Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

2008 361 White Paper- WP

@BitcoinWP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

25subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001327574999
TypeChannel
Username@BitcoinWP
DescriptionBitcoin White Paper https://t.me/BitCoinWP https://web.archive.org/web/20091128185352/http://voxel.dl.sourceforge.net/project/bitcoin/Research%20Paper/bitcoin.pdf/bitcoin.pdf https://bitcoinsv.io/bitcoin.pdf https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BitcoinWP

Growth

256 August 2026 — 25 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–26 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 09:3125no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:5425first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
231
Videos
7
Links
455

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
8m 05s
Average length
8m 05s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 30 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Apr 2026, 13:09 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/i/status/2049603008896331891 WTF!!!

Signed Ramon Quesada. † 🙏

6 Apr 2026, 04:24 UTC49 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

How does someone who believes BTC is Bitcoin debunk the explanation that Craig published the White Paper specifically on October 31st because it coincides with his father's birthday, to spite him (his father didn't approve of Bitcoin) https://vwma.org.au/explore/people/822351 https://x.com/i/status/2040343266135011742

Signed Ramon Quesada. † 🙏

6 Apr 2026, 04:21 UTC36 viewsread 11 August 2026

when is it the day of Martin Luther's protest? Reformation Day is celebrated annually on October 31 to commemorate the day in 1517 when Martin Luther is believed to have posted his 95 Theses on the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany. This event is regarded as the start of the Protestant Reformation, challenging the Roman Catholic Church's practices.Date: October 31st (The eve of All Saints' Day).Signif

Signed Ramon Quesada. † 🙏

15 Mar 2026, 20:40 UTC26 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @BSVEducationPhoto

Craig Steven Wright Hidden in the Bitcoin White Paper Since 2008? Steganography + 17-Year Military Plan Just Being Revealed! 🚨 HIDDEN CODE IN THE BITCOIN WHITE PAPER? Craig Steven Wright was there from the very beginning?! 🔥Two independent people – Casey and Alex Fll – without a dime in payment – found his full name Craig Steven Wright encoded right in Satoshi’s document using steganography (the same technique used b

Signed Ramon Quesada. † 🙏

28 Nov 2025, 03:15 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026

La creación de Bitcoin no comenzó como una reacción melodramática a un solo otoño de colapso financiero, ni como un aullido adolescente ante los titulares de los periódicos. Comenzó antes, de la forma silenciosa y poco glamurosa en que la ingeniería seria siempre comienza: con código. La codificación comenzó aproximadamente dieciocho meses antes de que el libro blanco adquiriera su forma pulida y pública. El documen

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪 🗽

28 Nov 2025, 03:12 UTC20 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

S. Tominaga, AKA CSW Nov. 28, 2025 https://x.com/CsTominaga/status/1994238121937129550?t=BmO4kanYfI6im9MtoEQ46Q&s=19 https://t.me/S_Tominaga/5074

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪 🗽

24 Nov 2025, 20:55 UTC24 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

El_Paper_de_Bitcoin.mp4

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪 🗽

24 Nov 2025, 14:28 UTC21 viewsread 11 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪 🗽

24 Nov 2025, 14:27 UTC20 viewsread 11 August 2026

Ramon Quesada ha compartido un archivo con usted https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:EU:5aedc69b-ebfb-4079-9569-25c9de2fd7b2

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪 🗽

25 Oct 2025, 08:04 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪 🗽

23 Oct 2025, 20:52 UTC30 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪 🗽

13 Sept 2025, 23:15 UTC34 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

A continuación voy a presentar el trabajo del Dr. Craig S. Wright, donde analiza uno por uno los capítulos del White Paper de Bitcoin, no he visto nada igual en todos los años que vengo siguiendo esta tecnología desde 2013, ni siquiera cuando estuve de encargado de la revista online Cointelegraph España, ni en todo lo que he visto o leído de CSW, desde que lo sigo a diario desde 2017, probablemente estemos ante el m

👏1

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BitcoinWP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 520,959 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“2008 361 White Paper- WP” (@BitcoinWP), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitcoinWP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.