Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for One Million Challenge

Channel

One Million Challenge

@OneMillionChallenge

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,679subscribers

-1,950 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437466982
TypeChannel
Username@OneMillionChallenge
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/OneMillionChallenge

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,67919,62918,6546 August 2026 — 19,629 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,629 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,622 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,595 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,578 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,546 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,519 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,492 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,469 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,436 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,383 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,361 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,309 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,239 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,186 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,176 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,159 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,119 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,092 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,063 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,055 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,044 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,032 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,018 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,975 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,872 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,808 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,757 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,463 subscribers9 September 2026 — 18,115 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,949 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,892 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,862 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,824 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,796 subscribers26 September 2026 — 17,679 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -1,950. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,387–19,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 17:0217,679-117
19 Sept 2026, 14:1817,796-28
17 Sept 2026, 05:1617,824-38
15 Sept 2026, 05:4117,862-30
13 Sept 2026, 15:0117,892-57
11 Sept 2026, 17:3717,949-166
9 Sept 2026, 04:1618,115-348
5 Sept 2026, 16:5918,463-294
3 Sept 2026, 20:1618,757-51
2 Sept 2026, 09:4818,808-64
1 Sept 2026, 09:1318,872-103
31 Aug 2026, 08:4218,975-43
30 Aug 2026, 09:5219,018-14
29 Aug 2026, 07:0819,032-12
28 Aug 2026, 04:0819,044-11
27 Aug 2026, 01:0519,055-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:1219,063-29
25 Aug 2026, 02:5419,092-27
23 Aug 2026, 21:0919,119-40
22 Aug 2026, 01:4919,159first reading

Engagement

205 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.0%
avg views ÷ 17,679 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,180
35 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
35
of 205 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held205 (2 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total216,391
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 01:31 UTC601 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 SHORT 🔰 Price Action : Ember Strategy #BAND/USDT Entry : 1) 0.1811 2) 0.1865 Targets : 1) 0.1800 2) 0.1762 3) 0.1723 4) 0.1685 🛑 Stop : 0.1925 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

2 Sept 2026, 22:28 UTC≈3,660 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Thunder Strategy #BARD/USDT Entry : 1) 0.1174000 2) 0.113878 Targets : 1) 0.1180742 2) 0.1205267 3) 0.1229793 4) 0.1254319 🛑 Stop : 0.1100038 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

2 Sept 2026, 15:14 UTC≈6,420 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Thunder Strategy #TUT/USDT Entry : 1) 0.0253000 2) 0.024541 Targets : 1) 0.0254452 2) 0.0259738 3) 0.0265023 4) 0.0270309 🛑 Stop : 0.0237061 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

2 Sept 2026, 11:23 UTC≈6,420 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Thunder Strategy #AIGENSYN/USDT Entry : 1) 0.0189900 2) 0.0184203 Targets : 1) 0.0190990 2) 0.0194957 3) 0.0198924 4) 0.0202892 🛑 Stop : 0.0177936 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

2 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC≈6,420 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 SHORT 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Nova Strategy #XMR/USDT Entry : 1) 523.71 2) 539.42 Targets : 1) 520.64 2) 509.58 3) 498.53 4) 487.47 🛑 Stop : 556.70 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

2 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC≈6,440 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Thunder Strategy #TUT/USDT Entry : 1) 0.0285800 2) 0.0277226 Targets : 1) 0.0287441 2) 0.0293411 3) 0.0299382 4) 0.0305353 🛑 Stop : 0.0267794 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

2 Sept 2026, 00:07 UTC≈6,420 viewsread 3 September 2026

🔴 SHORT 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Nova Strategy #IOST/USDT Entry : 1) 0.00060350 2) 0.00062160 Targets : 1) 0.00059996 2) 0.00058722 3) 0.00057448 4) 0.00056174 🛑 Stop : 0.00064152 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

1 Sept 2026, 19:48 UTC≈6,430 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Nova Strategy #BTC/USDT Entry : 1) 77260.40 2) 74942.58 Targets : 1) 77704.09 2) 79318.12 3) 80932.15 4) 82546.18 🛑 Stop : 72392.99 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

1 Sept 2026, 16:46 UTC≈6,430 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : Ember Strategy #CRV/USDT Entry : 1) 0.368300 2) 0.357251 Targets : 1) 0.370415 2) 0.378109 3) 0.385803 4) 0.393497 🛑 Stop : 0.345097 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

1 Sept 2026, 13:45 UTC≈6,430 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥉 Apex Strategy #XMR/USDT Entry : 1) 511.76 2) 496.40 Targets : 1) 514.69 2) 525.39 3) 536.08 4) 546.77 🛑 Stop : 479.51 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

1 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC≈6,430 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Thunder Strategy #TLM/USDT Entry : 1) 0.0013590 2) 0.0013182 Targets : 1) 0.0013668 2) 0.0013951 3) 0.0014235 4) 0.0014519 🛑 Stop : 0.0012733 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

1 Sept 2026, 06:56 UTC≈6,430 viewsread 3 September 2026

🟢 Long 🔰 Price Action : 🥈 Thunder Strategy #ACT/USDT Entry : 1) 0.0101430 2) 0.0098387 Targets : 1) 0.0102012 2) 0.0104131 3) 0.0106250 4) 0.0108369 🛑 Stop : 0.0095039 Leverage : 10x (isolated) @OneMillionChallenge

Showing the 12 most recent of 205 posts we hold for @OneMillionChallenge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

📉 CRYPTO VIP Signals
@BitmexSignalsFee · 21,517
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 September 2026
Sweden_Crypto Whales®
@cryptosignalsandanalyse · 34,205
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 September 2026
Pro Cloud Trading
@ProCloudTrading · 20,643
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 September 2026
The Analyst CRYPTO
@TheAnalystCrypto · 71,010
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Binance Killers®
@BinanceCryptoKillers · 36,560
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
Verified Crypto Traders ®
@VerifiedCryptoTradersgram · 21,741
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 22 September 2026
Jusko Trader 🐋
@juskotraderreal1 · 179,387
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
Crypto Profit Coach™
@cryptoprofitcoach · 28,396
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“One Million Challenge” (@OneMillionChallenge), 17,679 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OneMillionChallenge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.