Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ZEUS AVENUE

Channel

ZEUS AVENUE

@djkaazigi0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,314subscribers

-578 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001146469018
TypeChannel
Username@djkaazigi0
CreatedBetween 1 June 2016 and 31 January 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/djkaazigi0

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,3146,8926,60318 August 2026 — 6,892 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,892 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,848 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,651 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,568 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,513 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,437 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,358 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,314 subscribers18 August 202613 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 26 days, net -578. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,227–6,979 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 11:566,314-44
9 Sept 2026, 06:226,358-79
3 Sept 2026, 23:386,437-76
31 Aug 2026, 06:256,513-55
28 Aug 2026, 09:536,568-83
25 Aug 2026, 04:546,651-197
21 Aug 2026, 18:496,848-44
18 Aug 2026, 17:546,892no change
18 Aug 2026, 17:456,892first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 17 August 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.0%
avg views ÷ 6,314 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held6 (17 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total7,190
Reactions total72
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 34s
Average length
2m 09s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

125 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8366.4%
🔥2116.8%
🎄64.80%
54.00%
💯54.00%
❤‍🔥32.40%
💋10.8%
😎10.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 20:53 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🔥 ATTENTION EVERYONE! 🔥 Since the season has started Please, nobody should leave the channel! 🙏🏽 I’ll be dropping FREE GAMES 🎮🔥 in the group, so make sure you stay tuned and keep your notifications on. More exciting stuff is coming soon! 👀🔥 Stay with us and don’t miss out! ❤️‍🔥

6💯5

18 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC≈3,650 views38 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

New primary teacher with colleague

🔥1814🎄6

17 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC≈2,380 views23 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

165💋1🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈2,740 views28 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

25❤‍🔥2🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈2,700 views25 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

22❤‍🔥1🔥1😎1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @djkaazigi0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

𝐁𝐄𝐓 𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐄
@abiola123 · 46,485
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 26 August 2026
RAZAKVVIP
@Razakvvip · 6
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
FJ ODDS
@fjodds0 · 85,335
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
🏆MASTERS TIPS🏆
@Masterstips125 · 27,844
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
ASAKAAFIXED
@asakaafixed01 · 80,188
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 5 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ZEUS AVENUE” (@djkaazigi0), 6,314 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/djkaazigi0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.