Dor
❤1

Channel
@Boostherkate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
824subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001749518324 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Boostherkate |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Boostherkate |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 824 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 825 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 20 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 5 | 83.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2024 to 20 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Dor
❤1
Guys
Heffi mensive bus
🐳5
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ ㅤㅤ𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐜𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨' ㅤㅤ𝐊𝐢𝐦 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐣𝐢'𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐛𝐢𝐫𝐭𝐡𝐝𝐚𝐲 ㅤㅤ𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐮𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 ㅤㅤ𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬. ㅤㅤ─────── ✨˚.⊹ ─────── 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐬𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐚𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐜, 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞. 𝐖𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐚 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐧, 𝐞𝐯𝐨𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧, 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐟𝐮𝐥 𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 • • • ˑ ◌ ִ ✨ ㅤ
ㅤ ︶ ⏝ 💜˚⋆ Aforementioned transient entice emanating from the holographic wavelength, as it rekindles the core of consciousness and crafts a bewitching spell providing seizes the intellect. Stirs up the deepest hunger of the soul for an innumerable eternity. Presently can be seen some of the painting's intriguing swirls and twists, as well as synchronized things that thrill adolescents with all of her sweetness and …
Sticker, posted without a caption
VOL 0:98 | INKED–’ 26 “The Glory O’ Spheres” II : GLAMOROUS │A steaming infusion of afternoon │tea, soundtracked by the dulcet │tones of a timeless vinyl record. │This unpretentious existence │resonates with profound │contentment.
🖋..│ The piano’s dulcet strains cascade through the air, guiding the soul to a bygone era. In this humble haven, my porch, I discover beauty in the ordinary. /🎐.. heretofore, may you perhaps lay hold of an invitation to join our #NEWSpringWithYou tonight? ﹙MP4﹚ ﹙PNG﹚ [ .. ] An effusion of unbridled jubilation permeates the atmosphere …
Sticker, posted without a caption
#BlissfulVerseOfJeno
ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ“𝗟𝗘𝗘 𝗝𝗘𝗡𝗢'𝗦 𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗗𝗟𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗪𝗔𝗟𝗧𝗭” ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ··· ㅤ(II.) 2000’S ─────────────────── ❍ .ㅤ. 태어난 ︱ Crepuscular pyres flicker, tracing chiaroscuro dances upon reverie's tapestry as a celestial descends. ㅤ #BlissfulVerseOfJeno ···───ㅤ𖡩 23:04 Though the crimson tethers of time bind him ever so slightly to the mortal plane . . . his gaze retains the luminescence of a fallen star. ㅤ
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Boostherkate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 478,274 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Boostherkate named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗕𝗢𝗢𝗦𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗞𝗔𝗧𝗘” (@Boostherkate), 824 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Boostherkate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.