Channel
@COVOhub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
51subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003064475713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @COVOhub |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/COVOhub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:37 | 51 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 50 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 50 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (15 February 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 362 |
| Reactions total | 39 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
155 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 110 | 71.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 23 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 9.03% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.94% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.29% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.645% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.645% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.645% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏦 Let's begin in 15th-century Florence, where Filippo Brunelleschi, the Renaissance architect and inventor, was granted a temporary exclusive right for one of his inventions. Today, this is widely regarded as one of the earliest milestones in the evolution of intellectual property protection and the modern patent system. That same principle now underpins sophisticated patent systems around the world, enabling innova…
❤4🔥1
Part 1 | More Than a Century of Transformation: From Football to the Future of Sports Medicine ⚽️ Over the past century, the FIFA World Cup has evolved into one of the world's most influential platforms for innovation and technology. Today, AI, Big Data, wearable technologies, IoT, robotics, and advanced analytics are transforming football by improving athlete performance, preventing injuries, enhancing medical dec…
❤3👍1
From the World Cup Spotlight to the Future of Sports Medicine ⚽️ With the dramatic 2026 FIFA World Cup now behind us, it's time to look beyond the final score and explore the evolution of football and sports medicine. 🤖 Modern football is no longer just about tactics and goals. Sports medicine, artificial intelligence, data analytics, wearable technologies, and next-generation recovery methods are redefining the fu…
❤4🔥2
Right in the midst of war and flames, there were those who kept believing... Believing in growth, in the journey ahead, and in the power of their unwavering perseverance. ✨ Now, as we look back, we see nothing but pride. 🎉 Congratulations to our inventors on their outstanding achievements at the International Women's Invention Exposition in South Korea 🇰🇷 🥇 Gold Medal Dr. Yaser Asghari Head of COVO Health 🥉 Bron…
❤11
Three days of intensive judging at one of the world's most prestigious international invention exhibitions transformed years of research, creativity, perseverance, and dedication into well-earned medals. Today, we are proud to announce that all 18 inventions submitted with COVO to the Korea International Women Entrepreneurs Invention Exposition (KIWIE 2026) were honored with medals: 🥇 5 Gold Medals 🥈 2 Silver Meda…
❤🔥7🔥3❤2🏆1
🤝 We’re proud to announce our strategic partnership with Wappnet Systems, a leading software development and outsourced IT company headquartered in India, with a global presence across the United Arab Emirates and the United States. With expertise in custom software development, cloud computing, mobile applications, web solutions, and enterprise technologies, Wappnet Systems helps businesses accelerate digital trans…
❤5❤🔥3👍1
Every innovation has a story. Some stories never get the chance to be seen. Others begin with one simple decision: the decision to step into the spotlight. Today is the final day to register for the China International Innovation Competition 🇨🇳 If you believe your innovation deserves global recognition, don't let this opportunity pass you by. This could be the first step on your international journey. 🌍 📩 To reg…
❤5🔥3
🇨🇳 IEI 2026 | International Exhibition of Inventions Take your invention to one of Asia’s leading international innovation exhibitions and present your achievements on a global stage. 🏆 Opportunity to gain international recognition 🌐 Attending a global innovation event 💻 Online Participation 📍 Guangzhou, China 📅 Application Deadline: June 30, 2026 Whether you're an inventor, startup, university researcher, or inn…
❤🔥6❤4
Most companies say innovation is “strategic.” Far fewer lead it from the top. Boston Consulting Group (BCG)’s 2021 Most Innovative Companies report reveals a stark gap: 🔹️Nearly 90% of high innovation performers have clear C-suite ownership. 🔹️Among underperformers, it’s about 20%. Same word,Innovation. Very different leadership. In top companies, CEOs don’t just fund innovation. They shape the ambition, stay clo…
❤9🔥3
Innovation is a top-three priority. Budgets are up. Yet a major readiness gap remains. According to the “Most Innovative Companies” report by Boston Consulting Group: 🔹 Nearly 50% of companies see themselves as committed innovators. 🔹 But 74% of them still fail to reach innovation readiness. 🔹 Only about 20% of organizations are truly ready to scale innovation. 🔹 Ready companies are up to 4× more likely to generate…
❤9
INNOVATION budgets are RISEing. Priority is rising too... 📍 But impact often isn’t. Boston Consulting Group (BCG)’s “Most Innovative Companies 2021” report makes the uncomfortable point: the constraint is rarely money. It’s readiness. Using its Innovation-to-Impact (i2i) framework, BCG shows that only about 20% of companies are truly “ready” to scale innovation, even when budgets exist. Innovation fails when it’…
❤6👌1
A recent report by Massachusetts Institute of Technology News highlights a powerful shift in construction thinking: buildings shouldn’t be treated as endpoints but as material banks 🏗️♻️ Researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology argue that steel, concrete, and structural components can be reused instead of discarded, reducing emissions and resource waste. With digital tracking and AI tools, large-scale ma…
❤🔥6❤2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @COVOhub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 72,049 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COVO Hub” (@COVOhub), 51 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/COVOhub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.