Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BullishBrothers • NO PAID CALLS

@BullishBrothers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001782367894
TypeChannel
Username@BullishBrothers
DescriptionThe important B in the crypto space! BullishBrothers.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 12 October 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BullishBrothers

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:3113no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:2013first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 October 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
19
Videos
4
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1150.0%
👏1045.5%
🔥14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2022 to 23 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2024, 21:45 UTC37 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Doggo Buy! 🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙🪙 💵 0.50 ETH ($1329.25) 🪙 31,645,251 DOGGO 🔷 0x87b0…58f8 | Txn 🔼 Position +26.86% 🔼 Market Cap $17,691,945 🥇 Chart 🔵 Trade 🔹 Trending

17 Feb 2023, 17:46 UTC74 viewsread 12 August 2026

SHARBI - live on Arbitrum ERC20 UPDATE launched on ETH and both over 1m mcap! This projects was made safemoon , Shiba and others whales! Big names like SC supporting. - usdc rewards - no mw fee - no dev fee https://t.me/SharbiPortal https://www.dextools.io/app/en/arbitrum/pair-explorer/0xc0b4d8affe04ad24ce6c52672a885df669ef3f9a https://sharbi.net/

1 Feb 2023, 22:45 UTCviews —

BullishBrothers • NO PAID CALLS pinned «Called this at 79K mcap! Now look at it new ATH 750K !! Just early»

1 Feb 2023, 22:45 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Called this at 79K mcap! Now look at it new ATH 750K !! Just early

👍1

29 Jan 2023, 13:30 UTC60 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

SHARBI - live on Arbitrum ERC20 This projects was made safemoon , Shiba and others whales! Big names like SC supporting. - usdc rewards - no mw fee - no dev fee https://t.me/SharbiPortal https://www.dextools.io/app/en/arbitrum/pair-explorer/0xc0b4d8affe04ad24ce6c52672a885df669ef3f9a https://sharbi.net/

👍1

17 Nov 2022, 14:47 UTC302 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/CryptoWinterPortal 0x1596E7E8AF16A677acB0a8c6eF861AFB9642c269 Pure diamonds 💎

👍1

30 Oct 2022, 03:07 UTC168 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

God has given us all many gifts. One of them is to be able and allowed to speak freely. #FreeSpeech #ELONMUSK @elonmusk #Anonymous anonymous-crypto.com Join: https://t.me/+lD50K3znWJphNjgy

👍3

26 Oct 2022, 21:34 UTCviews —

BullishBrothers • NO PAID CALLS pinned «Elon Tweeted something with Anonymous. Let’s push this for Anonymous Crypto which have already top comment position Raid that, elon tweeted about Anonymous!! https://twitter.com/theanonymcrypto/status/1585284299921793028?s=46&t=dVrDydQU9o9OHQ7jSXF7kQ»

26 Oct 2022, 21:34 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Elon Tweeted something with Anonymous. Let’s push this for Anonymous Crypto which have already top comment position Raid that, elon tweeted about Anonymous!! https://twitter.com/theanonymcrypto/status/1585284299921793028?s=46&t=dVrDydQU9o9OHQ7jSXF7kQ

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BullishBrothers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,029,330 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BullishBrothers • NO PAID CALLS” (@BullishBrothers), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BullishBrothers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.