Channel
@chengdubantao398
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,581subscribers
+1,667 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003161656004 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chengdubantao398 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chengdubantao398 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 4,581 | -354 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 4,935 | +1,838 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 3,097 | +183 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 2,914 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (5 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,210 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎟️ 抽奖标题：成都高端靠谱工作室的活动 📪抽奖说明：中奖者机器人会发送中奖信息 兑奖联系：@cd02888 服务内容介绍👉点击预览 注兑奖截止开奖后7天内有效。 本次抽奖最终解释权归成都高端靠谱工作室所有 🎫 参与条件: 🎫 加入-成都大众点评✍🏻 🎫 加入-成都靠谱半套/全套工作室 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 南门半套优惠券30 × 5 💰️ 南门全套优惠券50 × 5 💰️ 红包口令18 × 1 💰️ 红包口令88 × 2 💰️ 红包口令188 × 1 📅 开奖时间：2026-08-10 18:00自动开奖 👉 参与抽奖链接: https://t.me/zzbjqrbot?start=join-L178611924842
Live stream started
CD今日楼盘❤️https://share.feijipan.com/s/x92jJdEw 营业时间：中午12：00-凌晨01：00 10秒没回致电：181 4434 0869
成都靠谱半套/全套工作室 pinned «亲爱的朋友们！客服小姐姐根据你们平时最多的疑问进行以下↓列举 才学有限将就看看吧！ 1️⃣什么是半套 通常以“BT或KB”来代替，全身赤裸0距离接触（可根据个人喜好要求制服丝袜），时长均为90分钟，包含了一系列调情服务最后小口包茎出水(服务时间内可多次尽兴) 2️⃣是否可选人 公寓酒店类型，一个房间一个仙女，可以看心仪的预约或者到了客服安排，看了本人不满意有空位是可以换的！（拒绝多看几个再选择的行为） 3️⃣如何付费 无需定金，选中仙女后先支付费用给小妹Ps支持微信.支付宝.最好现金（先收费后服务望大家理解…»
亲爱的朋友们！客服小姐姐根据你们平时最多的疑问进行以下↓列举 才学有限将就看看吧！ 1️⃣什么是半套 通常以“BT或KB”来代替，全身赤裸0距离接触（可根据个人喜好要求制服丝袜），时长均为90分钟，包含了一系列调情服务最后小口包茎出水(服务时间内可多次尽兴) 2️⃣是否可选人 公寓酒店类型，一个房间一个仙女，可以看心仪的预约或者到了客服安排，看了本人不满意有空位是可以换的！（拒绝多看几个再选择的行为） 3️⃣如何付费 无需定金，选中仙女后先支付费用给小妹Ps支持微信.支付宝.最好现金（先收费后服务望大家理解 每一份工作都不容易，已经遇到过很多不轨人士恶意逃单） 4️⃣不满意可退费吗 已经开始服务后中途因个人原因需提前离开的或结束服务离开房间恶意投诉的均不退费！ 如果在服务过程中女孩服务态度有问题与您发生不愉快，请在离开房间前联系客服核实情况，定会马上解决问题维护您的权益！ 5️⃣图片就是本人吗 大多女孩都是成都人或成都周边的 …
❤1
095098温馨提示:与你秒回哟❤️ 10秒没回致电18144340869 或者添加与你:cd095098
温馨提示:与你秒回哟❤️ 10秒没回致电18144340869 或者添加与你:cd095098
温馨提示:与你秒回哟❤️ 10秒没回致电18144340869 或者添加与你:cd095098
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @chengdubantao398. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 957,849 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都靠谱半套/全套工作室” (@chengdubantao398), 4,581 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chengdubantao398.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.