Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ПАРНИ В ЧЕРНОМ🥷

@Blackmans177

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

623subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001507991424
TypeChannel
Username@Blackmans177
DescriptionСсылка на канал t.me/Blackmans177 Для связи и помощи писать hat M.P.177 kasp @semen_strelok
Created23 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Blackmans177

Growth

6237 Aug 2026, 19:47 — 623 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 623 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:478 Aug 2026, 03:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 622–624 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:01623no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:47623first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,200
Videos
930
Links
921

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 40s
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

319 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏12338.6%
8326.0%
👍7222.6%
🔥319.72%
🫡72.19%
👎30.94%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 319reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2025 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Nov 2025, 08:54 UTC≈1,310 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мужчины, С Праздником Вас, всех кто на защите Родины Ангела Хранителя Вам, всех кого с нами уже нет Вечная Память и Вечный Покой🙏🙏🙏🧑‍🔬🥷🥷🥷🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

🙏25👍1🔥1

22 Aug 2025, 04:45 UTC≈1,630 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Black_Berets_177Video

Личный состав 177 ОГвПМП поздравляет граждан России с Днём флага России. Желаем мирного неба и светлой надежды, желаем веры и верности себе, своим близким и своей Родине, желаем крепких сил и доброй памяти о пролитой крови за Отчизну. 🇷🇺 Пусть гордо развивается флаг России на ветру, пусть и Вам по жизни сопутствует удача. Подписаться на канал Голосовать за канал #МорпехиКаспия #177полк #ЧерныеБереты #морпехи_177

19👍3🔥2

9 Aug 2025, 17:03 UTC≈1,480 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Black_Berets_177Video

БПЛАшники не оставляют шансов террористам ВСУ на Курском направлении Подписаться на канал Голосовать за канал #МорпехиКаспия #177полк #ЧерныеБереты #морпехи_177 #ГдеМыТам_Победа

4🔥3

9 Aug 2025, 06:46 UTC≈1,250 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Black_Berets_177Video

Профессиональные и решительные действия штурмовой группы не оставляют шансов ВСУ. Укреп ВСУ захвачен. Подписаться на канал Голосовать за канал #МорпехиКаспия #177полк #ЧерныеБереты #морпехи_177 #ГдеМыТам_Победа

🔥3

8 Aug 2025, 12:55 UTC≈1,060 viewsread 8 August 2026

Официальный канал 177 полка морской пехоты

3 Aug 2025, 09:55 UTC≈1,060 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Desyat_10_rykopozatyiVideo

https://t.me/dinveterble

🔥6👍4

31 Jul 2025, 07:12 UTC≈1,180 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Desyat_10_rykopozatyiVideo

Так старенькая потрёпанная Нива, благодаря умелым рукам механиков и сварщиков превращается надёжного боевого помощника 🛠⚡️🛠 Бойцы 177 ОГвПМП⚓️ сделали транспорт для подвоза и эвакуации 🤙💪 Эх на него бы ещё надёжный РЭБ установить....

🙏14🔥81

9 Jul 2025, 18:33 UTC≈1,630 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dva_majorsVideo

Сумское направление. Вблизи Писаревки и н.п. Хотень Морпехи 177-го отдельного гвардейского полка ведут бои с противником: командование ВСУ бросает в бой резервы, но встречными действиями успеха не достигает #Каспийская_флотилия #ГрВ_Север Два майора

🙏201🔥1

12 Jun 2025, 11:52 UTC≈2,000 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

16🔥1

29 May 2025, 16:08 UTC≈1,690 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @stanislav_reporterVideo

Штурмовые группы 177 полка морской пехоты разворачиваются на территории Сумской области Украины. После освобождения населенных пунктов Беловоды и Локня на территории Украины, бои идут на подступах к Юнаковке - это крупный логистический центр ВСУ. @stanislav_reporter

🙏12🫡7🔥6👍3👎32

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Blackmans177. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПАРНИ В ЧЕРНОМ🥷” (@Blackmans177), 623 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Blackmans177.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.