π° CRYPTO NEWS Study finds 65,340 risky crypto addresses tied to $574 million in losses (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π41π11π10π₯9β€5

Channel
@AandCNews
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
25,280subscribers
-189 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001581872089 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AandCNews |
| Description | A&C NEWS https://x.com/aandcnews Stay ahead of the market. Crypto β’ Alpha β’ Breaking News We deliver signals, sentiment & speed. π Trades | π° News | π Global updates π© Ads & promos: contact@aandcnews.com β οΈ This is not financial advice |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AandCNews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 25,280 | +101 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 25,179 | -135 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 25,314 | -63 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 25,377 | -121 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 25,498 | +116 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 25,382 | -87 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 25,469 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 25,469 | first reading |
110 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 110 (6 August 2026 β 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 544,727 |
| Reactions total | 8,627 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 13 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
8,627 reactions across 110 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 4,142 | 48.0% | |
| π₯ | 1,166 | 13.5% | |
| β€ | 1,120 | 13.0% | |
| π | 1,102 | 12.8% | |
| π | 462 | 5.36% | |
| π₯° | 324 | 3.76% | |
| π€© | 300 | 3.48% | |
| π | 11 | 0.128% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 110 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 8,627reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 110 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π° CRYPTO NEWS Study finds 65,340 risky crypto addresses tied to $574 million in losses (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π41π11π10π₯9β€5
π¨ BREAKING CRYPTO NEWS π¨ Crypto Hack Drains $25.6 Million From Unknown Victims (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π21π11π10π₯9β€8
π° CRYPTO NEWS Live Markets: U.S. inflation is stickier than Julyβs mild CPI reading suggests (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π43β€12π₯10π7π7
π¨ BREAKING CRYPTO NEWS π¨ Lazarus Hacker Group Starts Moving Bitcoin: Analyzing the Pattern (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π36β€17π₯14π5π4
π° CRYPTO NEWS XRP Faces Its Strongest Selling Pressure Since May: Whatβs Next for Rippleβs Price? (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π34π₯12β€9π9π8
π¨ BREAKING CRYPTO NEWS π¨ Soft U.S. CPI meets weak BTC: Is the βBitcoin bottomβ thesis breaking? (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π43π₯21π15π10β€9
π° CRYPTO NEWS Arthur Hayes says a $60 billion Fed cap is Bitcoinβs next liquidity trigger and needed for a price surge (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π52β€20π17π₯15π8
π° CRYPTO NEWS Bitcoin volatility hits 2-year lows β Is a major price move brewing? (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π52β€22π19π₯19π9
π° CRYPTO NEWS ASX shareholder plans to sue former directors over failed blockchain project (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π51π₯20β€17π15π10
π° CRYPTO NEWS BNB price rebound runs into $620 supply zone again β What comes next? (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π46π19π₯14π11β€7
π¨ BREAKING CRYPTO NEWS π¨ CFTC invokes emergency powers to keep Kalshi operating in New York fight (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π46β€19π₯19π17π6
π¨ BREAKING CRYPTO NEWS π¨ Harmony considers rollback after suspected exploit inflates ONE supply (Link) @AandCNews Sponsored Advert: MARKETING SERVICES
π27π17π₯16β€15π14
Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @AandCNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,010,981 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βA&C News ποΈβ (@AandCNews), 25,280 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AandCNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.