Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Анна Грикевич | Недержание, вагинизм, менопауза, опущение

@Bloomcareru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

13,180subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001679957373
TypeChannel
Username@Bloomcareru
Description🇷🇺🇺🇸DPT | Физический терапевт, основатель BloomCare Здесь о восстановлении тазового дна, недержании, опущении органов малого таза, тазовой боли, вагинизме, менопаузе и здоровье Записаться на прием в клинику: https://clinic.bloomcare.ru/
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Bloomcareru

Growth

13,15413,18013,1676 August 2026 — 13,156 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,158 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,154 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,159 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,170 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,171 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,170 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,180 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 8 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,150–13,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 16:3813,180+10
13 Aug 2026, 06:2413,170-1
12 Aug 2026, 03:0513,171+1
11 Aug 2026, 05:2813,170+11
10 Aug 2026, 04:2113,159+5
8 Aug 2026, 09:4513,154-4
7 Aug 2026, 07:1513,158+2
6 Aug 2026, 08:3513,156first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 13,180 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,560
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held19 (2 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total29,724
Reactions total470
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
648
Videos
765
Links
443

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 40s
Average length
1m 31s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

450 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
29064.4%
🔥10022.2%
👍255.56%
🥰153.33%
🙏71.56%
😭61.33%
😁40.889%
👌20.444%
🤗10.222%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 470reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC994 views14 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

Судя по опросу, большинство из вас такой связи не замечали 👡 Но у некоторых действительно бывает так: стоит надеть каблуки, и позывы в туалет становятся чаще или сильнее. Почему это происходит и какое отношение к этому могут иметь мышцы тазового дна, подробно рассказываю в видео 👆🏻 Если вы замечаете у себя такую связь или другие симптомы, которые могут быть связаны со спазмом тазового дна, важно разобраться в прич

7🔥7

12 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC≈1,200 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Было ли у вас такое, что, когда надеваете каблуки, в туалет хочется сильнее?

  1. Да, замечала такое9%
  2. Возможно, но не связывала одно с другим17%
  3. Нет74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3

12 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 14 August 2026

👇🏻 Возможно, мой вопрос кому-то покажется странным, но…

11 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,510 views93 reactionsread 14 August 2026

После этого видео мы с вами стали ещё ближе 😁 Рассказываю, что здесь происходит: вместе с гинекологами и врачами УЗИ-диагностики мы планируем исследование, где нужна объективизация в результате и диагностике мышц тазового дна. 📋 И чтобы можно было оценить не только анатомические параметры, но и функциональные, мы решили взглянуть на ультразвуковую диагностику мышц таза под другим углом. Поэтому сегодня на УЗИ я ви

48🔥32👍5😁4🥰3🤗1

11 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,350 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍6

10 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈1,410 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Не всё, что болит в тазу = спазм мышц тазового дна 😖 Часто при тазовой боли пациенту сразу рекомендуют расслаблять мышцы: «дышать в промежность» или делать массажи (иногда они помогают, но затем все возвращается обратно, а иногда, наоборот, приводят к обострению). Почему же так происходит? 1. Потому что напряжение мышц тазового дна может быть компенсаторным. Например, если ягодичные мышцы или приводящие мышцы бедр

12

10 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC≈1,580 views34 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

А теперь углубимся в тему массажа промежности 💆🏻‍♀️ Важно: это не первая линия терапии. И ещё важнее: даже если вам назначили массаж как вторую/третью ступень реабилитации, то выполнять массаж нужно тоже правильно! Поэтому в видео разобрала все нюансы: когда массаж промежности вообще может быть уместен, когда он не нужен и как правильно выполнять технику. Если тема тазовой боли для вас актуальна — обязательно пос

34

9 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈1,610 views31 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🫁 А вы умеете дышать «в задние рёбра»? Одного «правильного» паттерна дыхания не существует. Мы все дышим по-разному, и важно развивать те направления дыхания, которые у вас задействованы меньше. Например, в упражнениях на расслабление мышц тазового дна мы часто направляем дыхание в низ живота и стараемся мягко расслаблять переднюю брюшную стенку. Но это далеко не единственная техника, которую мы используем. Сегодн

20👍11

8 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,740 views21 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

👼🏻 Недавно стали мамой? Начните с этих упражнений! Реабилитация для тех, кто родил через естественные родовые пути и путем кесарева сечения, немного отличается в первые 6-8 недель после рождения малыша. Именно поэтому я подготовила для вас 2 видео (ЕС и КС) – выбирайте подходящее и выполняйте упражнения в комфортном темпе. 💌 Сохраняйте пост: пусть эти тренировки будут под рукой, когда захочется немного позаботитьс

19🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,810 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

«У меня выпала часть прямой кишки, и теперь я боюсь ходить в туалет» 🚽 Именно с такой историей ко мне обратилась пациентка. Первые проблемы с дефекацией появились ещё после родов. Затем во время диареи произошло выпадение части прямой кишки, после чего появился страх каждой дефекации, а мышцы тазового дна перестали расслабляться — сформировалась диссинергия. Реабилитацию начали с расслабления. Пациентка приезжала

17😭6🥰4👍1🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,920 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Массаж промежности: как снизить риск разрывов при родах? Вчера я упоминала массаж промежности как важный инструмент подготовки к родам. Поэтому давайте разберём технику – как делать массаж самой себе или с партнером. Промежность — это мышцы и ткани между входом во влагалище и анусом. Именно они растягиваются на потугах, и если ткани неэластичные, случаются разрывы/врачу приходится делать надрез (эпизиотомию). Ре

21👍2

5 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC≈1,750 views18 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🍼 Как тазовая терапия помогает до и после родов? | Разбираем в 2-х частях В 1️⃣-м видео я делюсь историей беременной пациентки, которая обратилась ко мне с недержанием мочи и другими неприятными симптомами. Там рассказываю: • почему такие симптомы вообще возникают; • и как мы с этим справились. Во 2️⃣-м подробно раскрываю: • на что мы обращаем внимание во время осмотра мышц тазового дна; • какие ещё структуры оцен

🔥134🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Bloomcareru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTCAnonymous Poll201 voters

Было ли у вас такое, что, когда надеваете каблуки, в туалет хочется сильнее?

  1. Да, замечала такое9%
  2. Возможно, но не связывала одно с другим17%
  3. Нет74%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 95,825 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Анна Грикевич | Недержание, вагинизм, менопауза, опущение” (@Bloomcareru), 13,180 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bloomcareru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.