πSIGNAL ID: #2194π COIN: $JUP/USDT (2-5X) Direction: LONG βββββββ STOP LOSS: 0.1710 π«20% Loss (2x)π« Volatility across global markets took this one out. On to the next one. βββββββ - CRYPTOVIP_Signals

Channel
π CRYPTO VIP Signals
@BitmexSignalsFee
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
24,674subscribers
-205 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001348004614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BitmexSignalsFee |
| Description | Rose Margin VIP Yo Crypto VIP Margin Whales VIP Bitmex MaxGains VIP Klondike/Margin/Scalps Admin @KevinMurph |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BitmexSignalsFee |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 24,674 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 24,696 | -19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 24,715 | -62 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 24,777 | -48 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 24,825 | -20 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:10 | 24,845 | -13 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 24,858 | -21 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 24,879 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 19.1%
- avg views Γ· 24,674 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,720
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- β
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 28
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (17 July 2026 β 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 132,180 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 22:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- β5,890
- Videos
- β9
- Links
- β1,410
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
πSIGNAL ID: #2204π COIN: $ADA/USDT (2-5x) Direction: LONG βββββββ ENTRY: 0.1815 - 0.1825 TARGETS: 0.1900 β 0.1975 β 0.2075 - 0.2200 - 0.2350 - 0.2500 - 0.2700 - 0.3000 STOP LOSS: 0.1650 Daily FVG confluent with ascending trendline and key resistance flip at entry. βββββββ - CRYPTOVIP_Signals
πSIGNAL ID: #2203π COIN: $XLM/USDT (2-5x) Direction: LONG βββββββ ENTRY: 0.1590 - 0.1600 TARGETS: 0.1680 β 0.1760 β 0.1850 - 0.1950 - 0.2100 - 0.2300 - 0.2500 - 0.2750 - 0.3000 STOP LOSS: 0.1440 6H FVG confluent with a long-term ascending trendline and horizontal support at entry. βββββββ - CRYPTOVIP_Signals
π₯GEM SIGNAL: #VELODROMEπ₯ βββββββ Exchanges: CRYPTOFutures High volume breakout and retracement, itβs just a matter of time for the second legπ ENTRY: Below 0.0180 TARGETS: 0.0185 β 0.0190 β 0.0198 - 0.0210 - 0.023 - 0.027 - 0.031 - 0.038 - 0.048 - 0.061 - OPEN SL: Below 0.0135 βββββββ β CRYPTOVIP_Signals
Earn 200% APY on Stablecoins for 14 Days with GRVT GRVT has launched a new Liquidity Provider (GLP) Promo for stablecoin holders, available through its Telegram Mini App. During the promotional period, deposits can receive a 200% promotional APY, giving users a new way to earn on idle stablecoins within the ecosystem. The promotion supports both USDC and USDT and follows a simple structure. Open the Telegram Mini Aβ¦
πSIGNAL ID: #2202π COIN: $ICP/USDT (2-5x) Direction: LONG βββββββ ENTRY: 2.140 - 2.150 TARGETS: 2.250 β 2.350 β 2.475 - 2.600 - 2.750 - 2.900 - 3.050 - 3.250 STOP LOSS: 1.950 8H FVG confluent with double ascending trendline support at entry, sitting at the retest of a broken descending trendline. βββββββ - CRYPTOVIP_Signals
πSIGNAL ID: #2201π COIN: $SUI/USDT (2-5x) Direction: LONG βββββββ ENTRY: 0.6800 - 0.6850 TARGETS: 0.7150 β 0.7500 β 0.7900 - 0.8400 - 0.8900 - 0.9500 - 1.0200 - 1.1000 STOP LOSS: 0.6250 6H FVG confluent with ascending trendline and horizontal support at entry. βββββββ - CRYPTOVIP_Signals
πSIGNAL ID: #2186π COIN: $CRO/USDT (2-5X) Direction: LONG βββββββ STOP LOSS: 0.05150 π«17.7% Loss (2x)π« Volatility across global markets took this one out. On to the next one. βββββββ - CRYPTOVIP_Signals
πSIGNAL ID: #2199π COIN: $TAO/USDT (2-5x) Direction: LONG βββββββ ENTRY: 194.0 - 195.0 TARGETS: 204.0 β 214.0 β 225.0 - 237.0 - 250.0 - 265.0 - 282.0 - 300.0 STOP LOSS: 177.0 8H FVG at the retest of a broken descending trendline now flipping into support. βββββββ β CRYPTOVIP_Signals
πSIGNAL ID: #2198π COIN: $DOT/USDT (2-5x) Direction: LONG βββββββ ENTRY: 0.815 - 0.825 TARGETS: 0.860 β 0.900 β 0.950 - 1.010 - 1.085 - 1.170 - 1.270 - 1.400 STOP LOSS: 0.750 8H FVG sitting at the retest of a broken descending trendline, now flipping into support. βββββββ β CRYPTOVIP_Signals
πSIGNAL ID: #2189π COIN: $GRAM/USDT (2-5X) Direction: LONG βββββββ STOP LOSS: 1.350 π«20% Loss (2x)π« Volatility across global markets took this one out. On to the next one. βββββββ - CRYPTOVIP_Signals
πSIGNAL ID: #2197π COIN: $ATOM/USDT (2-5x) Direction: LONG βββββββ ENTRY: 1.325 - 1.335 TARGETS: 1.400 β 1.475 β 1.550 - 1.625 - 1.700 - 1.800 - 1.900 - 2.000 STOP LOSS: 1.200 4H and 8HFVG sitting at the retest of a broken descending trendline, now flipping into support. βββββββ β CRYPTOVIP_Signals
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @BitmexSignalsFee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 966,449 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ CRYPTO VIP Signalsβ (@BitmexSignalsFee), 24,674 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitmexSignalsFee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.