16+ Odds π¦β€οΈπ€ All For Today π―π₯ Give Reactions & Stake π°
π132π118π114β€106π₯101π90

Channel
@BULLDOGODDS
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
71,181subscribers
-340 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001391729526 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BULLDOGODDS |
| Description | Remove Hate From Your Heart That Sh**t Delays Blessingsβ¦β¦!!!!!! @BULLDOG_ODDS |
| Created | 15 July 2018 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 17 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BULLDOGODDS |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 71,181 | -103 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 71,284 | -69 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 71,353 | -72 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 71,425 | -96 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 71,521 | no change |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 71,521 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (29 July 2026 β 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 513,540 |
| Reactions total | 15,140 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 23 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
15,140 reactions across 25 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 2,571 | 17.0% | |
| π₯ | 2,569 | 17.0% | |
| π | 2,559 | 16.9% | |
| π | 2,522 | 16.7% | |
| β€ | 2,496 | 16.5% | |
| π | 2,387 | 15.8% | |
| π | 3 | 0.02% | |
| π | 3 | 0.02% | |
| π | 3 | 0.02% | |
| π€ | 3 | 0.02% | |
| π | 2 | 0.013% | |
| π― | 2 | 0.013% | |
| π | 2 | 0.013% | |
| π | 2 | 0.013% | |
| π | 2 | 0.013% | |
| π€© | 2 | 0.013% | |
| π₯° | 2 | 0.013% | |
| β | 1 | 0.007% | |
| π | 1 | 0.007% | |
| π | 1 | 0.007% | |
| 7 further kinds | 7 | 0.046% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 15,140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
16+ Odds π¦β€οΈπ€ All For Today π―π₯ Give Reactions & Stake π°
π132π118π114β€106π₯101π90
DLKLG2 - Accumulated odds Drop reactions let boom π₯π₯π₯π₯
π115π₯115π113π109π106β€102π1π1
AE1YJA 79 odds
π106β€95π95π90π₯86π81π1π1
AJ87CM - Accumulated odds !! Drop reactions let boom. π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
π102β€97π₯97π91π83π82π1π1
8 ODDS β 8VKG6S
π98π₯94π91β€90π89π88π1π―1
Photo, posted without a caption
π₯115π91π90π90π89β€77
HEIST GK04Q1 - 25 odds βπ½
π106β€103π90π₯86π83π82
Photo, posted without a caption
π120π₯114π110π106π96β€49π―1π1
3,000+ Odds. 9QD2GS React To This Post For More Gameβ€οΈ
π123π112β€111π₯102π100π52π€1π₯°1
110 odds - Z558LU 104 odds - J8NXFE 103 odds - P18BCW 85 odds - N9JGYT 76 odds - KN6X5J 72 odds - TXPHHJ
π120π₯117π116β€104π102π101
Baseball π
π123π114β€112π109π₯103π102π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π133π120π₯112π107β€98π92π€1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @BULLDOGODDS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegramβs own answer, not this registerβs.When this register asks Telegramβs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it β never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramβs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramβs recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register β how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βBULLDOG ODDS π₯β (@BULLDOGODDS), 71,181 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BULLDOGODDS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.