Channel
@Cheizlol_kitchen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
377subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002211269139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Cheizlol_kitchen |
| Description | Сидим, болтаем на кухне о дизайне и жизни👽 Меня зовут Сережа, кста Написать лично: @Cheizlol |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Cheizlol_kitchen |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 377 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 377 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (8 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,098 |
| Reactions total | 63 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
107 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 68.2% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 27.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.87% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хорошо делайте. Плохо не делайте. Отдыхайте. Сильно не уставайте. Спите и ешьте. Ходите пешком. Зарядку делайте. ИИ не бойтесь. ИИ — хорошо. Но если думать головой. Если не думать головой — то плохо. С плохими заказчиками не работайте. С хорошими — работайте. Заботьтесь о себе в первую очередь. О других заботьтесь во вторую. Жизнь одна. Занимайтесь спортом. Улыбайтесь. Грустите, но в меру. Долго не грустите. Если чег…
❤10
Posted without readable text
❤8🔥3
Реализация личных проектов научила меня легко договариваться про деньги Любая задача стала очень осязаемой: я прикладываю X усилий — получаю Y результат. Или XX усилий и YY результат. Усилия — это время умноженное на напряжение (когнитивное, ролевое, эмоциональное). Результат — это деньги, капитализация личного бренда или удовольствие от реализации. Любой проект легко оценивается: я задолбаюсь на столько-то, а д…
❤5
Властелин колец. Часть 1 Прочитал первый том Властелина Колец, итого 3 книги из 5 уже позади Также сразу же посмотрел экранизацию (конечно же режиссерскую версию) Ситуация тут сильно отличается от Хоббита Если там на книгу в 300 страниц пришлось 3 фильма общим хронометражем в 9 часов, то здесь на книгу в 600 страниц приходится 1 фильм на 4 часа Результат соответствующий Сперва про книгу: понравилось больше Силь…
❤3
Самозванец среди дизайнеров Легко найдете его на этой фотокарточке Спасибо Лере Гавриловой, собрала классных дизов (я проник), обсудили насущные вопросы (кудрявые волосы и Ведьмака) Было очень содержательно и вайбово, разбили бокал (пошел он) Меня узнали с фразой «о, это ты тот чел, который писал посты про армию» — приятно, что замечают мой вклад в эту реальность. Автограф не попросили (отстой) Лимонад был хорош…
❤15🔥5
Гулял Фотографировал
🔥6
Недели две пытаюсь придумать пост Живу жизнь, много всего происходит и я такой "О, можно написать про это. И про это. О, ещё вот это есть" Идеи классные, опыт интересный, только что толку, если посты в итоге не написаны?) Когда долгое время не ведёшь канал регулярно, все эти "идеи постов" так и будут оставаться фантазиями А чтобы действительно начать что-то публиковать, нужно регулярно что-то публиковать. Всё Зв…
🔥5❤3
Продолжаю изучать Толкина На прошлой неделе прочитал книгу "Хоббит или туда и обратно". Хорошая сказка, добрые персонажи, ну.. норм! Решил посмотреть трилогию Питера Джексона. Смотрел её в 2012-2014 годах в кинотеатре и мало что помнил Приступая к просмотру, я удивился, что экранизация книги на 300 страниц заняла три фильма общим хронометражем почти в 9 часов Я нигде такого не видел. Просмотр фильма занял в два р…
❤8
Начал изучать Толкина Я ни разу не смотрел "Властелин колец" полностью. Решил всё-таки исправить этот момент, но перед просмотром всех фильмов я сперва пошел читать книги Начал я с Сильмариллиона Я понимал, что это штука специфическая и пусть хронологически идёт первой, всё же правильнее было оставить её на потом, когда я пойму ПРИКОЛ лора Толкина Но я пошел по харду и пошел читать именно её И впечатления двойст…
❤3❤🔥2
Подкаст с юристом (крутым) Друзья, новый выпуск) ⬛️Слушать подкаст В гостях не дизайнер, а мега ультра крутой юрист!!!!1111 Анастасия Демченко жёстко шарит за интеллектуальную собственность. Мы ей вопросы задавали, а она нам очень интересно отвечала (причём понятными словами, большое ей за это спасибо реально) Мы хейтеры правового нигилизма. Мы за правовое поле. Но правила на этом поле иногда такие, что пару кул…
🔥10❤4👏2
Ну чё как вы, малютки? Я лично в ахуе, но ничего, на жестких плюс мораличах двигаюсь, слежу за кукухой твёрдо и чётко Интересна ваша судьба. Кто забыл (или не знал) как я выгляжу — наблюдайте👒
❤14❤🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Cheizlol_kitchen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 425,627 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“На дизайн-кухне с другом” (@Cheizlol_kitchen), 377 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cheizlol_kitchen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.