Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗕𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡 + 𝗗𝗔𝗜𝗟𝗬 !

@ClubsConfession

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

46subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003874763499
TypeChannel
Username@ClubsConfession
Descriptionкредит на аватарку: https://t.me/yellowrabbit_arts принадлежит @sorrymyheadfelloff
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 24 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ClubsConfession

Growth

467 August 2026 — 46 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:3146no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1146first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.1%
avg views ÷ 46 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
17.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held18 (24 April 202619 July 2026)
Views total35
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
38
Videos
1
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

120 reactions across 17 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6655.0%
5445.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 120reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 11:10 UTC35 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Неанон: @vA1L_0 ТЕЙК // @Clubsconfession_bot

4👍2

Signed Жоцаз Зразовна

9 Jun 2026, 17:55 UTC123 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Здарова. Недавно на волне трендов глянула фильм "Обсессия" и чуть переварив, поняла, что главный герой очень напоминает мне Зонтика. Идеальный концепт "хорошего парня" в лучшем своём проявлении, он робкий, неуверенный и пугливый, но при этом совершенно нездорово эгоистичен. На самом деле, это и цепляет меня в Зонте ТЕЙК // @Clubsconfession_bot

4👍2

Signed

31 May 2026, 18:00 UTC143 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Хедканончики на ЗК Куро и на то, на сколько его привлекательным воспринимают жители км 1) в Курограде, Куромаку считается привлекательным, чуть ли не считается эталоном мужской красоты, чем иногда Куро пользуется в своих интересах, но тем не менее, общество ожидает от Куромаку не изменчивости его внешности, взглядов, характера и поведения, до момента, пока в моду войдёт что-то другое, что создаст общественное давлен

👍42

Signed отказано

14 May 2026, 16:41 UTC145 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Клеотянка https://t.me/PURIN_purepure ТЕЙК // @Clubsconfession_bot

👍62

Signed ♧ ‘ 𝙯𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙖 𝙡𝙮𝙪𝙠𝙤𝙫𝙣𝙖 ‘ .

14 May 2026, 15:53 UTC114 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🆕 🌟 🌨️🦋🅱️🦋🌨️ 😌: ВсратоАСК 13 Карт #Куромаку #Клео ♣️🪽|| @ClubsConfession

3👍3

Signed ♧ ‘ 𝙯𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙖 𝙡𝙮𝙪𝙠𝙤𝙫𝙣𝙖 ‘ .

13 May 2026, 05:49 UTC84 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ https://t.me/PURIN_purepure ТЕЙК // @Clubsconfession_bot

👍5

Signed ♧ ‘ 𝙯𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙖 𝙡𝙮𝙪𝙠𝙤𝙫𝙣𝙖 ‘ .

12 May 2026, 15:03 UTC89 viewsread 10 August 2026

🤩 прошу прощения за задержку тейка!! были проблемы с тейк ботом, но уже все поправили

Signed ♧ ‘ 𝙯𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙖 𝙡𝙮𝙪𝙠𝙤𝙫𝙣𝙖 ‘ .

12 May 2026, 15:02 UTC110 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

зонт по рефу из пинтереста...это должна была быть фем версия но по итогу они не особо вообще разнятся между собой😭 ТЕЙК // @Clubsconfession_bot

5👍2

Signed ♧ ‘ 𝙯𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙖 𝙡𝙮𝙪𝙠𝙤𝙫𝙣𝙖 ‘ .

8 May 2026, 09:15 UTC100 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🆕 🌟 🌨️🦋🅱️🦋🌨️ 😌: 水兵あ #Куромаку #Зонтик #Клео ♣️🪽|| @ClubsConfession

👍73

Signed ♧ ‘ 𝙯𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙖 𝙜𝙖𝙯𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙫𝙖 ‘ .

7 May 2026, 12:04 UTC87 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Уверена, что вы уже бессчётное количество раз видели рисунки Mornic, Ruan и др. (это пример не в обиду художникам!), поэтому... Эксклюзив в нашем кф! Контент художников из других соцсетей, который мало кто видел. 🌨️🦋🅱️🦋🌨️ 📱 : Samsam-G-Samsam #Куромаку ♣️🪽|| @ClubsConfession

👍83

Signed Ꭲᴩюɸᴇᴧь .𖥔 ݁ ˖ #Ꮁ᧘ᥲʙныйᏦᥙннᏦуρ᧐ⲙᥲκу #Ꮋᥲδуɯнᥙ᧘ 𝆬 𓎟𓎟

7 May 2026, 11:17 UTC103 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🌟 патриотично 🌨️🦋🅱️🦋🌨️ 😌: lucky #Куромаку ♣️🪽|| @ClubsConfession

👍94

Signed ♧ ‘ 𝙯𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙖 𝙜𝙖𝙯𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙫𝙖 ‘ .

6 May 2026, 15:07 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

🤩 давно не постили нондейли… с кем хотите завтра контент?

  1. с Куромаку! 🌟50%
  2. с Зонтиком! 🌟31%
  3. с Клео! 🌟19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍4

Signed ♧ ‘ 𝙯𝙧𝙖𝙯𝙖 𝙜𝙖𝙯𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙫𝙖 ‘ .

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ClubsConfession. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 May 2026, 15:07 UTCFinal Results16 voters

🤩 давно не постили нондейли… с кем хотите завтра контент?

  1. с Куромаку! 🌟50%
  2. с Зонтиком! 🌟31%
  3. с Клео! 🌟19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗖𝗟𝗨𝗕𝗦 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗙𝗘𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗢𝗡 + 𝗗𝗔𝗜𝗟𝗬 !” (@ClubsConfession), 46 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClubsConfession.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.