Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

BitKorn

@BitKornRUS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

696subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001358255271
TypeChannel
Username@BitKornRUS
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BitKornRUS

Growth

6967 Aug 2026, 02:01 — 696 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:51 — 696 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:017 Aug 2026, 12:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 695–697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 12:51696no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:01696first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.6%
avg views ÷ 696 subscribers
Avg views / post
171
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026
Posts held20 (17 September 202531 July 2026)
Views total171
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,183 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 547202202427458458046339.1%
21418.1%
🔥16013.5%
👍14812.5%
💯978.20%
custom 5472147454499496628272.28%
🤡211.78%
😁161.35%
🤬121.01%
💩90.761%
👎70.592%
🤯60.507%
30.254%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 September 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
78
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 20 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
37
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BitKornRUS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 September 2025 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 15:28 UTC171 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitcoin21ideas

🎲 Сид на костях Вместо того, чтобы обсасывать уже произошедшее, подготовил гид по генерации сида, не полагаясь на случайный генератор чисел. В гиде поясняется как броски кубика (или монетки), собственно, превращаются в слова, какие инструменты (и как) использовать для безопасной генерации, чего не делать ни в коем случае. Даже если у вас не Codlcard, оказавшийся уязвимым к атаке, проведите аудит приватных ключей и

👍197🔥1

31 May 2026, 16:14 UTC581 views35 reactions37 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitcoin21ideas

📚 Протокол тишины. Глава 2 Утром система отняла у него семьдесят пять тысяч. К вечеру он отдал ей кое-что поценнее. 🔗 https://21ideas.org/silence-protocol/2/ Вторая глава заняла намного больше времени, чем мы ожидали, зато книга всё меньше напоминает выдумку. Делитесь обратной связью в комментариях

🔥13👍118👎1💩1🤡1

13 Apr 2026, 21:04 UTC710 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitcoin21ideas

📖 21wiki: биткоин-энциклопедия Запущена первая полноценная биткоин-вики на русском Что такое UTXO? Почему важен PoW? Кто такой Ник Сабо? Теперь ответы на эти и сотни других вопросов собраны в биткоин-википедии от 21ideas. Эти материалы уже были на сайте, но в формате длинных статей – не самый удобный способ быстро разобраться в теме. Формат вики решает это: каждая концепция, личность или событие – отдельная стран

custom 547202202427458458015👍8🔥621

8 Mar 2026, 16:53 UTC≈3,330 views79 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Отсутствие текстов не всегда означает отсутствие мыслей. В моём случае это признак того, что шум вокруг стал слишком невыносимым, чтобы в нем участвовать. Пока рынок ищет дно, я решил зафиксировать траекторию падения системы, в которой нам довелось жить. Я начал писать книгу. Это не попытка стать литератором в мире, где люди разучились читать что-то длиннее подписи к пятнадцатисекундному видео. Это описание того циф

32custom 547214745449949662821👍11custom 54720220242745845807💯2🔥2🤡2💩1

4 Dec 2025, 13:21 UTC≈4,820 views67 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Форд был прав, но не совсем. Золото — это ошейник, но государство — это удавка. Ровно 104 года назад, 4 декабря 1921 года, Генри Форд заявил то, за что сегодня его бы отменили быстрее, чем Канье Уэста. Он сказал, что золото — это причина всех войн. Что банкиры держат мир за горло, контролируя слитки, и что единственный способ остановить бесконечную бойню — это валюта, обеспеченная энергией. Старик Генри был гениаль

custom 547202202427458458038🔥139💯2🤡21💩1😁1

21 Nov 2025, 10:52 UTC≈1,820 views85 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

Индустрия годами продавала нам сказку об институциональном принятии. Нам говорили, что придут парни из BlackRock и Vanguard и пампанут наши мешки. Что ж, они пришли. Но не просто так. Ещё они захватили свои правила игры. Манипуляции на рынке были всегда, но если раньше балом правили киты, которые выбивали стопы ради забавы и профита, то теперь судьбу рынка решают бюрократия, регламенты и клерк из индексного комитета

custom 547202202427458458048👍1713🔥3💯2🤡2

19 Nov 2025, 11:44 UTC789 views70 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По всему миру государства строят лабиринты норм, чтоб ты ползал на коленях: США — 300 тысяч федеральных правил и кодексов, ЕС — потоки директив, Китай — цензурные декреты. Миллиарды страниц бумажной плесени, подтираемой твоим временем и послушанием. Глобальный фарс: правители диктуют, ты — расходник. РФ — всего лишь один павильон в этом зоопарке. В России государство требует: соблюдай законы. Незнание не освобождает

custom 54720220242745845803315🔥12💯4👍2🤡2👎1😁1

18 Nov 2025, 12:14 UTC555 views43 reactions7 Starsread 7 August 2026

Если хотите запустить свою ноду, но не понимаете, с чего начать, пишите мне и мы договоримся об условиях. Разберём железо, софт, конфигурацию, приватность. Настроим так, чтобы вы не зависели от чужих правил.

20custom 547202202427458458010🔥5🤡3😁3💩2

18 Nov 2025, 11:36 UTC584 views71 reactions6 Starsread 7 August 2026

RUN YOUR OWN NODE Большинство думает, что нода — это что-то "для сети". Нет. Нода — это инструмент самозащиты. Для чего нужна нода? • Обеспечивает выполнение правил сети Это делают не майнеры, не биржи и не разработчики. Это делаеn твоя нода. Она проверяет каждый блок и каждую транзакцию, которые она принимает, сверяя их с правилами протокола, в том числе: • что эмиссия не превышает 21 млн • что нет двойной

29custom 547202202427458458026💯11🤡2👍1💩1😁1

17 Nov 2025, 08:28 UTC476 views50 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @bitcoin21ideasPhoto

⛏️ 95% всех биткоинов уже добыты Сегодня был добыт 19 940 000-й биткоин. С учётом монет, которые доказуемо невозможно потратить, это составляет 95% всех монет в обращении. Осталось добыть чуть больше миллиона монет, и этот процесс займет около 115 лет. Последний биткоин будет добыт примерно в 2140 году. Ограниченное предложение, постоянно снижающаяся эмиссия и растущий спрос — классическая формула роста ценности.

🔥20custom 54720220242745845802010

31 Oct 2025, 14:53 UTC764 views38 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/BitKornRUS/275 Ребята, а помните? Сейчас цена 110к и индекс страха и жадности ближе к максимальному страху 😂😂😂 UPDATE: сцук, только написал, как палка на 111к улетела. Пампанул, так сказаць 💪

custom 5472022024274584580187🔥4😁4💩2👎1💯1🤡1

29 Oct 2025, 16:42 UTC≈1,020 views85 reactions4 Starsread 7 August 2026

Центральные банки — это институционализированная система кражи человеческого времени. Смотри, каждый доллар, который ты держишь, являестся зафиксированным временем твоей жизни. Ты работал. Ты обменял часы своей жизни на эти "деньги", которые должны были сберегать созданную тобой ценность. В 2020 году правительство США напечатало около 6 триллионов новых долларов из воздуха. Этих денег никогда не существовало. Средни

custom 54720220242745845804815👍15💯3🔥2👎1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BitKornRUS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 378,640 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BitKorn” (@BitKornRUS), 696 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BitKornRUS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.