Channel
@CDvip77
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,815subscribers
+1,277 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003882898921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CDvip77 |
| Created | 10 March 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CDvip77 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 1,815 | +1,268 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 547 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 538 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (10 March 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 524 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🏆 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎟️ 抽奖标题：成都柳如烟（商家活动）🎁 📪抽奖说明：中奖者机器人会发送中奖信息 兑奖联系：@ciuz1 服务介绍👉点击预览 🎫 参与条件: 🎫 加入-成都大众点评✍🏻 🎫 加入-成都武侯区柳如烟小窝 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 口令红包12 × 1 💰️ 夜课优惠券500 × 6 💰️ 2P优惠券200 × 8 💰️ 1P优惠券100 × 8 📅 开奖时间：2026-08-08 18:00自动开奖 👉 参与抽奖链接: https://t.me/zzbjqrbot?start=join-L178594879325
出击日期📆：8月4日凌晨 老师芳名🎀：彤彤 联系方式💬：@tong2088 定位坐标🔰：#成华区(二仙桥) 授课学费💲：500 投稿留名🐺：凹凸曼 过程描述📝：✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻 不会觉得尴尬，人很亲近，服务技术一流，口技简直，包裹嘴里绝了，灵动柔软的舌头在里面不断的卷动，滑上滑下，像条小蛇一样的灵动，太爽了，太久没感受过这么爽这么正式的莞式服务了，换了几个姿势360°来回换👄，也不催，最后直接👄出来，太爽了，完全释放，一次就爽的透透的，下次还来。 老师长相与身材1-10⭐:（8） 功课及服务评分1-10⭐:（9.5） 推荐及满意程度1-10⭐:（9） 🔎以上内容由狼友真实反馈📬 成都星期八俱乐部🎖 @CDxqiba028 成都星期⑧动态榜🎖 @jsnhua 报告投稿接收管理🎖 @yuleqbbot
出击日期📆：8月3日 老师芳名🎀：琳达 联系方式💬：@Gems_Linda 定位坐标🔰：#武侯区 授课学费💲：700 投稿留名🐺：蕉太狼 过程描述📝：✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻 本次体验特别满意，妹妹整体素质非常出色。全程认真负责，服务细致周到，全程耐心贴心，态度温和有礼，素养很高，过程踏实用心，细节方面把控到位，让人感觉十分舒服放松。瑶瑶长相耐看，标准嫩妹，五官精致气质优雅，身形匀称苗条，外形条件十分优越。待人亲切大方，沟通轻松自然，全程服务节奏恰到好处，不刻意不敷衍，整体体验感极佳。无论是服务态度、专业素养还是个人形象都无可挑剔，整体感受非常舒心，非常值得推荐。 老师长相与身材1-10⭐: (9) 功课及服务评分1-10⭐: (10) 推荐及满意程度1-10⭐: (9) 🔎以上内容由狼友真实反馈📬 成都星期八俱乐部🎖 @CDxqiba028 成都星期⑧动态榜🎖 @jsnhua 报告投稿接收管理🎖 @yuleqbbot
🏆1👍1
报告快查🔍方法， 方法①:点击右上角三个点搜索栏输入老师用户名或者老师名称即可快速查看你心仪老师的评论列表。 方法②:输入 # 号➕区域名称然后在左上角点击此聊天查看，将会显示你所需区域老师的评论。 特别提醒:如报告还在，但人已经不在榜单推广，请勿出击，以免老师号换了人或者号被盗，我们榜单认证期30天，超过30天未从新认证报道的，都有诈骗风险。甄别方法复制老师联系方式，在我们榜单点击又上角点三个点搜索🔍，如果没有显示这个老师，说明认证已过期。请勿出击，以免被骗。
出击日期📆： 老师芳名🎀： 联系方式💬： 定位坐标🔰： 授课学费💲： 投稿留名🐺： 过程描述📝：✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻✍🏻 老师长相与身材1-10⭐:（） 功课及服务评分1-10⭐:（） 推荐及满意程度1-10⭐:（） 🔎以上内容由狼友真实反馈📬 成都星期八俱乐部🎖 @CDxqiba028 成都星期⑧动态榜🎖 @jsnhua 报告投稿接收管理🎖 @yuleqbbot
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @CDvip77. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 266,439 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都大众点评✍🏻” (@CDvip77), 1,815 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CDvip77.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.