Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

150 Ingredientes invisibles en Bitcoin

@BitcoinIngredientes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002043107128
TypeChannel
Username@BitcoinIngredientes
DescriptionIngredientes invisibles en Bitcoin https://t.me/BitcoinIngredientes Cripto/ Bitcoin Mitos https://t.me/BitcoinMyths
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 8 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BitcoinIngredientes

Growth

412 Aug 2026, 18:46 — 4 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 4 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 18:4613 Aug 2026, 10:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:014no change
12 Aug 2026, 18:464first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
3
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

16 Apr 2025, 06:39 UTC6 viewsread 13 August 2026

Este me lo veo, del colega Ian Triple Entry Accounting with Ian Grigg | Ep 16 | S5 https://youtube.com/live/hH9q1833XNw?si=q7HpmmpLI_ZgUgSl

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

21 Mar 2025, 22:45 UTC9 viewsread 13 August 2026

Toma el rol de un experto en Bitcoin y Blockchain y dime qué significa el doble hash en bitcoin. En Bitcoin, el doble hash (o *double hashing*) se refiere a aplicar la función criptográfica SHA-256 dos veces consecutivas sobre un mismo conjunto de datos. Este proceso es fundamental en varios componentes de la red Bitcoin, como la minería, la creación de identificadores de transacciones (TXID) y la estructura del enc

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

16 Mar 2025, 11:08 UTC8 viewsread 13 August 2026

CSW 150 Game theory - Teoría de juegos https://t.me/+qjNzpdpkLmVjM2Q0

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

3 Feb 2025, 14:31 UTC11 viewsread 13 August 2026

Techo de escalabilidad +50k TPS https://t.me/+p85g7v1-k6VlOTk0

Signed Admon S y C

3 Feb 2025, 14:13 UTC11 viewsread 13 August 2026

El problema del techo de las 50k TPS 6. Con un límite de 32MB, BCH puede llegar a ~200tps, pero aún si quisieran aumentarlo más existe un limite teorico (llamado techo de escalabilidad), donde la tecnología conocida de cualquier base de datos o blockchain solo puede llegar a ~50mil tps, por lo tanto después de ese limite no sirve la arquitectura de software de Mempool, para validar las trasacciones y al tiempo propa

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

30 Oct 2024, 07:10 UTC16 viewsread 13 August 2026

CSW 150 Transparency https://t.me/+t25s_iXACxhjMTQ0

Signed Admon S y C

7 Oct 2024, 06:06 UTC18 viewsread 13 August 2026

Grupo de canales de Telegram: BitCoin History (por años) https://t.me/TheBitcoinHistory Ingredientes invisibles en Bitcoin https://t.me/BitcoinIngredientes BitCoin database ownership https://t.me/BitCoinDatabaseOwnership Los mitos de BTC / BTC Myth https://t.me/BitcoinMyths https://t.me/c/2390601295/94 Minería https://t.me/c/2390601295/95

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

22 Sept 2024, 22:28 UTC15 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/BitcoinCashCOL/status/1828122203684032533?t=5l3lXu6HazRPSSSocWCqHg&s=19

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

22 Sept 2024, 22:28 UTC13 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

22 Sept 2024, 22:28 UTC12 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

¿QUÉ PASA CON CRAIG WRIGHT? Prueba de compra de dominio Bitcoin.org, monedas de Satoshi moviéndose TODO BITCOIN 2,15 K suscriptores 20 sept 2024 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G69EWF8acG0&ab_channel=TODOBITCOIN

Signed Ramon Quesada.🇻🇪

11 Sept 2024, 00:24 UTCviews —

150 Ingredientes invisibles en Bitcoin pinned «INGREDIENTES INVISIBLES: (cod. 150) Ingredientes invisibles en Bitcoin https://t.me/BitcoinIngredientes Bitcoin is a predicate machine https://t.me/+tB4SbqxcQDVkYTE0 Anonymous Vs Private https://t.me/+xjIWxUXtyhRjY2U0 2005 Triple-entry accounting…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BitcoinIngredientes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,115,940 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“150 Ingredientes invisibles en Bitcoin” (@BitcoinIngredientes), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitcoinIngredientes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.