Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Костромская поведенческая терапия

@CBT_Ivanova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

446subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001729038027
TypeChannel
Username@CBT_Ivanova
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CBT_Ivanova

Growth

4444464457 August 2026 — 444 subscribers8 August 2026 — 444 subscribers14 August 2026 — 446 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 444–446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:37446+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:04444no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:17444first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
232.0%
avg views ÷ 446 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,030
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.435%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held16 (14 August 20253 August 2026)
Views total2,069
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

481 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15031.2%
😁9519.8%
❤‍🔥418.52%
🐳408.32%
🥰377.69%
🎉347.07%
316.44%
🌚102.08%
🔥102.08%
😭91.87%
🤗51.04%
🤣51.04%
👍30.624%
😍20.416%
🤓20.416%
🤔20.416%
🤡20.416%
👎10.208%
😨10.208%
🤨10.208%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 481reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈1,990 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

«Любая достаточно развитая технология неотличима от магии» А. Кларк

😁2

3 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC79 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dimapomogaet

ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕ ТЕХНИКИ ДПДГ (EMDR) В РАМКАХ ДРУГИХ ТЕРАПЕВТИЧЕСКИХ ПОДХОДОВ Здесь вы можете прочитать что такое ДПДГ и как проходит типичная сессия, а для простоты я придумал метафору: десенсибилизация и проработка движениями глаз счищает эмоциональный налет, как ржавчину и старую краску, на воспоминании или предполагаемой пугающей ситуации. (Там есть ещё второй аспект, который в этой метафоре будет выглядеть как нан

5🔥2

4 May 2026, 15:41 UTC354 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#всякое Я проникла сегодня в тайну, которая меня мучила 25 лет. В тайну бычка качающегося, вздыхающего на ходу. Необъяснимая деталь стихотворения Агнии Барто вызывала у меня маленькой нехорошую тревогу от столкновения с иррациональным. Доска. Зачем он ходит по ней? Почему обязательно упадет в конце? В чем смысл этих страданий, этой прихотливой фантазии автора? Бычки не то чтобы много качаются и падают, и тем более не

21😁20🐳4🔥2

30 Mar 2026, 09:03 UTC367 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dimapomogaetPhoto

Помните у меня был пост с психологами психиатрами и психотерапевтами, которых я рекомендую? Старый пост удалился когда я чистил канал (там поехали все ссылки), а новый мне писать впадлу потому что кто в декрете, кто загружен, кто в отпуске, а кто-то и новый появился. Пишете напрямую мне @dimaduk, я подберу вам специалиста под вашу проблему, если сам за нее не возьмусь

61🤨1

16 Mar 2026, 17:20 UTC630 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#всякое Я тут поленилась было вставать за книжкой про ОРКТ и решила, что deepseek сэкономит мои килоджоули декретной энергии, ловко прикинувшись коллегой-орктшником. В некотором роде он действительно помог! Помнишь, брат, как давили эльфийскую мразь?

😁27😭9🤣53🐳3😨1

25 Feb 2026, 11:20 UTCviews —

Костромская поведенческая терапия pinned a photo

25 Feb 2026, 11:10 UTC≈1,590 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#оргвопросы Скоро март, и я, как и собиралась, вернусь к консультированию. Приходите! Я могу взять 1-2 человек в день, график довольно плавающий. Проще будет тем, кто хочет поработать в первой половине дня по Москве. С вечером потруднее, но решаемо.

🥰24😁7🔥4🐳21

25 Oct 2025, 16:28 UTC824 views67 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#всякое Меж тем, мне в понедельник исполнилось тридцать лет. Дочь родилась незадолго до этого, для волновавшихся - не волнуйтесь, с нами обеими все в порядке, и спасибо большое вам за участие с: Муж напомнил, что когда-то я вела в ВК небольшой блог про свои медицинские приключения. Я перечитала его и поразилась тому, как поменялась с тех пор моя жизнь. В сущности, во многом мои временные и денежные вложения в карьер

🎉3429🐳2😍2

25 Sept 2025, 12:57 UTC≈1,140 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#всякое Вообще, я очень благодарна себе из прошлого за то, что действительно практиковала на регулярной основе все эти простенькие занудные приемчики из ACT и КПТ. Ночью на меня налетел безумный окситоциновый шторм и почти вынудил купить букварь с Буквоёжиком и несколько пособий с нейропсихологическими упражнениями (ребенка ещё нет и до момента, когда нужен будет букварь, стоит сперва дожить). Буквоёжик манил мягкой

😁2410🐳7

16 Sept 2025, 19:28 UTC713 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Все так! #мимзы Вообще, судя по тому, сколько человек захотело посетить мои консультации перед отплыздом в отпуск, вы меня прямо-таки читаете. Это очень удивительно, спасибо. Мне приятно. Ешьте больше овощей! (ну вот правда)

129🐳3

16 Sept 2025, 19:28 UTC837 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sorokinantonpsyPhoto

Картинку тут смешную увидел

🌚10🐳3

4 Sept 2025, 01:07 UTC843 views58 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#всякое Это еще что. Вот вынырну я из декрета, клиентура-то к тому времени подрассосется, молоко иссякнет, а я как поднатужусь, поднапружусь, да как начну продающие посты писать. Буду ваши боли разводить руками. Я ученая. Знаете, как надо? Вот вы, например, хотите жить хорошо, а живете - плохо. Ну вот тут-то я каааак подкрадусь, каааак поясню вам, что хорошая жизнь - дело-то нехитрое, в общем, даже конструируемое, и

❤‍🔥27😁158🤗5🤓2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @CBT_Ivanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 858,660 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Костромская поведенческая терапия” (@CBT_Ivanova), 446 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CBT_Ivanova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.