ‘1

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

6 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC142 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Angels and Possession https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YQ7DfEW0scM

❀8😭1

Signed Matt Nicolaci (Collective Rising)

29 Jul 2026, 08:00 UTC234 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Notice: Changed time for upcoming Premiere πŸ‘†πŸΌ Premieres ⏱️ 30 July 2026 @ 8PM AEST

❀6πŸ‘2

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

29 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC231 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/iwCm6eGMQgE?is=UQ8wUx_RveglLNzu

❀7πŸ‘2

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

24 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC301 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

˚q﹑⟑ Knowledge, KNOWING and the Imprint for Health ⟑﹑q˚ Follow us @ www.youtube.com/@CollectiveRising #freedomteachings #ashayanadeane #keylonticscience #collectiverising

❀5πŸ”₯4πŸ‘1

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

17 Jul 2026, 05:29 UTC398 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://youtu.be/-rObLIpjofk?is=sqHj5kM4ujkfWF-l I second Nicki's thoughts on this. We don't need a "substance" to connect us with our higher self. Plz be careful out there, the answers are always within πŸ™

❀9πŸ‘3πŸ’―2

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

12 Jul 2026, 20:46 UTC403 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

πŸ”₯FIELD HYGIENE RITUAL πŸ”₯FREEDOM TEACHINGS EXPLAINED πŸ”₯HEALING VIDEOS CAN BE Accessed here. Instant streaming. πŸ‘‡ https://www.collectiverising.earth/videos

❀2πŸ‘1

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

10 Jul 2026, 22:41 UTC365 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Our online community can be accessed here New posts 2-3 times a week. Lot of engagement, q&a. Meet others. Great space. Sign up to indigo connect through our website first to access the app πŸ™

❀4πŸ”₯2

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

10 Jul 2026, 22:37 UTC299 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

If you signed up to INDIGO CONNECT through our website, you can then be a part of our online community. Download user friendly SPACES App and access using the code above πŸ’₯

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

9 Jul 2026, 07:40 UTC288 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

LEARN FREEDOM TEACHINGS: BEGINNERS DISCOURSES ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ πŸ‘‡ Uploaded 9 episodes, with the 9th diving into the Jehovian seals πŸ’₯ https://www.collectiverising.earth/videos?wix-vod-comp-id=comp-mpoxl1ox

πŸ”₯8πŸ₯°4❀1

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

7 Jul 2026, 10:33 UTC291 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

We need to face the truth sooner rather than later because the longer we avoid it, the more we stay tangled in layers that were never ours, and only when the real story begins to reveal itself do we finally feel the first openings of genuine healing. This isn’t for those who want comfort or soft illusions, it’s for the ones who are actually seeking truths and are ready to recognise how much of what we were told was d…

❀10πŸ”₯4πŸ’―2

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

7 Jul 2026, 10:11 UTC262 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🀨3πŸ’―2😨1

Signed H AllureA πŸ’ŽπŸ’›πŸ’— @CollectiveRising

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CollectiveRising. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ…²πŸ…ΎπŸ…»πŸ…»πŸ…΄πŸ…²πŸ†ƒπŸ…ΈπŸ†…πŸ…΄ πŸ†πŸ…ΈπŸ†‚πŸ…ΈπŸ…½πŸ…Ά Kathara Bio-regenisisπŸ”₯πŸ’₯βœ¨β€ (@CollectiveRising), 791 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CollectiveRising.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.