Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Felix Kinney!!(феликс кинни)

@ChiefFelixKinney

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

142subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002274766954
TypeChannel
Username@ChiefFelixKinney
Descriptionя главный Феликс кинни; пр хи/ши эдиты/рисунки анон - http://t.me/anonaskbot?start=1v412 щп - https://t.me/+OHUCncnziIlhZWNi личка - @chieifelixkinney прост))))))
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ChiefFelixKinney

Growth

14210 Aug 2026, 14:31 — 142 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:45 — 142 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:3110 Aug 2026, 14:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:45142no change
10 Aug 2026, 14:31142first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.2%
avg views ÷ 142 subscribers
Avg views / post
91.1
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held18 (26 March 202631 July 2026)
Views total638
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
88
Videos
19
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
41s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

338 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6719.8%
custom 53075314340370956506418.9%
custom 52289790205189511665616.6%
❤‍🔥4814.2%
💘4011.8%
🍓175.03%
💔154.44%
💋92.66%
🆒82.37%
🕊61.78%
🍌41.18%
🍾20.592%
10.296%
🥴10.296%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 338reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC60 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @rmotiichannelVideo

Я задолбалась го репосты можете ещё лайкнуть в тт https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4MAUCsp/

❤‍🔥8🆒1

29 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC101 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

я ещеп чекала подписчиков своих офигеть на меня очень талантливые люди подписаны ребята я вас очень люблю

💘5💋21

29 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC102 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

вообще какой то период времени думала что лучше переехать на другой канал и заставлять себя чтоьо делать но ))))) думаю что лучше не стоит и я останусь здеся

💘2

29 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC96 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

а ещё я тут....кангел рисую...... я ларп ни игру ни прохождение не смотрела просто очень давно хочу их нарисовать

💘3

29 Jul 2026, 19:44 UTC95 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

пушто я не знаю что вообще рисовать никаких идей нет мб какие нибудь реквесты можете написать с картами связанок я постораюсь чтонибудь накалякать

💘3

29 Jul 2026, 19:43 UTC92 viewsread 10 August 2026

я очень извиняюс за отствусвтб какого либо завоза У МЕНЯ ЕСТЬ ТОЛЬКО СКЕТЧИ но они не интересные +к картам никак не относятся все что есть это чиби куромаку

29 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC92 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

привет попищеки как ваши дела хочу общаться

💋4

13 Jun 2026, 08:50 UTC420 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026

начало массовой депортации из стран Прибалтики в 1941 году решение о создании управления стратегических служб (будущее ЦРУ) в 1942 году и дебют кпоп группы бтс в 2013 привело нас к этому

❤‍🔥15💘85custom 53075314340370956504🕊2

13 Jun 2026, 08:33 UTC346 views28 reactionsread 10 August 2026

я вычеркну этот день из календаря

❤‍🔥16custom 53075314340370956507custom 52289790205189511665

13 Jun 2026, 08:33 UTC240 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @okkomoviesPhoto

⚡👑 НАКОНЕЦ-ТО! Анонсируем дату премьеры 2-го сезона «13 КАРТ» в Okko. Карточные клоны вернутся на экраны ровно через два месяца — 13 августа! Вас ждут 9 новых серий, которые будут выходить каждое 13-е число месяца. А пока предлагаем взглянуть на постер и поугадывать в комментариях, что же создатели приготовили в новом сезоне!

10custom 53075314340370956507custom 52289790205189511666🍾2🍓1

8 Jun 2026, 15:31 UTC305 views49 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

япи

20💘12🆒7🕊4💋3❤‍🔥2🍓1

16 May 2026, 18:02 UTC381 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026

чувствую, что поступаю немного неправильно по отношению к вам 🤩🤩 мне правда очень-очень стыдно за то, что я оставляю вас без какого-либо контента уже около месяца. не знаю, просто нет никакой мотивации и желания, и я не могу обещать, что буду выкладывать сюда почеркухи чаще. но я буду стараться!

💔15custom 52289790205189511663custom 53075314340370956501

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ChiefFelixKinney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 982,545 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Felix Kinney!!(феликс кинни)” (@ChiefFelixKinney), 142 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChiefFelixKinney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.