Channel
@LittleJeans
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,973subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001880200639 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LittleJeans |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LittleJeans |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 1,973 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 1,983 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 1,988 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 1,988 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (29 October 2025 – 21 July 2026) |
| Views total | 95 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 🪽𖦹 ׂ 𓈒 𝗴𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝘀𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗶𝗻𝘆 𝘀𝗼𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝗱𝗮𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗱ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ૮꒰♡ ´ #4EVERWITHNEWJEANS ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ──◍───── 𝅄 ׄ ֵ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ floating softly up𖦹n of a bed and thou shalt find rest in this safe, lovely dream as the soft stars do shine ₊☆
ᨳ 📆˚。ִ a tokki waiting behind fluffy clouds where tiny bunny hops mᧉᧉt feather light wings. sparkles drift through the book, making every little corner feel calm and full of love. sweet moments bloom as smiles brighten the day ₊˚⊹ ♡₊˚⋆ 𝚙𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚠𝚜 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑 𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚛…
🌐💚∘˙○˚.• S Y S T E M R E A D Y KANG HAERIN FEAST ˚｡𖦹 #All20ForHaerin …
Bright Spectrum: oscillated when the "pulse of jam" <<< shades around spiral edges >>> #NEON FLOW INNATE. 𝄞⨾𓍢ִ໋ Hyperlink to the rhythm where connected with full circuit as signal overdrive through back pedal of jukebox, blast from bypassing event and synth-pop electric dropped down after moving lines. Aerodynamic calibrated to prismatic strategies of gentle motion once Kang Haerin's birthday breakdown on M…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ Fierce Edutorials ❤️ #22LooksOfMinji "𝘽𝙊𝙍𝙉 𝙏𝙊 𝘿𝙊𝙈𝙄𝙉𝘼𝙏𝙀 𝙏𝙃𝙀 𝙁𝙍𝘼𝙈𝙀." Sprawled across spreads ignited the spotlight as her milestone dawned. Magnetic glow syncing with Kim Minji era's pulse while trends evolved, spotlights blazed and legacies ignited. Ready to join the 𝙶𝙻𝙰𝙼-𝙿𝙰𝙶𝙴𝚂? ㅤ ㅤ
ㅤ In the heart of KIM MINJI’s stark studio domain, she stood poised, sharp yet restless, locked in focus amid buzzing gear and shadowed corners. Drawn to a pulsing neon signal, a hint of chaos barely in grasp, flickering through cracked windows like a dare. So will this fire reveal its edge as her birthday hits on 07th Of May, igniting runways and feeds alike?ㅤ ㅤ %★.. UNDER STARK QUIET NODS: ㅤ The magnificent …
Scrupulous birthday courses throughout our agglomerate feelings. The passing time since our calm countdown has turned into sprightly sprint, munch tender waver touched by the nearing crest on april eleven’s finish line. Fortwith, the fated tick blossoms at track’s fond terminus. For the amber-bright bliss she disperses along her footfall: #21MilesToDanielle. Our grandest praises weave soft garlands to celebrating…
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ Dulcet glossaries: Danielle Marsh’s jubilant earns alongwith charm step. Courteous-runner-sparks ⋆˚࿔ Birthday prancing within dandelion fizz. Cheery sunbeams seem into hitchhike on her sneaker / 𝟷𝟷 𝙰𝙿𝚁𝙸𝙻 🌟 Today feels like happy finish line just for her. Dash carries pocketful merriment underneath this date. ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ
lend us a hand to spread this, jelis! danke 🩷
ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤHELP FORWARD ◌˳𓇬 A magical door glowed softly behind closed eyes, radiating charm like a hidden treasure waiting to be found. Joy sparked in hurried footsteps drawn toward the light, leading to a coastline where the breeze sang and the sun sank gently beneath the horizon. A moment suspended in golden hush, as if time itself paused to listen. Now begins .. the search for mirrored stars dupl…
happy mensive!
happy mensive liljeans 🩷🩷
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @LittleJeans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 162,931 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 36 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@LittleJeans named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LittleJeans.” (@LittleJeans), 1,973 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LittleJeans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.